Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #79308
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'win32': 0.03; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'function,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:skip:t 10': 0.09; 'windows,': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'wrote': 0.14; '0.03': 0.16; '0.04': 0.16; '2.7.3': 0.16; 'precision,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'seconds.': 0.16; 'there?': 0.16; 'unix,': 0.16; 'thanks,': 0.17; 'feb': 0.22; '>>>': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'algorithms.': 0.24; 'processor': 0.24; 'script': 0.25; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'function': 0.29; 'resolution': 0.29; 'skip:q 20': 0.31; 'case,': 0.35; 'definition': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'seconds': 0.37; 'wrong': 0.37; 'expressed': 0.37; 'depends': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'fact': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'number,': 0.60; 'first': 0.61; 'more': 0.64; '2014,': 0.84; 'florian': 0.84 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Florian Lindner <mailinglists@xgm.de> |
| Subject | time.perf_counter in Python 2? |
| Date | Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:47:42 +0200 |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8Bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | lapsgs09.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.14.1 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.14993.1413791277.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 41 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1413791277 news.xs4all.nl 2872 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59337 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:79308 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hello, I wrote a script that does some time measurements. It uses time.perf_counter() from Python 3 which works very well. Now I need to backport it to python 2. Docs say that time.clock() is way to go: time.clock() On Unix, return the current processor time as a floating point number expressed in seconds. The precision, and in fact the very definition of the meaning of “processor time”, depends on that of the C function of the same name, but in any case, this is the function to use for benchmarking Python or timing algorithms. On Windows, this function returns wall-clock seconds elapsed since the first call to this function, as a floating point number, based on the Win32 function QueryPerformanceCounter(). The resolution is typically better than one microsecond. But for me it always returns the almost same number, nothing time like: Python 2.7.3 (default, Feb 27 2014, 19:58:35) [GCC 4.6.3] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import time >>> time.clock() 0.03 >>> time.clock() 0.03 >>> time.clock() 0.04 >>> time.clock() 0.04 What's wrong there? Thanks, Florian
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
time.perf_counter in Python 2? Florian Lindner <mailinglists@xgm.de> - 2014-10-20 09:47 +0200
csiph-web