Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #78701
| From | Sturla Molden <sturla.molden@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: "High water" Memory fragmentation still a thing? |
| Date | 2014-10-04 17:51 +0000 |
| References | <542f8a27$0$12998$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.14603.1412445100.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote: > [Aside: The thing that people fail to understand is that the GIL is not in > fact something which *prevents* multi-tasking, but it *enables* cooperative > multi-tasking: > > http://www.dabeaz.com/python/GIL.pdf > > although that's not to say that there aren't some horrible performance > characteristics of the GIL. David Beazley has identified issues with the > GIL which suggest room for improving the GIL and avoiding "GIL battles" > which are responsible for much of the overhead of CPU-bound threads. Any C > programmers who want to hack on the interpreter core?] Didn't the "new GIL" fix some of these problems? Sturla
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: "High water" Memory fragmentation still a thing? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-10-04 09:26 +1000
Re: "High water" Memory fragmentation still a thing? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-10-04 11:02 +1000
Re: "High water" Memory fragmentation still a thing? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-10-04 12:22 +1000
Re: "High water" Memory fragmentation still a thing? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-10-04 15:48 +1000
Re: "High water" Memory fragmentation still a thing? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-10-04 15:57 +1000
Re: "High water" Memory fragmentation still a thing? Sturla Molden <sturla.molden@gmail.com> - 2014-10-04 17:51 +0000
Re: "High water" Memory fragmentation still a thing? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2014-10-04 16:20 -0400
Re: "High water" Memory fragmentation still a thing? mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2014-10-05 20:23 +0100
Re: "High water" Memory fragmentation still a thing? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-10-06 07:20 +0000
Re: "High water" Memory fragmentation still a thing? bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com - 2014-10-06 09:21 -0700
Re: "High water" Memory fragmentation still a thing? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-10-07 03:43 +1100
Re: "High water" Memory fragmentation still a thing? bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com - 2014-10-08 10:28 -0700
Re: "High water" Memory fragmentation still a thing? Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2014-10-09 14:39 -0700
Re: "High water" Memory fragmentation still a thing? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-10-10 08:42 +1100
Re: "High water" Memory fragmentation still a thing? dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2014-10-10 08:09 +0200
Re: "High water" Memory fragmentation still a thing? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-10-10 17:52 +1100
csiph-web