Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #80407
| From | Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method |
| Date | 2014-11-09 11:31 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <cc7jtiFubltU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <c25aa612-bff2-4982-8fb9-5b17a866bead@googlegroups.com> <87a943qyvn.fsf@handshake.de> <545CC204.2010301@stoneleaf.us> <8761eq424e.fsf@handshake.de> <mailman.15584.1415476169.18130.python-list@python.org> |
Ethan Furman wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/06/2014 10:59 PM, dieter wrote:
>>>
>>>> A possibility to get the original approach implemented looks like:
>>>>
>>>> make "__call__" a descriptor on the class which looks up the real
>>>> method on the instance.
>>>
>>> This still wouldn't get the signatrue correct, though.
>>
>> Why not? Once the descriptor is resolved, you get the final
>> instance method - with the correct signature.
>
> Hmmm... well, it wouldn't be correct on a class lookup, but, yeah, it
> would be correct for an instance lookup -- and maybe that's good enough
> for the OP.
Seems to depend on how you get hold of the object you're
inspecting the signature of. I did an experiment:
class C(object):
@property
def __call__(self):
return self.call
def f(x, y):
print("Called f with %s, %s" % (x, y))
c = C()
c.call = f
c(17, 42)
prints:
Called f with 17, 42
This works too:
import inspect
print(inspect.getargspec(c.__call__))
prints:
ArgSpec(args=['x', 'y'], varargs=None, keywords=None, defaults=None)
But
print(inspect.getargspec(c))
doesn't work:
TypeError: <__main__.C object at 0x479250> is not a Python function
(BTW, I'm actually surprised that this technique makes c callable.
There must be more going on that just "look up __call__ in the class
object", because evaluating C.__call__ just returns the descriptor
and doesn't invoking the descriptor mechanism.)
--
Greg
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-11-04 11:12 -0800
Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-11-06 12:21 -0800
Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2014-11-07 07:59 +0100
Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-11-07 04:58 -0800
Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2014-11-08 07:50 +0100
Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-11-08 11:49 -0800
Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-11-09 11:31 +1300
Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-11-08 19:27 -0800
Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-11-10 00:38 +1300
Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-11-10 00:14 +1100
Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-11-09 12:16 -0800
Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-11-11 00:43 -0700
Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method Fabio Zadrozny <fabiofz@gmail.com> - 2014-11-12 13:33 -0200
Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-11-13 17:20 +1300
Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method Fabio Zadrozny <fabiofz@gmail.com> - 2014-11-13 11:38 -0200
Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-11-12 11:58 -0700
csiph-web