Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #1917 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Antti Louko <alo@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-06-07 20:03 +0300 |
| Last post | 2014-06-17 10:33 +0300 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.postscript
HP OfficeJet Pro X476DW missing standard output or feedback stream Antti Louko <alo@iki.fi> - 2014-06-07 20:03 +0300
Re: HP OfficeJet Pro X476DW missing standard output or feedback stream luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2014-06-08 10:49 -0700
Re: HP OfficeJet Pro X476DW missing standard output or feedback stream James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> - 2014-06-10 20:07 -0400
Re: HP OfficeJet Pro X476DW missing standard output or feedback stream Antti Louko <alo@iki.fi> - 2014-06-11 10:06 +0300
Re: HP OfficeJet Pro X476DW missing standard output or feedback stream Antti Louko <alo@iki.fi> - 2014-06-17 10:33 +0300
| From | Antti Louko <alo@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-06-07 20:03 +0300 |
| Subject | HP OfficeJet Pro X476DW missing standard output or feedback stream |
| Message-ID | <539345D7.3080708@iki.fi> |
I just got HP OfficeJet Pro X476DW. Postscript seems to be quite OK after some basic testing. Printer is fast and scanner has working autofeeder with duplex support. However, on Postscript side, any operators which are supposed to print back using print, ==, pstack etc. operators, produce no data back to the TCP channel. I used the normal "telnet printer-IP-address 9100" way to connect. Does anyone know more about this? Is it common to disable the feedback channel totally. I have some scripts which have used this in the past.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-06-08 10:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <eede5262-bd2e-4864-b693-7f68f1fa38cf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #1917 |
On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:03:19 PM UTC-5, Antti Louko wrote: > I just got HP OfficeJet Pro X476DW. Postscript seems to be quite OK > after some basic testing. Printer is fast and scanner has working > autofeeder with duplex support. > > However, on Postscript side, any operators which are supposed to print > back using print, ==, pstack etc. operators, produce no data back to the > TCP channel. I used the normal "telnet printer-IP-address 9100" way to > connect. > > Does anyone know more about this? Is it common to disable the feedback > channel totally. I have some scripts which have used this in the past. I've never heard of disabling the back channel. But Postscript 3 makes lots of system parameters accessible to the script. There may be one that does this. Or it may be something you need to enable from the front panel, like printing error reports on paper.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-06-10 20:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <m3y4x41f7a.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org> |
| In reply to | #1917 |
There might be a config setting which affects whether port 9100 is bidirectional. I seem to recall seeing such on another printer at some point, but the memory is vague. Something along the lines of which class of 1284 it should emulate? -JimC -- James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Antti Louko <alo@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-06-11 10:06 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <5398000B.2080207@iki.fi> |
| In reply to | #1919 |
James Cloos wrote: > There might be a config setting which affects whether port 9100 is > bidirectional. If there is, it is not visible to any user accessible menus. > I seem to recall seeing such on another printer at some point, but > the memory is vague. Something along the lines of which class of > 1284 it should emulate? I don't think they would still have any LPT compatibility as HP printers hav not had parallel interfaces for many years. And earlier models, even from 1990s didn't have any LPT emulation visible in their Jetdirect interfaces. I opened a support case for this. I will tell here how it goes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Antti Louko <alo@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-06-17 10:33 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <539FEF30.9050304@iki.fi> |
| In reply to | #1920 |
Antti Louko wrote: > I opened a support case for this. I will tell here how it goes. And now they closed the case, without any comments. Quite rude, I think. I had to phone them to reopen the case.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.postscript
csiph-web