Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #2759

Re: findfont vs selectfont

From Carlos <angus@quovadis.com.ar>
Newsgroups comp.lang.postscript
Subject Re: findfont vs selectfont
Date 2016-08-12 16:17 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <noklpl$6nl$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <31807400-680f-4f6f-a96d-3a79e79d474d@googlegroups.com> <noi472$b7k$1@dont-email.me> <01d6de9f-c5b5-4c9e-b54e-f2aab0f6e4f7@googlegroups.com> <nok88d$qc7$1@dont-email.me> <MPG.3217b6f27413bcc698990c@usenet.plus.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 12/08/2016 12:36, ken wrote:
> In article <nok88d$qc7$1@dont-email.me>, angus@quovadis.com.ar says...
>
>> /currentfontheight {
>>       currentfont /FontMatrix get 3 get
>>       currentfont /OrigFont get /FontMatrix get 3 get
>>       div
>> } bind def
>>
>> but now I wonder whether all fonts have an OrigFont entry...
>
> No, they don't. Are you using Ghostscript by any chance ?

Yes. So, I assume this is a ghostscriptism?

-- 

Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: findfont vs selectfont jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 04:39 -0700
  Re: findfont vs selectfont Carlos <angus@quovadis.com.ar> - 2016-08-11 17:05 +0200
    Re: findfont vs selectfont jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 02:28 -0700
      Re: findfont vs selectfont Carlos <angus@quovadis.com.ar> - 2016-08-12 12:26 +0200
        Re: findfont vs selectfont ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2016-08-12 11:36 +0100
          Re: findfont vs selectfont Carlos <angus@quovadis.com.ar> - 2016-08-12 16:17 +0200
            Re: findfont vs selectfont ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2016-08-12 15:53 +0100
              Re: findfont vs selectfont luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 14:09 -0700

csiph-web