Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #2614

Re: Anticlip

Newsgroups comp.lang.postscript
Date 2016-06-03 02:15 -0700
References <1114446133.473394.163500@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> <426d3ecd.809318318@read.news.uk.uu.net> <3d3e1626-047c-448c-bc9b-0ff7367d4117@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <e66bc916-ea4f-4459-8048-b141c7ca2252@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Anticlip
From jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


> The enclosing large rectangle is the right idea, but you don’t need to use eoclip. Simply give it the opposite direction to your inner path segments, and the winding-number rule can do the rest <https://www.cairographics.org/cookbook/outside_clipping/>.

Yes, for well-constructed paths. But for paths made with strokepath it fails — all those complicated self-intersections are too nasty.

Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Anticlip Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 21:52 -0700
  Re: Anticlip luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-02 22:27 -0700
  Re: Anticlip jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 02:15 -0700
    Re: Anticlip Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 18:06 -0700
      Re: Anticlip jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 02:55 -0700
        Re: Anticlip jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 04:53 -0700

csiph-web