Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #1056
| From | Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
| Subject | Re: What language was the "original" Postscript interpreter written in? |
| Date | 2012-11-17 08:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <agppugFhligU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <k86k8q$1sl$1@dont-email.me> |
On 11/16/2012 5:03 PM, luser.droog wrote: > I know Helmar was implementing array-"operators" very early in his > interpreter so that as much as possible could be built on top of a simpler > core. And ghostscript's docs express a an interest in replacing c-level > operators with higher-level ps equivalents in a similar drive towards > portability. > > What is the subset of Postscript necessary to implement the rest of > Postscript using it? And what did Adobe use to create this core? M68000 > Assembly? Or did they use C? or some weird custom Alto tool? > > PostScript was largely based on the concepts of Forth. Third cousin, twice removed. -- Many thanks, Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073 Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552 rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: don@tinaja.com Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What language was the "original" Postscript interpreter written in? "luser.droog" <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2012-11-16 18:03 -0600
Re: What language was the "original" Postscript interpreter written in? Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> - 2012-11-17 08:48 -0700
Re: What language was the "original" Postscript interpreter written in? "luser.droog" <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2012-11-19 00:56 -0600
Re: What language was the "original" Postscript interpreter written in? luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2013-07-19 23:34 -0700
csiph-web