Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #1698
| From | ken <ken@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
| Subject | Re: best dictionary algorithm? |
| Date | 2011-02-03 10:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.27b48d54adf27d0989814@usenet.plus.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <b411a13e-22cd-48f2-a3e4-5b125611aa72@d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <9e95c60f-0549-4050-a3d2-a39243dd58d5@l17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <e8e27cac-b69f-4d6f-bd8b-c13d06fadf73@d28g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <da49c190-2511-4cd5-9137-da7f14fabaed@s11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <b3570de8-babe-4b91-b19b-8d9a5c0bbece@r16g2000yql.googlegroups.com> |
In article <b3570de8-babe-4b91-b19b- 8d9a5c0bbece@r16g2000yql.googlegroups.com>, mijoryx@yahoo.com says... > But the bad news is it chokes on an integer that > exceeds the precision of a real. > > GS>16#7ffffff0 42 def > GS>16#7ffffff0 cvr load > Error: /undefined in --execute-- > Operand stack: > 2.14748e+09 And the Distiller result: %%[ Error: undefined; OffendingCommand: load ]%% Stack: 2.14748e+09 > But using the integer still works: > > GS>16#7ffffff0 load > GS<1>= > 42 Again, Acrobat Distiller has the same result. Ken
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: best dictionary algorithm? ThomasW <zupftom@googlemail.com> - 2011-01-30 07:44 -0800
Re: best dictionary algorithm? luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2011-02-03 00:32 -0800
Re: best dictionary algorithm? ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2011-02-03 10:01 +0000
Re: best dictionary algorithm? ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2011-02-03 09:57 +0000
Re: best dictionary algorithm? luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2011-02-03 00:46 -0800
csiph-web