Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #1911
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-23 00:49 -0700 |
| References | <b5857ab9-2bda-4f40-a1f3-0481c4da2f5c@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <1d458f8a-e03b-4145-8bb9-c532fe5cc006@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Which is more elegant? Which is more PostScript-like (version 2) |
| From | jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> |
The code will be deep inside other {...} executable arrays, so all the marks should be immediately executed: //mark.
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Which is more elegant? Which is more PostScript-like (version 2) jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2014-05-22 14:12 -0700
Re: Which is more elegant? Which is more PostScript-like (version 2) luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-22 15:02 -0700
Re: Which is more elegant? Which is more PostScript-like (version 2) luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-22 15:15 -0700
Re: Which is more elegant? Which is more PostScript-like (version 2) luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-25 00:08 -0700
Re: Which is more elegant? Which is more PostScript-like (version 2) jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2014-05-22 16:17 -0700
Re: Which is more elegant? Which is more PostScript-like (version 2) jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2014-05-23 00:49 -0700
csiph-web