Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.php > #12578 > unrolled thread

how did I wind up with double headers?

Started byrichard <member@newsguy.com>
First post2014-01-11 15:00 -0500
Last post2014-01-12 03:00 +0000
Articles 15 — 9 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.php


Contents

  how did I wind up with double headers? richard <member@newsguy.com> - 2014-01-11 15:00 -0500
    Re: how did I wind up with double headers? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2014-01-11 21:00 +0000
    Re: how did I wind up with double headers? Doug Miller <doug_at_milmac_dot_com@example.com> - 2014-01-11 21:07 +0000
    Re: how did I wind up with double headers? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-01-11 22:07 +0100
    Re: how did I wind up with double headers? Doug Miller <doug_at_milmac_dot_com@example.com> - 2014-01-11 21:08 +0000
      Re: how did I wind up with double headers? "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2014-01-11 22:04 +0000
        Re: how did I wind up with double headers? Dave Pyles <dave@user.invalid> - 2014-01-11 18:19 -0500
        Re: how did I wind up with double headers? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-01-11 19:23 -0500
        Re: how did I wind up with double headers? Doug Miller <doug_at_milmac_dot_com@example.com> - 2014-01-12 00:30 +0000
    Re: how did I wind up with double headers? richard <member@newsguy.com> - 2014-01-11 18:18 -0500
      Re: how did I wind up with double headers? "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2014-01-12 00:20 +0000
      Re: how did I wind up with double headers? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-01-12 01:18 +0100
      Re: how did I wind up with double headers? Doug Miller <doug_at_milmac_dot_com@example.com> - 2014-01-12 00:37 +0000
    Re: how did I wind up with double headers? Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2014-01-11 17:29 -0800
    Re: how did I wind up with double headers? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2014-01-12 03:00 +0000

#12578 — how did I wind up with double headers?

Fromrichard <member@newsguy.com>
Date2014-01-11 15:00 -0500
Subjecthow did I wind up with double headers?
Message-ID<1iz6hl98tu34s$.6mf0ex4z93no.dlg@40tude.net>
http://mroldies.net/home.php

View the page source.
You will see I have two sets of headers.
Yet, the original document does not!
Where in the hell did the extra headers come from?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#12579

FromDenis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com>
Date2014-01-11 21:00 +0000
Message-ID<lasbcu$fth$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#12578
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:00:48 -0500, richard wrote:

> http://mroldies.net/home.php
> 
> View the page source.
> You will see I have two sets of headers.

No you don't. The error is more fundamental than that. You appear to have 
nested a whole html document inside the body section of another html 
document.

Please add "I am wholly unable to perceive the magnitude and scope of my 
coding fuck ups." to your cv.

> Yet, the original document does not!
> Where in the hell did the extra headers come from?

The error comes from your fucked up code. Beyond that, it really is 
impossible to say precisely how you fucked up, although the chances are 
quite high that it is in some way a repetition of a previous fuck up.

-- 
Denis McMahon, denismfmcmahon@gmail.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12580

FromDoug Miller <doug_at_milmac_dot_com@example.com>
Date2014-01-11 21:07 +0000
Message-ID<XnsA2B2A4040ADF0dougmilmaccom@78.46.70.116>
In reply to#12578
richard <member@newsguy.com> wrote in news:1iz6hl98tu34s$.6mf0ex4z93no.dlg@
40tude.net:

> http://mroldies.net/home.php
> 
> View the page source.
> You will see I have two sets of headers.

Maybe *you* should view the page source. You have a lot more than that duplicated.

> Yet, the original document does not!

When will you ever learn to validate?
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fmroldies.net%2Fhome.php&charset=%
28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0

> Where in the hell did the extra headers come from?

Probably the same place the *entire*extra*HTML*document* came from... ya think?
This page has two each of darn near everything.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12581

FromThomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Date2014-01-11 22:07 +0100
Message-ID<1456351.8oNpGW8y5a@PointedEars.de>
In reply to#12578
At the risk of feeding a troll… – why isn't my killfile working?

richard wrote:

> http://mroldies.net/home.php
> 
> View the page source.
> You will see I have two sets of headers.

Those are not headers, but “head” elements.

> Yet, the original document does not!
> Where in the hell did the extra headers come from?

You have messed up your PHP program again – duplicate includes?

Regarding preserving music from the 1960s: Ever heard of Spotify [1]?  Do a 
service to humanity – and yourself: what about copyright? –, stop your 
project, and learn programming on something a lot more simple; if you can.  
TIA.


PointedEars
___________
[1] <http://www.spotify.com/>
-- 
Prototype.js was written by people who don't know javascript for people
who don't know javascript. People who don't know javascript are not
the best source of advice on designing systems that use javascript.
  -- Richard Cornford, cljs, <f806at$ail$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12582

FromDoug Miller <doug_at_milmac_dot_com@example.com>
Date2014-01-11 21:08 +0000
Message-ID<XnsA2B2A447FAF9Edougmilmaccom@78.46.70.116>
In reply to#12578
richard <member@newsguy.com> wrote in news:1iz6hl98tu34s$.6mf0ex4z93no.dlg@
40tude.net:

> Where in the hell did the extra headers come from?

How in the hell do you expect anybody to answer that? WE CAN'T SEE YOUR PHP CODE.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12583

From"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid>
Date2014-01-11 22:04 +0000
Message-ID<lasf5r$60u$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#12582
Doug Miller wrote:

> richard the sto0pid wrote:
>> Where in the hell did the extra headers come from?
> 
> How in the hell do you expect anybody to answer that? WE CAN'T SEE YOUR
> PHP CODE.

Prace bets now. His PHP code has a "=" instead of a "==".

[ ] Yes   [ ] No

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12584

FromDave Pyles <dave@user.invalid>
Date2014-01-11 18:19 -0500
Message-ID<lasjhs$6ff$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#12583
On 1/11/2014 5:04 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> Doug Miller wrote:
>
>> richard the sto0pid wrote:
>>> Where in the hell did the extra headers come from?
>>
>> How in the hell do you expect anybody to answer that? WE CAN'T SEE YOUR
>> PHP CODE.
>
> Prace bets now. His PHP code has a "=" instead of a "==".
>
> [ ] Yes   [ ] No
>

  [X] Yes   [ ] No

Dave Pyles

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12587

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2014-01-11 19:23 -0500
Message-ID<lasn9t$o6b$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#12583
On 1/11/2014 5:04 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> Doug Miller wrote:
>
>> richard the sto0pid wrote:
>>> Where in the hell did the extra headers come from?
>>
>> How in the hell do you expect anybody to answer that? WE CAN'T SEE YOUR
>> PHP CODE.
>
> Prace bets now. His PHP code has a "=" instead of a "==".
>
> [ ] Yes   [ ] No
>

Sorry, I don't take sucker bets :)

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12588

FromDoug Miller <doug_at_milmac_dot_com@example.com>
Date2014-01-12 00:30 +0000
Message-ID<XnsA2B2C65C91492dougmilmaccom@78.46.70.116>
In reply to#12583
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote in news:lasf5r$60u$1
@dont-email.me:

> 
> Prace bets now. His PHP code has a "=" instead of a "==".
> 
> [X ] Yes   [ ] No
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12585

Fromrichard <member@newsguy.com>
Date2014-01-11 18:18 -0500
Message-ID<g6azku8wa1qg.10do8re9dcoe6$.dlg@40tude.net>
In reply to#12578
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:00:48 -0500, richard wrote:

> http://mroldies.net/home.php
> 
> View the page source.
> You will see I have two sets of headers.
> Yet, the original document does not!
> Where in the hell did the extra headers come from?

For you whiners that insist, here's the damn whole page with code.

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <meta charset="utf-8">
    <title>Mr Oldies Preserving Rock and Roll Forever!</title>

    <style>
	
	</style>



	
</head>
  
<body>

<?php

$go=$_GET['a'];
if(empty($go)){$go=0;}

if ($go==0){include "http://mroldies.net/home1.php";}
if ($go==1){include "http://mroldies.net/test/index2.php";}
if ($go==2){include "http://mroldies.net/radio/24hours.php";}



?>


</body>
</html>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12586

From"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid>
Date2014-01-12 00:20 +0000
Message-ID<lasn49$leh$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#12585
richard the sto0pid wrote:

> richard the sto0pid wrote:
>> http://mroldies.net/home.php
>> 
>> View the page source.
>> You will see I have two sets of headers.
>> Yet, the original document does not!
>> Where in the hell did the extra headers come from?
> 
> For you whiners that insist, here's the damn whole page with code.
> 
> <!DOCTYPE html>
> <html lang="en">
>   <head>
>     <meta charset="utf-8">
>     <title>Mr Oldies Preserving Rock and Roll Forever!</title>
> 
>     <style>
> 	
> 	</style>
> 
> </head>
>   
> <body>
> 
> <?php
> 
> $go=$_GET['a'];
> if(empty($go)){$go=0;}
> 
> if ($go==0){include "http://mroldies.net/home1.php";}
> if ($go==1){include "http://mroldies.net/test/index2.php";}
> if ($go==2){include "http://mroldies.net/radio/24hours.php";}

If you were smart enough, you would use an if/elseif or a switch command 
there, saving processing time. But that's beyond your meager abilities.

> ?>
> 
> 
> </body>
> </html>

And if you had even a modicum of ability, you would know that each one of 
those possible includes *already has* html, head, and body elements.

It's so simple, even a child could understand it.

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12589

FromThomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Date2014-01-12 01:18 +0100
Message-ID<4555789.NIToQkNJ70@PointedEars.de>
In reply to#12585
richard wrote:

> On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:00:48 -0500, richard wrote:
>> http://mroldies.net/home.php
>> 
>> View the page source.
>> You will see I have two sets of headers.
>> Yet, the original document does not!
>> Where in the hell did the extra headers come from?
> 
> For you whiners that insist, here's the damn whole page with code.

Evidently, *you* are the whiner.
 
> <!DOCTYPE html>
> <html lang="en">
>   <head>
>     <meta charset="utf-8">
>     <title>Mr Oldies Preserving Rock and Roll Forever!</title>
> 
>     <style>
> 
> </style>

Remove that empty “style” element.

> 
> 
> 

Why all those empty lines?

> </head>
>   
> <body>
> 
> <?php
> 
> $go=$_GET['a'];
> if(empty($go)){$go=0;}
> 
> if ($go==0){include "http://mroldies.net/home1.php";}

(null == 0) and ("" == 0), so if you compare like this (with type juggling), 
you can skip the initialization.

> if ($go==1){include "http://mroldies.net/test/index2.php";}
> if ($go==2){include "http://mroldies.net/radio/24hours.php";}

As you have been told before: This will include whatever PHP *generates* 
from these resources, if it parses them on <http://mroldies.net/>.  Very 
likely you want to use the relative file paths instead of URIs, e. g. 
"home1.php".

It is also the worst possible way of selecting content for inclusion.
You could at least have used “switch” or a mapping array.

-- 
When all you know is jQuery, every problem looks $(olvable).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12590

FromDoug Miller <doug_at_milmac_dot_com@example.com>
Date2014-01-12 00:37 +0000
Message-ID<XnsA2B2C7A4634A2dougmilmaccom@78.46.70.116>
In reply to#12585
richard <member@newsguy.com> wrote in news:g6azku8wa1qg.10do8re9dcoe6$.dlg@
40tude.net:

> For you whiners that insist, here's the damn whole page with code.

Idiot. The only "whiner" here, RtS, is *you*.

You *still* have not figured out that *you* are the only one who can see your PHP code, and 
the only thing visible to the rest of the universe is the HTML that it generates, *not* the script 
itself -- which means that if you want us to tell you what's wrong with your PHP code, you  
HAVE TO include that code in your post. WE CANNOT SEE IT OTHERWISE.

> <!DOCTYPE html>
[...]
> <body>
> <?php
> $go=$_GET['a'];
> if(empty($go)){$go=0;}
> 
> if ($go==0){include "http://mroldies.net/home1.php";}

Aaaaaand there's your problem right there.

Hint: what's in that file that you're including?

> if ($go==1){include "http://mroldies.net/test/index2.php";}
> if ($go==2){include "http://mroldies.net/radio/24hours.php";}
> 
> 
> 
> ?>
> 
> 
> </body>
> </html>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12592

FromEvan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid>
Date2014-01-11 17:29 -0800
Message-ID<avr3d9pjcanvlh14397pvnrovb66etlfhs@4ax.com>
In reply to#12578
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:00:48 -0500, richard <member@newsguy.com>
wrote:

>http://mroldies.net/home.php
>
>View the page source.
>You will see I have two sets of headers.
>Yet, the original document does not!
>Where in the hell did the extra headers come from?

Obvious.

PRBKAC.
-- 
To reply via e-mail, remove The Obvious and .invalid from my e-mail address.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12598

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2014-01-12 03:00 +0000
Message-ID<lat0gv$dm1$2@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#12578
On 11/01/14 20:00, richard wrote:
> http://mroldies.net/home.php
>
> View the page source.
> You will see I have two sets of headers.
> Yet, the original document does not!
> Where in the hell did the extra headers come from?
>
probably you included something richard.

But knowing you, it could be almost anything.

-- 
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – a system of government where the least capable to 
lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the 
members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are 
rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a 
diminishing number of producers.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.php


csiph-web