Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.php > #10973 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-10-02 15:07 -0400 |
| Last post | 2013-10-04 08:32 +0100 |
| Articles | 8 on this page of 28 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.php
A general note on invalid.com and others like it Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> - 2013-10-02 15:07 -0400
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it Fiver <numeralfive@gmail.com> - 2013-10-02 21:46 +0200
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2013-10-02 17:07 -0500
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it Fiver <numeralfive@gmail.com> - 2013-10-03 00:31 +0200
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> - 2013-10-02 20:03 -0400
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it Fiver <numeralfive@gmail.com> - 2013-10-03 02:23 +0200
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-10-02 22:49 -0400
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> - 2013-10-03 14:06 -0400
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> - 2013-10-02 20:02 -0400
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-10-03 19:36 +0200
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-10-02 19:49 +0000
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-10-03 22:40 -0400
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-10-04 03:50 +0000
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-10-04 04:08 -0400
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-10-04 12:55 +0000
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-10-04 13:42 +0000
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-10-04 14:04 +0000
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> - 2013-10-04 19:33 -0400
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2013-10-05 13:54 -0500
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> - 2013-10-05 18:13 -0400
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-10-05 19:01 +0000
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> - 2013-10-05 18:16 -0400
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-10-06 01:47 +0000
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-10-05 22:45 -0400
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-10-06 02:54 +0000
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> - 2013-10-04 19:30 -0400
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-10-03 22:44 -0400
Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-04 08:32 +0100
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-10-05 19:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <l2pnml$pl8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #11287 |
Twayne wrote: > You forget, invalid.com will load into your browser; they used to have > email addresses too, before the registrars started threatening them. > example.com is in the same boat with several derivatives already > floating around. They are not the same. Peter has already explained that to you. > Bass turds like you abound around the 'net. Persons-without-clue, such as yourself, are even more prevalent. -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-10-05 18:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <l2q33m$2hk$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #11297 |
On 2013-10-05 3:01 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: > Twayne wrote: > >> You forget, invalid.com will load into your browser; they used to have >> email addresses too, before the registrars started threatening them. >> example.com is in the same boat with several derivatives already >> floating around. > > They are not the same. Peter has already explained that to you. > >> Bass turds like you abound around the 'net. > > Persons-without-clue, such as yourself, are even more prevalent. > LOL, you're a real gag on the ass of progress, aren't you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-10-06 01:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <l2qfg0$jkp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #11300 |
Twayne, a person-without-clue, wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> Twayne wrote: >>> You forget, invalid.com will load into your browser; they used to have >>> email addresses too, before the registrars started threatening them. >>> example.com is in the same boat with several derivatives already >>> floating around. >> >> They are not the same. Peter has already explained that to you. >> >>> Bass turds like you abound around the 'net. >> >> Persons-without-clue, such as yourself, are even more prevalent. > > LOL, you're a real gag on the ass of progress, aren't you? One day you might wake up and understand. I don't expect it will be soon, though. You and knowledge: never the twayne shall meet. -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-10-05 22:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <l2qis7$35n$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #11301 |
On 10/5/2013 9:47 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: > Twayne, a person-without-clue, wrote: > >> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >>> Twayne wrote: >>>> You forget, invalid.com will load into your browser; they used to have >>>> email addresses too, before the registrars started threatening them. >>>> example.com is in the same boat with several derivatives already >>>> floating around. >>> >>> They are not the same. Peter has already explained that to you. >>> >>>> Bass turds like you abound around the 'net. >>> >>> Persons-without-clue, such as yourself, are even more prevalent. >> >> LOL, you're a real gag on the ass of progress, aren't you? > > One day you might wake up and understand. I don't expect it will be soon, > though. You and knowledge: never the twayne shall meet. > ROFLMAO. Best I've heard in a long time, Beauregard! -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle JDS Computer Training Corp. jstucklex@attglobal.net ==================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-10-06 02:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <l2qjdv$43h$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #11302 |
Jerry Stuckle wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> Twayne, a person-without-clue, wrote: >>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >>>> Twayne wrote: >>>>> You forget, invalid.com will load into your browser; they used to >>>>> have email addresses too, before the registrars started threatening >>>>> them. >>>>> example.com is in the same boat with several derivatives >>>>> already floating around. >>>> >>>> They are not the same. Peter has already explained that to you. >>>> >>>>> Bass turds like you abound around the 'net. >>>> >>>> Persons-without-clue, such as yourself, are even more prevalent. >>> >>> LOL, you're a real gag on the ass of progress, aren't you? >> >> One day you might wake up and understand. I don't expect it will be >> soon, though. You and knowledge: never the twayne shall meet. > > ROFLMAO. Best I've heard in a long time, Beauregard! Rudyard is probably rolling over in his grave, too, I'll bet. ;-) -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-10-04 19:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <l2nj35$mj6$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #10998 |
On 2013-10-03 10:40 PM, richard wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 19:49:34 +0000 (UTC), Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>
>> Twayne wrote:
>>
>>> Just an idle comment on those who use invalid.com for e-mail addresses:
>>>
>>> invalid.com is a legit e-mail address; try it.
>>
>> Better is to use example.com as it is designed for the purpose. Even
>> better than that is example.invalid
>>
>> Any made-up user name to the left of the @ that uses a valid domain name
>> to the right will flood the server of the owner of that valid domain,
>> regardless if the user name is legitimate or not.a
>>
>> Thanks for pointing out this problem.
>
> Really? I wasn't aware that simply posting an addy cause email to be sent
> to that addy.
> Is this some new feature of usenet?
>
No, it's an issue that's been around since the beginnings of today's
version of e-mails.
But at the same time all ISPs simply drop junk mails, where they
have no recipient, on the floor and add them to lists people can
subscribe to of known spammers' addresses after they've been traced.
Very few of them accept the mail and try to deliver it anywhere. But at
the same time if there IS a valid recipient, the ISPs try to decide
whether it's spam or not and just notify the user that they caught a
spam which they can look at if they wish for a short period of time. It
helps their customer's e-mail boxes by keeping out many spam sources
from being delivered.
Twayne`
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | richard <noreply@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-10-03 22:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8vvx03hzgfyr$.1xvkan5mtov1l$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #10973 |
On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 15:07:06 -0400, Twayne wrote: > Just an idle comment on those who use invalid.com for e-mail addresses: > > invalid.com is a legit e-mail address; try it. BARF! Just use a TLD that isn't registered. such as @shut.the.fuck.up.stupid
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-10-04 08:32 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <l2lqv0$25g$2@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #10999 |
On 04/10/13 03:44, richard wrote: > On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 15:07:06 -0400, Twayne wrote: > >> Just an idle comment on those who use invalid.com for e-mail addresses: >> >> invalid.com is a legit e-mail address; try it. > > BARF! > > Just use a TLD that isn't registered. > such as @shut.the.fuck.up.stupid > THAT will cause the ROOT servres to be questioned every time. anti-social. -- Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.php
csiph-web