Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.php > #9264 > unrolled thread

bug in is_numeric

Started byfred <email@address.com>
First post2013-05-12 15:22 +0100
Last post2013-05-15 13:11 +0200
Articles 20 on this page of 141 — 20 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.php


Contents

  bug in  is_numeric fred <email@address.com> - 2013-05-12 15:22 +0100
    Re: bug in  is_numeric Salvatore <sal@yojimbo.hack.invalid> - 2013-05-12 15:31 +0000
      Re: bug in  is_numeric Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-05-12 17:55 +0200
      Re: bug in  is_numeric Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-05-12 17:58 +0200
      Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2013-05-12 18:06 +0200
      Re: bug in  is_numeric Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 16:24 +0000
      Re: bug in  is_numeric fred <email@address.com> - 2013-05-12 18:41 +0100
        Re: bug in  is_numeric Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2013-05-13 13:50 +0200
          Re: bug in  is_numeric fred <email@address.com> - 2013-05-13 14:58 +0100
            Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-13 10:11 -0400
              Re: bug in  is_numeric fred <email@address.com> - 2013-05-13 15:15 +0100
                Re: bug in  is_numeric Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2013-05-13 17:29 +0200
                Re: bug in  is_numeric "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2013-05-13 19:55 +0200
                Re: bug in  is_numeric Richard Yates <richard@yatesguitar.com> - 2013-05-14 06:41 -0700
                  Re: bug in  is_numeric SwissCheese <swisscheese@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-05-14 21:43 -0400
                    Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-14 23:01 -0400
                      Re: bug in  is_numeric SwissCheese <swisscheese@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-05-15 05:48 -0400
                        Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-15 06:11 -0400
                          Re: bug in  is_numeric SwissCheese <swisscheese@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-05-16 18:36 -0400
                        Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-15 15:19 +0200
                          Re: bug in  is_numeric Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2013-05-15 20:23 +0200
                            Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-15 20:49 +0200
                              Re: bug in  is_numeric Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2013-05-15 21:58 +0200
                                Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-15 22:20 +0200
                                  Re: bug in  is_numeric Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2013-05-15 22:42 +0200
                                Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2013-05-15 23:53 +0200
                                  Re: bug in  is_numeric Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2013-05-16 00:29 +0200
                                    Re: bug in  is_numeric Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2013-05-16 00:40 +0200
                                    Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-16 05:00 +0200
                              Re: bug in  is_numeric SwissCheese <swisscheese@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-05-16 18:16 -0400
                                Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-17 00:45 +0200
                                  Re: bug in  is_numeric SwissCheese <swisscheese@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-05-16 22:52 -0400
                                    Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-17 18:33 +0200
                                      Re: bug in  is_numeric Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2013-05-17 20:39 +0200
                                        Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-17 23:45 +0200
                                          Re: bug in  is_numeric Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2013-05-18 14:47 +0200
                      Re: bug in  is_numeric SwissCheese <swisscheese@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-05-15 20:57 -0400
                        Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-16 00:09 -0400
                          Re: bug in  is_numeric Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2013-05-17 01:17 +0200
                            Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-16 20:30 -0400
                              Re: bug in  is_numeric Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2013-05-18 14:51 +0200
                                Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-18 10:07 -0400
                                  Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-18 11:56 -0500
                                    Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-18 14:32 -0400
                                      Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-18 22:24 +0200
                                        Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-18 17:01 -0400
                                      Re: bug in  is_numeric Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-05-18 21:58 +0000
                                        Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-18 19:21 -0400
                                          Re: bug in  is_numeric Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-05-19 02:22 +0000
                                            Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-18 22:41 -0400
                                              Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-19 05:28 -0500
                                                Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-19 09:42 -0400
                                                  Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-19 11:42 -0500
                                                    Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-19 14:39 -0400
                                                      Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-21 01:01 -0500
                                                        Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-21 05:59 -0400
                                            Re: bug in  is_numeric The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-19 07:49 +0100
                                              Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-19 05:31 -0500
                                                Re: bug in  is_numeric The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-19 12:39 +0100
                                                  Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-19 09:43 -0400
                                                    Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-19 11:52 -0500
                                                      Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-19 14:42 -0400
                                                        Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-21 01:03 -0500
                                                          Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-21 06:00 -0400
                                                  Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-19 11:45 -0500
                                          Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-19 05:27 -0500
                                            Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-19 09:45 -0400
                                              Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-19 11:37 -0500
                                                Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-19 14:43 -0400
                                                  Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-21 00:59 -0500
                                                    Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-21 06:02 -0400
                                      Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-18 17:08 -0500
                                        Re: bug in  is_numeric The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-18 23:58 +0100
                                        Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-18 19:22 -0400
                                      Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-18 17:11 -0500
                                        Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-18 19:23 -0400
                                          Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-19 05:35 -0500
                                            Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-19 09:46 -0400
                                              Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-19 11:23 -0500
                                                Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-19 14:44 -0400
                                                  Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-21 00:54 -0500
                                                    Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-21 06:03 -0400
                                                      Re: bug in  is_numeric fred <email@address.com> - 2013-05-23 15:38 +0100
                                                      Re: bug in  is_numeric Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-06-01 17:36 +0200
                                                        Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-06-01 14:54 -0400
                                                          Re: bug in  is_numeric Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-06-05 15:25 +0200
                                                            Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-06-05 10:34 -0400
                                                              Re: bug in  is_numeric Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-06-05 17:02 +0200
                                                                Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-06-05 12:30 -0400
                                                                  OT: What you say is not always what you mean (was: Re: bug in  is_numeric) Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-06-05 20:20 +0200
                                                                    Re: OT: What you say is not always what you mean Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-06-05 14:40 -0400
                                    Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-18 21:51 +0200
                                      Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-18 17:13 -0500
                                        Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-19 00:49 +0200
                                          Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-19 05:24 -0500
                                            Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-19 12:40 +0200
                                              Re: bug in  is_numeric The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-19 12:43 +0100
                                              Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-19 11:29 -0500
                                  Re: bug in  is_numeric Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-05-18 14:53 -0400
                      Re: bug in  is_numeric SwissCheese <swisscheese@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-05-16 18:41 -0400
            Re: bug in  is_numeric Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-05-13 08:35 -0700
            Re: bug in  is_numeric Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 20:26 +0000
        Re: bug in  is_numeric Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 20:15 +0000
      Re: bug in  is_numeric Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2013-05-12 13:03 -0500
    Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-12 18:03 +0200
      Re: bug in  is_numeric fred <email@address.com> - 2013-05-12 18:34 +0100
        Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-12 19:40 +0200
          Re: bug in  is_numeric Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-05-12 21:51 +0200
    Re: bug in  is_numeric "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-12 11:47 -0500
      Re: bug in  is_numeric Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-05-12 18:56 +0200
      Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2013-05-12 19:05 +0200
        Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-12 19:38 +0200
          Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-12 19:46 +0200
          Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-12 14:11 -0400
            Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-12 20:39 +0200
              Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-12 16:51 -0400
                Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-13 01:27 +0200
                  Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-12 20:35 -0400
                    Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-13 11:07 +0200
                      Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-13 09:02 -0400
                        Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-13 16:57 +0200
                          Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-13 17:10 +0200
                          Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-13 13:52 -0400
                            Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-13 20:28 +0200
                      Re: bug in  is_numeric SwissCheese <swisscheese@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-05-16 18:28 -0400
                        Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-17 00:33 +0200
                          Re: bug in  is_numeric SwissCheese <swisscheese@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-05-16 22:34 -0400
                            Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-18 10:28 +0200
                              Re: bug in  is_numeric Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-05-18 08:00 -0400
                                Re: bug in  is_numeric Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-05-18 14:18 +0200
                                Re: bug in  is_numeric Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-05-18 13:20 +0100
                                Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-18 08:47 -0400
                                Re: bug in  is_numeric The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-18 14:05 +0100
                                  Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-18 10:16 -0400
                                Re: bug in  is_numeric Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-05-18 16:14 +0200
    Re: bug in  is_numeric Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-05-14 10:34 +0200
      Re: bug in  is_numeric fred <email@address.com> - 2013-05-14 14:47 +0100
        Re: bug in  is_numeric Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 14:54 +0000
        Re: bug in  is_numeric Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-05-15 08:05 +0200
          Re: bug in  is_numeric Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-15 06:27 -0400
            Re: bug in  is_numeric Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2013-05-15 13:11 +0200

Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8  Next page →


#9466

From"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net>
Date2013-05-19 11:52 -0500
Message-ID<0r7mt.3587$ZU7.1052@newsfe28.iad>
In reply to#9456
"Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:knakmd$oi1$2@dont-email.me...

> In this case I agree with Sanders.  Much more well reasoned than your 
> tripe.

This happens a lot with the Republican fringes - especially the 
Libertarians.
They see someone who's wrong being schooled and they join in - so they can 
finally feel like they're right about something.

But then their character comes out and they rail about commie conspiracies 
and Kenyan spies and nobody takes them seriously.
So they change their fake ID and start all over again.

Anonymity was a great principle - for a news forum.
But for a threaded discussion forum - it just enables hecklers and vandals 
to piss on people without having to suffer the consequences.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9470

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2013-05-19 14:42 -0400
Message-ID<knb67i$r05$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#9466
On 5/19/2013 12:52 PM, Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:knakmd$oi1$2@dont-email.me...
>
>> In this case I agree with Sanders.  Much more well reasoned than your
>> tripe.
>
> This happens a lot with the Republican fringes - especially the
> Libertarians.


You don't even understand the difference between a Republican and a 
Libertarian.  They are not related at all.

> They see someone who's wrong being schooled and they join in - so they
> can finally feel like they're right about something.
>

No, just pointing out it one of the few times in your life you've ever 
been right about anything.

> But then their character comes out and they rail about commie
> conspiracies and Kenyan spies and nobody takes them seriously.
> So they change their fake ID and start all over again.
>

So now you're coming up with commie theories?  How long before you 
invoke Godwin's Law?

> Anonymity was a great principle - for a news forum.
> But for a threaded discussion forum - it just enables hecklers and
> vandals to piss on people without having to suffer the consequences.
>

Yes, there are a few like that here.


-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9487

From"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net>
Date2013-05-21 01:03 -0500
Message-ID<_6Emt.2554$tp3.1359@newsfe23.iad>
In reply to#9470
"Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:knb67i$r05$1@dont-email.me...

>You don't even understand the difference between a Republican and a 
>Libertarian.  They are not related at all.

Yeah, right - not related at all - gotcha.
Rand and Ron Paul are in for a heck of a surprise when you tell them they've 
been getting it wrong all these years.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9492

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2013-05-21 06:00 -0400
Message-ID<knfgbq$b58$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#9487
On 5/21/2013 2:03 AM, Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:knb67i$r05$1@dont-email.me...
>
>> You don't even understand the difference between a Republican and a
>> Libertarian.  They are not related at all.
>
> Yeah, right - not related at all - gotcha.
> Rand and Ron Paul are in for a heck of a surprise when you tell them
> they've been getting it wrong all these years.
>
>

Once again you have no idea what you're talking about.  But that's 
pretty standard for you.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9465

From"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net>
Date2013-05-19 11:45 -0500
Message-ID<Kk7mt.3555$Pt5.3509@newsfe02.iad>
In reply to#9449
"The Natural Philosopher"  wrote in message 
news:knadkl$t97$1@news.albasani.net...

>Alway nice to see carefully researched well reasoned comments :-)

If you want to be taken seriously, you have to behave like a serious person.
Ranting about commie conspiracies is not the path to that goal.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9442

From"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net>
Date2013-05-19 05:27 -0500
Message-ID<vO1mt.16855$JB5.4480@newsfe26.iad>
In reply to#9435
"Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:kn9272$bcv$1@dont-email.me... 

> Nope.  RFC1036 defines the "References" header used to refer to a 
> previous message.  It is a part of the Use net protocol.

There are protocols usenet uses, but there is no usenet protocol.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9457

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2013-05-19 09:45 -0400
Message-ID<knakq9$oi1$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#9442
On 5/19/2013 6:27 AM, Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:kn9272$bcv$1@dont-email.me...
>> Nope.  RFC1036 defines the "References" header used to refer to a
>> previous message.  It is a part of the Use net protocol.
>
> There are protocols usenet uses, but there is no usenet protocol.
>

Wrong again.  Check the RFCs.  Usenet has its own protocol - separate 
from HTTP, SMTP, etc.

Why do you think it is called "Network News Transfer PROTOCOL"?

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9463

From"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net>
Date2013-05-19 11:37 -0500
Message-ID<Id7mt.1773$rW2.589@newsfe05.iad>
In reply to#9457
"Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:knakq9$oi1$3@dont-email.me...

>Wrong again.  Check the RFCs.  Usenet has its own protocol - separate from 
>HTTP, SMTP, etc.

Of course usenet HAS protocols.  Nobody claimed otherwise.
But you said that usenet IS a protocol - and that's patently false.

Usenet is not a protocol.
The world wide web is not a protocol.
Facebook is not a protocol.
They all use protocols, but are not themselves protocols.

And while we're at it - your monitor is not a computer and no, I can't 
install Microsoft on your mouse.  ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9471

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2013-05-19 14:43 -0400
Message-ID<knb69p$r05$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#9463
On 5/19/2013 12:37 PM, Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:knakq9$oi1$3@dont-email.me...
>
>> Wrong again.  Check the RFCs.  Usenet has its own protocol - separate
>> from HTTP, SMTP, etc.
>
> Of course usenet HAS protocols.  Nobody claimed otherwise.
> But you said that usenet IS a protocol - and that's patently false.
>
> Usenet is not a protocol.
> The world wide web is not a protocol.
> Facebook is not a protocol.
> They all use protocols, but are not themselves protocols.
>
> And while we're at it - your monitor is not a computer and no, I can't
> install Microsoft on your mouse.  ;)
>

No one ever claimed Usenet was a protocol.  But there is a Usenet 
protocol.  You're trying to split words - and it doesn't work.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9485

From"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net>
Date2013-05-21 00:59 -0500
Message-ID<u3Emt.8155$kj3.6845@newsfe16.iad>
In reply to#9471
"Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:knb69p$r05$2@dont-email.me...

> You're trying to split words - and it doesn't work.

No, "splitting words" is something else entirely.
What I did was to speak honestly.

See, that's your bad character overwhelming your intellect... again.
Normally, you prefer precision speaking - except when it proves you wrong.
When that happens, your victim mentality kicks in and you get defensive and 
say stupid things.

That's why here you said both that Usenet is a protocol, and that it is not.
It's not an intellectual shortcoming; it's a character flaw. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9493

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2013-05-21 06:02 -0400
Message-ID<knfgf1$b58$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#9485
On 5/21/2013 1:59 AM, Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:knb69p$r05$2@dont-email.me...
>
>> You're trying to split words - and it doesn't work.
>
> No, "splitting words" is something else entirely.
> What I did was to speak honestly.
>
> See, that's your bad character overwhelming your intellect... again.
> Normally, you prefer precision speaking - except when it proves you wrong.
> When that happens, your victim mentality kicks in and you get defensive
> and say stupid things.
>
> That's why here you said both that Usenet is a protocol, and that it is
> not.
> It's not an intellectual shortcoming; it's a character flaw.

Once again, you're wrong.  However, you have to resort to the ad hominem 
attacks in a futile attempt to prove you're better than others.

How like the troll.

And in psychological terms, it's called "transference" - when you blame 
someone else for your own flaws.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9430

From"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net>
Date2013-05-18 17:08 -0500
Message-ID<xZSlt.9430$Ve3.961@newsfe12.iad>
In reply to#9424
"Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:kn8h95$khj$1@dont-email.me... 

>You obviously haven't been around enough. It was a discussion forum back 
>the 70's when it was on ARPANET.  It had threading back then, also.

Personal attack not withstanding - nobody claimed otherwise.
So, you're just arguing with yourself.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9434

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2013-05-18 23:58 +0100
Message-ID<kn912q$cbv$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#9430
On 18/05/13 23:08, Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:kn8h95$khj$1@dont-email.me...
>> You obviously haven't been around enough. It was a discussion forum 
>> back the 70's when it was on ARPANET. It had threading back then, also.
>
> Personal attack not withstanding - nobody claimed otherwise.
> So, you're just arguing with yourself.
>
>
I see jerry is totally wrong, as usual

Thank Clapton for killfiles


-- 
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9436

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2013-05-18 19:22 -0400
Message-ID<kn9291$bcv$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#9430
On 5/18/2013 6:08 PM, Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:kn8h95$khj$1@dont-email.me...
>> You obviously haven't been around enough. It was a discussion forum
>> back the 70's when it was on ARPANET.  It had threading back then, also.
>
> Personal attack not withstanding - nobody claimed otherwise.
> So, you're just arguing with yourself.
>
>

Incorrect.  To quote you:


"Usenet wasn't meant to be a discussion group at all - it was meant to 
be a forum for uncensored reporting.
That's what the second N in NNTP stands for.
Threading is just an evolutionary remnant of it's SMTP heritage, and the 
reason why Usenet devolved away from being a news forum. "

That is completely incorrect.


-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9431

From"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net>
Date2013-05-18 17:11 -0500
Message-ID<20Tlt.2628$cs.2574@newsfe03.iad>
In reply to#9424
"Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:kn8h95$khj$1@dont-email.me... 

> It is a threaded discussion group, and threads exist for a reason.

Yupper - and that reason is to allow the discussion to morph as it will.
No hall monitor can stop it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9437

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2013-05-18 19:23 -0400
Message-ID<kn92ad$bcv$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#9431
On 5/18/2013 6:11 PM, Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:kn8h95$khj$1@dont-email.me...
>> It is a threaded discussion group, and threads exist for a reason.
>
> Yupper - and that reason is to allow the discussion to morph as it will.
> No hall monitor can stop it.
>
>

And this is a perfect example of why thread hijacking is frowned upon.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9445

From"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net>
Date2013-05-19 05:35 -0500
Message-ID<0W1mt.2642$cs.21@newsfe03.iad>
In reply to#9437
"Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:kn92ad$bcv$3@dont-email.me...
>On 5/18/2013 6:11 PM, Sanders Kaufman wrote:

>> Yupper - and that reason is to allow the discussion to morph as it will.
>> No hall monitor can stop it.
>
>And this is a perfect example of why thread hijacking is frowned upon.

Since you went along willijngly, it's not really a hijacking.
That's just your victim mentality taking over.
If you don't like the direction you've taken in your discussion, you have 
only yourself to blame.
It's just you, whining about how much you dislike the way you choose to 
spend your time.

Man up.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9458

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2013-05-19 09:46 -0400
Message-ID<knaksf$oi1$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#9445
On 5/19/2013 6:35 AM, Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:kn92ad$bcv$3@dont-email.me...
>> On 5/18/2013 6:11 PM, Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>
>>> Yupper - and that reason is to allow the discussion to morph as it will.
>>> No hall monitor can stop it.
>>
>> And this is a perfect example of why thread hijacking is frowned upon.
>
> Since you went along willijngly, it's not really a hijacking.
> That's just your victim mentality taking over.
> If you don't like the direction you've taken in your discussion, you
> have only yourself to blame.
> It's just you, whining about how much you dislike the way you choose to
> spend your time.
>
> Man up.
>

No, I did not go along willingly with Pointed Head's hijacking of the 
thread.

Stand up and take a load of your brains.  Then learn to read.


-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9460

From"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net>
Date2013-05-19 11:23 -0500
Message-ID<Z%6mt.5296$uT3.2962@newsfe20.iad>
In reply to#9458
"Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:knaksf$oi1$4@dont-email.me...

>No, I did not go along willingly with Pointed Head's hijacking of the 
>thread.

OK, assuming you're the victim you say you are...
- Who forced your hand and made you post those replies?
- Did you choose the wording, or was that forced on you as well.
- These folks who force you to post replies - do they make you to do other 
things, as well?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#9472

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2013-05-19 14:44 -0400
Message-ID<knb6be$r05$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#9460
On 5/19/2013 12:23 PM, Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:knaksf$oi1$4@dont-email.me...
>
>> No, I did not go along willingly with Pointed Head's hijacking of the
>> thread.
>
> OK, assuming you're the victim you say you are...
> - Who forced your hand and made you post those replies?
> - Did you choose the wording, or was that forced on you as well.
> - These folks who force you to post replies - do they make you to do
> other things, as well?
>
>

I never claimed I was a victim.  You're the only one who has brought 
that subject up.


-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.php


csiph-web