Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.php > #4844 > unrolled thread

photo gallery

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.php

Contents

  photo gallery richard <member@newsguy.com> - 2012-02-16 16:39 -0500
    Re: photo gallery Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2012-02-16 14:26 -0800
      Re: photo gallery richard <member@newsguy.com> - 2012-02-16 22:26 -0500
        Re: photo gallery Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2012-02-16 20:44 -0800
        Re: photo gallery Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-02-17 10:33 +0100
        Re: photo gallery Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-02-18 17:19 +0000
    Re: photo gallery Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 08:51 +0000
      Re: photo gallery "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-02-17 10:46 +0100
      Re: photo gallery richard <member@newsguy.com> - 2012-02-17 09:23 -0500
        Re: photo gallery Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-02-17 09:59 -0500
        Re: photo gallery Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2012-02-17 09:14 -0800
        Re: photo gallery The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-02-17 18:57 +0000
        Re: photo gallery Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-02-18 17:15 +0000
        Re: photo gallery Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-02-19 20:34 +0000
    Re: photo gallery Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2012-02-18 07:59 +1100
      Re: photo gallery richard <member@newsguy.com> - 2012-02-17 16:14 -0500
        Re: photo gallery Dave Pyles <dave@user.invalid> - 2012-02-17 17:06 -0500
          Re: photo gallery richard <member@newsguy.com> - 2012-02-17 18:22 -0500
            Re: photo gallery Doug Miller <doug_at_milmac_dot_com@example.com> - 2012-02-18 00:11 +0000
              Re: photo gallery Dave Pyles <dave@user.invalid> - 2012-02-17 19:23 -0500
                Re: photo gallery richard <member@newsguy.com> - 2012-02-17 21:01 -0500
              Re: photo gallery "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2012-02-18 01:38 +0000
              Re: photo gallery richard <member@newsguy.com> - 2012-02-17 21:00 -0500
                Re: photo gallery Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-02-17 21:58 -0500
                  Re: photo gallery richard <member@newsguy.com> - 2012-02-17 22:56 -0500
                    Re: photo gallery Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-02-17 23:06 -0500
                    Re: photo gallery Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-02-18 17:09 +0000
                    Re: photo gallery Doug Miller <doug_at_milmac_dot_com@example.com> - 2012-02-18 17:17 +0000
                    Re: photo gallery Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-02-18 20:02 +0100
                      Re: photo gallery Doug Miller <doug_at_milmac_dot_com@example.com> - 2012-02-18 19:17 +0000
                Re: photo gallery Doug Miller <doug_at_milmac_dot_com@example.com> - 2012-02-18 14:44 +0000
                  Re: photo gallery The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-02-18 16:30 +0000
            Re: photo gallery The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-02-18 03:39 +0000
            Re: photo gallery Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2012-02-18 08:32 -0800
        Re: photo gallery "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2012-02-17 22:08 +0000
        Re: photo gallery Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2012-02-17 17:35 -0800

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#4876

On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:23:20 -0500, Dave Pyles wrote:

> Doug Miller wrote:
>> richard<member@newsguy.com>  wrote in
>> news:h5tuer7vesjr$.lm79y8bdn04g$.dlg@40tude.net:
>>
>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:06:46 -0500, Dave Pyles wrote:
>>>
>>>> richard wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:59:51 +1100, Jeff North wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:39:28 -0500, in comp.lang.php richard
>>>>>> <member@newsguy.com>
>>>>>> <e07f2j3vkz2c.1bw7d0qdedrkm$.dlg@40tude.net>   wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> | Looking for a fairly simple photo gallery with a few features.
>>>>>>> | Menu on left with collapsing tree that allows only one branch
>>>>>>> | open at a time.
>>>>>>> | Thumbnails on right. with description.
>>>>>>> | When clicked on the full size image will appear in a modal
>>>>>>> | lightbox.
>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>> | You would think this would be fairly easy to find somewhere.
>>>>>>> | So far I haven't been able to locate what I want.
>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>> | If anyone knows of such a script available, please post a link
>>>>>>> | to it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Easy enough done.
>>>>>> When page is accessed use php to gather the folder information and
>>>>>> display in the left column (create hyperlinks for each folder name)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When a user clicks on the folder name use AJAX to retrieve the
>>>>>> folder contents and display the thumbnails on the main section of
>>>>>> the page.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Each image will call the modal lightbox to display the full sized
>>>>>> image.
>>>>>
>>>>> Precisely. Now where can I find the premade script to do that with?
>>>> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=php+image+gallery+script
>>>> Dave Pyles
>>>
>>> let me shove it up your ass for you.
>>>
>> Now *there* is an attitude that's bound to get you lots of help.
> His emails won't show up on my screen anymore.
> Dave Pyles

Then shove it up your high and mighty ass.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4874

Doug Miller wrote:

> richard the sto0pid wrote:
>> 
>> let me shove it up your ass for you.
>> 
> Now *there* is an attitude that's bound to get you lots of help.

Knowing he is that way and always has been, is why I did not volunteer to 
give him my existing script.

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4875

On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:11:26 +0000 (UTC), Doug Miller wrote:

> richard <member@newsguy.com> wrote in
> news:h5tuer7vesjr$.lm79y8bdn04g$.dlg@40tude.net: 
> 
>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:06:46 -0500, Dave Pyles wrote:
>> 
>>> richard wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:59:51 +1100, Jeff North wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:39:28 -0500, in comp.lang.php richard
>>>>> <member@newsguy.com>
>>>>> <e07f2j3vkz2c.1bw7d0qdedrkm$.dlg@40tude.net>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> | Looking for a fairly simple photo gallery with a few features.
>>>>>> | Menu on left with collapsing tree that allows only one branch
>>>>>> | open at a time.
>>>>>> | Thumbnails on right. with description.
>>>>>> | When clicked on the full size image will appear in a modal
>>>>>> | lightbox. 
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> | You would think this would be fairly easy to find somewhere.
>>>>>> | So far I haven't been able to locate what I want.
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> | If anyone knows of such a script available, please post a link
>>>>>> | to it. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Easy enough done.
>>>>> When page is accessed use php to gather the folder information and
>>>>> display in the left column (create hyperlinks for each folder name)
>>>>>
>>>>> When a user clicks on the folder name use AJAX to retrieve the
>>>>> folder contents and display the thumbnails on the main section of
>>>>> the page. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Each image will call the modal lightbox to display the full sized
>>>>> image.
>>>>
>>>> Precisely. Now where can I find the premade script to do that with?
>>> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=php+image+gallery+script
>>> Dave Pyles
>> 
>> let me shove it up your ass for you.
>> 
> Now *there* is an attitude that's bound to get you lots of help.

I am just so god damned sick and tired of this frickin attitude that
because a question was asked, some asshole comes around and replies with a
link to a search engine. Even more when it's "let me google that for you".
This tells me, that the poster believes you are so dumb and ignorant you
never heard of a search engine or know how they work.

I've spent a dozen or more hours searching for the answer. I ask here
because I figure maybe somebody just might have a website that has what I
want. But instead, I get my ass kicked around.

I'm also totally pissed off at the fact that google is more interested in
returning hits based upon ad linking. And thirty offshoots of what else
might even be remotely connected.

When I search for PHP what ever, out of the first 30 hits, 20 are
javascript stuff.  Apparently, google must think JS is the same thing as
PHP.

And apparently Dave Styles isn't man enough to kick my ass himself for my
reply.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4877

On 2/17/2012 9:00 PM, richard wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:11:26 +0000 (UTC), Doug Miller wrote:
>
>> richard<member@newsguy.com>  wrote in
>> news:h5tuer7vesjr$.lm79y8bdn04g$.dlg@40tude.net:
>>
>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:06:46 -0500, Dave Pyles wrote:
>>>
>>>> richard wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:59:51 +1100, Jeff North wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:39:28 -0500, in comp.lang.php richard
>>>>>> <member@newsguy.com>
>>>>>> <e07f2j3vkz2c.1bw7d0qdedrkm$.dlg@40tude.net>   wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> | Looking for a fairly simple photo gallery with a few features.
>>>>>>> | Menu on left with collapsing tree that allows only one branch
>>>>>>> | open at a time.
>>>>>>> | Thumbnails on right. with description.
>>>>>>> | When clicked on the full size image will appear in a modal
>>>>>>> | lightbox.
>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>> | You would think this would be fairly easy to find somewhere.
>>>>>>> | So far I haven't been able to locate what I want.
>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>> | If anyone knows of such a script available, please post a link
>>>>>>> | to it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Easy enough done.
>>>>>> When page is accessed use php to gather the folder information and
>>>>>> display in the left column (create hyperlinks for each folder name)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When a user clicks on the folder name use AJAX to retrieve the
>>>>>> folder contents and display the thumbnails on the main section of
>>>>>> the page.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Each image will call the modal lightbox to display the full sized
>>>>>> image.
>>>>>
>>>>> Precisely. Now where can I find the premade script to do that with?
>>>> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=php+image+gallery+script
>>>> Dave Pyles
>>>
>>> let me shove it up your ass for you.
>>>
>> Now *there* is an attitude that's bound to get you lots of help.
>
> I am just so god damned sick and tired of this frickin attitude that
> because a question was asked, some asshole comes around and replies with a
> link to a search engine. Even more when it's "let me google that for you".
> This tells me, that the poster believes you are so dumb and ignorant you
> never heard of a search engine or know how they work.
>

And many of us are sick and tired of YOUR attitude (and lack of 
understanding of even basic client-server programming concepts).

> I've spent a dozen or more hours searching for the answer. I ask here
> because I figure maybe somebody just might have a website that has what I
> want. But instead, I get my ass kicked around.
>

Well, what do you expect.  You never said anything about what you've 
looked for.  And considering your history here...

> I'm also totally pissed off at the fact that google is more interested in
> returning hits based upon ad linking. And thirty offshoots of what else
> might even be remotely connected.
>

No, not based on ad linking (except the sponsored links).  They're 
mostly based on content.

> When I search for PHP what ever, out of the first 30 hits, 20 are
> javascript stuff.  Apparently, google must think JS is the same thing as
> PHP.
>

Or maybe Google is trying to tell you something.  Like you're looking 
for the wrong thing (like others here have told you).

> And apparently Dave Styles isn't man enough to kick my ass himself for my
> reply.

I doubt he wants to get shit on his shoes.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4879

Jerry, I know full well and good the differences and reasons between
javascript and php. I've heard all of the damn arguments as to what should
be used and when.

Thing is, php is highly flexible where JS lacks.
Besides, I think the coding approach for PHP has been more thought out as
to what is done and when. JS is a poorly written code.

As I see it, the browser should do very little work. All it should have to
do is handle displaying the code. Not try and figure out a ton of other
stuff.

The higher grade applications, such as forums, are all mainly written in
PHP. Most all CMS applications are in PHP. 

yeah yeah I know what you're gonna say. But I figure, if it's available,
why not use it?

It's like the old argument, "Tables are evil; frames are evil".
But what else was there before CSS came along?  High end commercial sites
were all designed in tables. Then they went to CSS. Did it make the look
any different? Not really.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4880

On 2/17/2012 10:56 PM, richard wrote:
> Jerry, I know full well and good the differences and reasons between
> javascript and php. I've heard all of the damn arguments as to what should
> be used and when.
>
> Thing is, php is highly flexible where JS lacks.
> Besides, I think the coding approach for PHP has been more thought out as
> to what is done and when. JS is a poorly written code.
>
> As I see it, the browser should do very little work. All it should have to
> do is handle displaying the code. Not try and figure out a ton of other
> stuff.
>
> The higher grade applications, such as forums, are all mainly written in
> PHP. Most all CMS applications are in PHP.
>
> yeah yeah I know what you're gonna say. But I figure, if it's available,
> why not use it?
>
> It's like the old argument, "Tables are evil; frames are evil".
> But what else was there before CSS came along?  High end commercial sites
> were all designed in tables. Then they went to CSS. Did it make the look
> any different? Not really.

Richard, there's a HUGE difference between using tables or frames for 
layout, and opening transparent windows.  Once can be done on the 
server; the other cannot.

A really good reason NOT to use PHP to do it!

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4887

In article <kggao0nwx7es$.zeqj77kea12h$.dlg@40tude.net>,
 richard <member@newsguy.com> wrote:

> Jerry, I know full well and good the differences and reasons between
> javascript and php. I've heard all of the damn arguments as to what should
> be used and when.
> 
> Thing is, php is highly flexible where JS lacks.
> Besides, I think the coding approach for PHP has been more thought out as
> to what is done and when. JS is a poorly written code.
> 
> As I see it, the browser should do very little work. All it should have to
> do is handle displaying the code. Not try and figure out a ton of other
> stuff.

It may require JS - and perhaps a lot of it - in order to know what to 
display. Let's see - my email app has about 7700 lines of PHP and about 
15000 lines of JavsScript. This is not so surprising as it has to 
provide a complex interface to the user.

The browser can't do this by magic, much though you might like it to. 
And I really don't know what you mean by JS "lacking flexibility".

-- 
Tim

"That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed,
nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted"  --  Bill of Rights 1689

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4889

richard <member@newsguy.com> wrote in
news:kggao0nwx7es$.zeqj77kea12h$.dlg@40tude.net: 

> Jerry, I know full well and good the differences and reasons between
> javascript and php. I've heard all of the damn arguments as to what
> should be used and when.

You don't seem to understand that the issue is not what *should* be used, but what *can* (and cannot) 
be used. PHP runs on the server, not on the browser. If you want dynamic behavior to take place in the 
browser, you need to code that in the browser -- which means using JS and not PHP.

> Thing is, php is highly flexible where JS lacks.

That's simply not true. They're both highly flexible. But they're used for different purposes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4893

Am 2012-02-18 04:56, richard meinte:

> Jerry, I know full well and good the differences and reasons between
> javascript and php.

...and...

> Thing is, php is highly flexible where JS lacks. [...]
> JS is a poorly written code.

...proves that you are a completely clueless idiot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4894

Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> wrote in news:jhoske$du7$1@dont-email.me:

> Am 2012-02-18 04:56, richard meinte:
> 
>> Jerry, I know full well and good the differences and reasons between
>> javascript and php.
> 
> ...and...
> 
>> Thing is, php is highly flexible where JS lacks. [...]
>> JS is a poorly written code.
> 
> ...proves that you are a completely clueless idiot.
> 

When I first encountered richard in alt.html, people there were calling him RtS: Richard the Stoopid.
I used to think they were being uncharitable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4884

richard <member@newsguy.com> wrote in
news:z7mg4kkgnbne.1dgmguz4tyfqr$.dlg@40tude.net: 

> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:11:26 +0000 (UTC), Doug Miller wrote:
> 
>> richard <member@newsguy.com> wrote in
>> news:h5tuer7vesjr$.lm79y8bdn04g$.dlg@40tude.net: 
>> 
>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:06:46 -0500, Dave Pyles wrote:
>>> 
>>>> richard wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:59:51 +1100, Jeff North wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:39:28 -0500, in comp.lang.php richard
>>>>>> <member@newsguy.com>
>>>>>> <e07f2j3vkz2c.1bw7d0qdedrkm$.dlg@40tude.net>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> | Looking for a fairly simple photo gallery with a few features.
>>>>>>> | Menu on left with collapsing tree that allows only one branch
>>>>>>> | open at a time.
>>>>>>> | Thumbnails on right. with description.
>>>>>>> | When clicked on the full size image will appear in a modal
>>>>>>> | lightbox. 
>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>> | You would think this would be fairly easy to find somewhere.
>>>>>>> | So far I haven't been able to locate what I want.
>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>> | If anyone knows of such a script available, please post a link
>>>>>>> | to it. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Easy enough done.
>>>>>> When page is accessed use php to gather the folder information
>>>>>> and display in the left column (create hyperlinks for each folder
>>>>>> name) 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When a user clicks on the folder name use AJAX to retrieve the
>>>>>> folder contents and display the thumbnails on the main section of
>>>>>> the page. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Each image will call the modal lightbox to display the full sized
>>>>>> image.
>>>>>
>>>>> Precisely. Now where can I find the premade script to do that
>>>>> with? 
>>>> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=php+image+gallery+script
>>>> Dave Pyles
>>> 
>>> let me shove it up your ass for you.
>>> 
>> Now *there* is an attitude that's bound to get you lots of help.
> 
> I am just so god damned sick and tired of this frickin attitude that
> because a question was asked, some asshole comes around and replies
> with a link to a search engine. Even more when it's "let me google
> that for you". This tells me, that the poster believes you are so dumb
> and ignorant you never heard of a search engine or know how they work.

In your case, that appears to be a pretty good assumption.
> 
> I've spent a dozen or more hours searching for the answer. I ask here
> because I figure maybe somebody just might have a website that has
> what I want. But instead, I get my ass kicked around.

That's because you come here asking other people to do your work for you, instead of doing it 
yourself.
> 
> When I search for PHP what ever, out of the first 30 hits, 20 are
> javascript stuff.  Apparently, google must think JS is the same thing
> as PHP.

Apparently, you're not very good at using Google.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4885

Doug Miller wrote:
> richard <member@newsguy.com> wrote in

>> When I search for PHP what ever, out of the first 30 hits, 20 are
>> javascript stuff.  Apparently, google must think JS is the same thing
>> as PHP.
> 
> Apparently, you're not very good at using Google.

Or, more to the point he hasn't appreciated the difference between 
server side and client side processing.

"Like I want a car ,man but I don't want wheels and an engine, That's a 
simple request right? I cant understand why you guys are getting so 
abusive when I say I want it that way, you are just stoopid".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4878

richard wrote:

> let me shove it up your ass for you.

How to win friens and influence people, part I

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4886

On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:22:59 -0500, richard <member@newsguy.com>
wrote:

>let me shove it up your ass for you.

Congrats bullis, I think you've just guaranteed you'll never get help
in this group again.
-- 
To reply via e-mail, remove The Obvious and .invalid from my e-mail address.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4867

richard wrote:

> Precisely. Now where can I find the premade script to do that with?

<LOL!>

There'd be about fifty lines of code. Write your own; I did.

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4873

In article <ccklj6dqaqm2.1kp0p2iu69sar.dlg@40tude.net>,
 richard <member@newsguy.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:59:51 +1100, Jeff North wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:39:28 -0500, in comp.lang.php richard
> > <member@newsguy.com>
> > <e07f2j3vkz2c.1bw7d0qdedrkm$.dlg@40tude.net> wrote:
> > 
> >>| Looking for a fairly simple photo gallery with a few features.
> >>| Menu on left with collapsing tree that allows only one branch open at a
> >>| time.
> >>| Thumbnails on right. with description.
> >>| When clicked on the full size image will appear in a modal lightbox.
> >>| 
> >>| You would think this would be fairly easy to find somewhere.
> >>| So far I haven't been able to locate what I want.
> >>| 
> >>| If anyone knows of such a script available, please post a link to it.
> > 
> > Easy enough done.
> > When page is accessed use php to gather the folder information and
> > display in the left column (create hyperlinks for each folder name)
> > 
> > When a user clicks on the folder name use AJAX to retrieve the folder
> > contents and display the thumbnails on the main section of the page.
> > 
> > Each image will call the modal lightbox to display the full sized
> > image.
> 
> Precisely. Now where can I find the premade script to do that with?

My guess, when you hire someone to write it for you if you can't do it 
yourself.

We don't work for free, regardless of what you shove up my ass.

-- 
DeeDee, don't press that button!  DeeDee!  NO!  Dee...
[I filter all Goggle Groups posts, so any reply may be automatically ignored]

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.php

csiph-web