Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.php > #1968 > unrolled thread

Re: ImageMagick - Possible to return image as an object?

Started byBigNate <bignate52@gmail.com>
First post2011-06-01 13:22 -0700
Last post2011-06-02 18:01 +0200
Articles 5 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.php


Contents

  Re: ImageMagick - Possible to return image as an object? BigNate <bignate52@gmail.com> - 2011-06-01 13:22 -0700
    Re: ImageMagick - Possible to return image as an object? "Álvaro G. Vicario" <alvaro.NOSPAMTHANX@demogracia.com.invalid> - 2011-06-02 11:07 +0200
      Re: ImageMagick - Possible to return image as an object? Erwin Moller <Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spamyourself.com> - 2011-06-02 11:18 +0200
        Re: ImageMagick - Possible to return image as an object? "Álvaro G. Vicario" <alvaro.NOSPAMTHANX@demogracia.com.invalid> - 2011-06-02 16:18 +0200
          Re: ImageMagick - Possible to return image as an object? Luuk <Luuk@invalid.lan> - 2011-06-02 18:01 +0200

#1968 — Re: ImageMagick - Possible to return image as an object?

FromBigNate <bignate52@gmail.com>
Date2011-06-01 13:22 -0700
SubjectRe: ImageMagick - Possible to return image as an object?
Message-ID<a1a548ec-8c24-42fb-a840-ba46b3956f34@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com>
Update:

So I ended up rewriting what I had using the Imagick class and it came out just as good as using exec(), if not better.  Thanks for your suggestions!

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1970

From"Álvaro G. Vicario" <alvaro.NOSPAMTHANX@demogracia.com.invalid>
Date2011-06-02 11:07 +0200
Message-ID<is7jt7$8p4$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#1968
El 01/06/2011 22:22, BigNate escribió/wrote:
> Update:
>
> So I ended up rewriting what I had using the Imagick class and it
> came out just as good as using exec(), if not better.  Thanks for
> your suggestions!

Please try to post your replies as actual replies rather than new 
messages. Otherwise, it's hard to know what you are talking about.


-- 
-- http://alvaro.es - Álvaro G. Vicario - Burgos, Spain
-- Mi sitio sobre programación web: http://borrame.com
-- Mi web de humor satinado: http://www.demogracia.com
--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1971

FromErwin Moller <Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spamyourself.com>
Date2011-06-02 11:18 +0200
Message-ID<4de75539$0$49178$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
In reply to#1970
On 6/2/2011 11:07 AM, "Álvaro G. Vicario" wrote:
> El 01/06/2011 22:22, BigNate escribió/wrote:
>> Update:
>>
>> So I ended up rewriting what I had using the Imagick class and it
>> came out just as good as using exec(), if not better. Thanks for
>> your suggestions!
>
> Please try to post your replies as actual replies rather than new
> messages. Otherwise, it's hard to know what you are talking about.
>
>

Álvaro,

He is one of thoose GG users. In their view (gg) he IS posting in the 
right place because in gg it appears right.

Message-ID: 
<a1a548ec-8c24-42fb-a840-ba46b3956f34@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com>

I understand that the 'version2' of the new-improved-super-duper-user 
interface does that, as a service to all normal regular usenetizens. :-(

And yes, I consider it highly annoying too. You guessed. ;-)

Regards,
Erwin Moller

-- 
"That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without 
evidence."
-- Christopher Hitchens

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1972

From"Álvaro G. Vicario" <alvaro.NOSPAMTHANX@demogracia.com.invalid>
Date2011-06-02 16:18 +0200
Message-ID<is8631$pg6$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#1971
El 02/06/2011 11:18, Erwin Moller escribió/wrote:
> On 6/2/2011 11:07 AM, "Álvaro G. Vicario" wrote:
>> El 01/06/2011 22:22, BigNate escribió/wrote:
>>> Update:
>>>
>>> So I ended up rewriting what I had using the Imagick class and it
>>> came out just as good as using exec(), if not better. Thanks for
>>> your suggestions!
>>
>> Please try to post your replies as actual replies rather than new
>> messages. Otherwise, it's hard to know what you are talking about.
>>
>>
>
> Álvaro,
>
> He is one of thoose GG users. In their view (gg) he IS posting in the
> right place because in gg it appears right.
>
> Message-ID:
> <a1a548ec-8c24-42fb-a840-ba46b3956f34@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com>

I've just browsed the web site and you are right:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.php/JV7G_GMvQ2M

:-?


-- 
-- http://alvaro.es - Álvaro G. Vicario - Burgos, Spain
-- Mi sitio sobre programación web: http://borrame.com
-- Mi web de humor satinado: http://www.demogracia.com
--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1973

FromLuuk <Luuk@invalid.lan>
Date2011-06-02 18:01 +0200
Message-ID<4de7b3dd$0$49177$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
In reply to#1972
On 02-06-2011 16:18, "Álvaro G. Vicario" wrote:
> El 02/06/2011 11:18, Erwin Moller escribió/wrote:
>> On 6/2/2011 11:07 AM, "Álvaro G. Vicario" wrote:
>>> El 01/06/2011 22:22, BigNate escribió/wrote:
>>>> Update:
>>>>
>>>> So I ended up rewriting what I had using the Imagick class and it
>>>> came out just as good as using exec(), if not better. Thanks for
>>>> your suggestions!
>>>
>>> Please try to post your replies as actual replies rather than new
>>> messages. Otherwise, it's hard to know what you are talking about.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Álvaro,
>>
>> He is one of thoose GG users. In their view (gg) he IS posting in the
>> right place because in gg it appears right.
>>
>> Message-ID:
>> <a1a548ec-8c24-42fb-a840-ba46b3956f34@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com>
> 
> I've just browsed the web site and you are right:
> 
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.php/JV7G_GMvQ2M
> 
> :-?
> 
> 

or
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.php/browse_frm/thread/255ec6fc632f4363?hl=nl#
?

-- 
Luuk

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.php


csiph-web