Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.php > #9390 > unrolled thread

Re: Immediate Position:::Business Analyst With BI EXP::::At Houston, TX

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.php

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Immediate Position:::Business Analyst With BI EXP::::At Houston, TX Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-16 11:21 -0400
    Re: Immediate Position:::Business Analyst With BI EXP::::At Houston, TX "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> - 2013-05-16 10:57 -0500
      Re: Immediate Position:::Business Analyst With BI EXP::::At Houston, TX Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-16 12:24 -0400
    OT: answering spammers (was: Re: Immediate Position:::Business Analyst With BI EXP::::At Houston,   TX) Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-05-17 15:46 +0200
      Re: OT: answering spammers Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-17 11:03 -0400
        Re: OT: answering spammers Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-05-17 19:10 +0200
          Re: OT: answering spammers Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-05-17 19:45 -0400
            Re: OT: answering spammers Scott Johnson <noonehome@chalupasworld.com> - 2013-05-18 05:19 -0700
            Re: OT: answering spammers Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-05-20 08:43 +0200
    Re: Immediate Position:::Business Analyst With BI EXP::::At Houston, TX Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-05-17 07:05 -0700

#9390 — Re: Immediate Position:::Business Analyst With BI EXP::::At Houston, TX

On 5/16/2013 10:58 AM, susheel kumar wrote:
<spam>

I don't respond to spammers - especially ones who use a gmail address.

If you were a real recruiter, you would:

   Have a domain name
   Have a web site
   List jobs on that web site
   Use your own domain in your email address
   Not spam Usenet

The only conclusion that comes to mind is you are a scammer and very 
possibly an identity thief looking for a way to get private information.


-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#9391

"Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:kn2tae$u1k$1@dont-email.me... 

>I don't respond to spammers - especially ones who use a gmail address.

...he said, responding to the spammer's post.  LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#9392

On 5/16/2013 11:57 AM, Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle"  wrote in message news:kn2tae$u1k$1@dont-email.me...
>> I don't respond to spammers - especially ones who use a gmail address.
>
> ...he said, responding to the spammer's post.  LOL
>
>

And you don't see the difference.  It figures.  LOL.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#9403 — OT: answering spammers (was: Re: Immediate Position:::Business Analyst With BI EXP::::At Houston, TX)

Am 16.05.2013 17:21, schrieb Jerry Stuckle:

> On 5/16/2013 10:58 AM, susheel kumar wrote:
> <spam>
> 
> I don't respond to spammers - especially ones who use a gmail address.

Yes, you do. Or is this what you wrote here not a "respond"? How do you
describe this? "Just couldn't resist hacking my keyboard and by accident
a posting occured"? ;-)

> If you were a real recruiter, you would:
[...]

And if you were really concerned about the negative side effects of spam
in newsgroups, you would just ignore it. Do you really think, your
comments will change *anything*?

BTW: Without your reply I wouldn't even have noticed that a spammer
tried to post something to comp.lang.php - his posting was not delivered
to individual.de - maybe they have a working spam filter ;-)

F'up to poster, since this is already off topic here. Thanks for
respecting this.

-- 
Arno Welzel
http://arnowelzel.de
http://de-rec-fahrrad.de

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#9405 — Re: OT: answering spammers

On 5/17/2013 9:46 AM, Arno Welzel wrote:
> Am 16.05.2013 17:21, schrieb Jerry Stuckle:
>
>> On 5/16/2013 10:58 AM, susheel kumar wrote:
>> <spam>
>>
>> I don't respond to spammers - especially ones who use a gmail address.
>
> Yes, you do. Or is this what you wrote here not a "respond"? How do you
> describe this? "Just couldn't resist hacking my keyboard and by accident
> a posting occured"? ;-)
>

Calling them out is not responding to them.  But then trolls don't know 
the difference.

>> If you were a real recruiter, you would:
> [...]
>
> And if you were really concerned about the negative side effects of spam
> in newsgroups, you would just ignore it. Do you really think, your
> comments will change *anything*?
>
> BTW: Without your reply I wouldn't even have noticed that a spammer
> tried to post something to comp.lang.php - his posting was not delivered
> to individual.de - maybe they have a working spam filter ;-)
>
> F'up to poster, since this is already off topic here. Thanks for
> respecting this.
>

I really don't care if you saw the message or not.  But I do know that 
ignoring something does NOT make it go away.  But then neither spammers 
nor trolls like to be called out.

Why are you defending the spammers?

And fup changed back to the newsgroup.  I'm not ashamed of my answers 
and will not carry on a private conversation with a troll.


-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#9407 — Re: OT: answering spammers

           \|||/
           (o o)
   ,~~~ooO~~(_)~~~~~~~~~,
   | Please             |
   | don't feed the     |
   | TROLL!             |
   '~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ooO~~~'
          |__|__|
           || ||
          ooO Ooo

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#9410 — Re: OT: answering spammers

Almost, but one correction:

            \|||/
            (o o)
    ,~~~ooO~~(_)~~~~~~~~~,
    | Please             |
    | don't feed ARNO    |
    | THE TROLL!         |
    '~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ooO~~~'
           |__|__|
            || ||
           ooO Ooo

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#9413 — Re: OT: answering spammers

On 5/17/2013 4:45 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> Almost, but one correction:
>
>             \|||/
>             (o o)
>     ,~~~ooO~~(_)~~~~~~~~~,
>     | Please             |
>     | don't feed ARNO    |
>     | THE TROLL!         |
>     '~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ooO~~~'
>            |__|__|
>             || ||
>            ooO Ooo
>

Yall stop talking about feeding.  Your making me hungry.

Scotty

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#9474 — Re: OT: answering spammers

Jerry Stuckle, 2013-05-18 01:45:

> Almost, but one correction:
> 
>             \|||/
>             (o o)
>     ,~~~ooO~~(_)~~~~~~~~~,
>     | Please             |
>     | don't feed ARNO    |
>     | THE TROLL!         |
>     '~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ooO~~~'
>            |__|__|
>             || ||
>            ooO Ooo

qed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#9404

On Thu, 16 May 2013 11:21:29 -0400, Jerry Stuckle
<jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:

>On 5/16/2013 10:58 AM, susheel kumar wrote:
><spam>
>
>I don't respond to spammers - especially ones who use a gmail address.
>
>If you were a real recruiter, you would:
>
>   Have a domain name

The spammer does.

>   Have a web site

The spammer does.

>   List jobs on that web site

It does.

>   Use your own domain in your email address
>   Not spam Usenet

I agree with the rest.
-- 
To reply via e-mail, remove The Obvious and .invalid from my e-mail address.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.php

csiph-web