Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.php > #1486 > unrolled thread
| Started by | richard <member@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-05-10 09:57 -0700 |
| Last post | 2011-05-11 11:33 -0400 |
| Articles | 15 on this page of 55 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.php
mouse movement detection? richard <member@newsguy.com> - 2011-05-10 09:57 -0700
Re: mouse movement detection? Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2011-05-10 21:11 +0200
Re: mouse movement detection? richard <member@newsguy.com> - 2011-05-10 12:23 -0700
Re: mouse movement detection? "P E Schoen" <paul@pstech-inc.com> - 2011-05-10 15:42 -0400
Re: mouse movement detection? richard <member@newsguy.com> - 2011-05-10 13:56 -0700
Re: mouse movement detection? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2011-05-10 21:15 +0000
Re: mouse movement detection? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2011-05-10 19:40 +0000
Re: mouse movement detection? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2011-05-10 15:10 -0500
Re: mouse movement detection? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-05-10 23:52 +0200
Re: mouse movement detection? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-10 20:03 -0400
Re: mouse movement detection? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-05-11 10:49 +0200
Re: mouse movement detection? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-11 06:39 -0400
Re: mouse movement detection? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-05-11 14:24 +0200
Re: mouse movement detection? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-11 11:25 -0400
Re: mouse movement detection? Sherm Pendley <sherm.pendley@gmail.com> - 2011-05-11 11:36 -0400
Re: mouse movement detection? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-11 12:30 -0400
Re: mouse movement detection? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2011-05-10 20:24 -0500
Re: mouse movement detection? Erwin Moller <Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spamyourself.com> - 2011-05-11 08:16 +0200
Re: mouse movement detection? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-05-11 11:02 +0200
Re: mouse movement detection? Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2011-05-11 13:18 +1000
Re: mouse movement detection? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2011-05-11 04:00 +0000
Re: mouse movement detection? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-05-11 11:11 +0200
Re: mouse movement detection? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2011-05-11 16:57 +0000
Re: mouse movement detection? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-05-11 22:42 +0200
Re: mouse movement detection? Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2011-05-11 23:34 +1000
Re: mouse movement detection? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2011-05-11 16:53 +0000
Re: mouse movement detection? Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2011-05-12 12:26 +1000
Re: mouse movement detection? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2011-05-12 04:35 +0000
Re: mouse movement detection? Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2011-05-12 16:09 +1000
Re: mouse movement detection? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-12 06:52 -0400
Re: mouse movement detection? Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2011-05-13 06:48 +1000
Re: mouse movement detection? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2011-05-12 16:12 +0000
Re: mouse movement detection? Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2011-05-13 07:36 +1000
Re: mouse movement detection? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2011-05-12 22:05 +0000
Re: mouse movement detection? Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2011-05-13 10:14 +1000
Re: mouse movement detection? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2011-05-13 00:56 +0000
Re: mouse movement detection? Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2011-05-13 20:34 +1000
Re: mouse movement detection? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2011-05-13 15:36 +0000
Re: mouse movement detection? Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2011-05-14 10:01 +1000
Re: mouse movement detection? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2011-05-14 03:51 +0000
Re: mouse movement detection? Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2011-05-14 15:00 +1000
Re: mouse movement detection? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2011-05-14 06:00 +0000
Re: mouse movement detection? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-05-15 13:35 +0200
Re: mouse movement detection? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2011-05-15 16:41 +0000
Re: mouse movement detection? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-15 13:00 -0400
Re: mouse movement detection? "Twayne" <nobody@devnull.spamcop.net> - 2011-05-17 11:37 -0400
Re: mouse movement detection? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-17 12:34 -0400
Re: mouse movement detection? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-05-16 00:36 +0200
Re: mouse movement detection? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2011-05-16 02:07 +0000
Re: mouse movement detection? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-05-17 22:33 +0200
Re: mouse movement detection? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2011-05-17 20:52 +0000
Re: mouse movement detection? "P E Schoen" <paul@pstech-inc.com> - 2011-05-18 08:10 -0400
Re: mouse movement detection? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2011-05-18 15:20 +0000
Re: mouse movement detection? dougatmilmacdotcom@example.com (Doug Miller) - 2011-05-16 12:00 +0000
Re: mouse movement detection? Sherm Pendley <sherm.pendley@gmail.com> - 2011-05-11 11:33 -0400
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-14 15:00 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <at2ss6he8uvr6vmnd43oceb4pvgagt9j38@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1585 |
On Sat, 14 May 2011 03:51:31 -0000, in comp.lang.php jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com <3ra1a8-955.ln1@mail.specsol.com> wrote: >| Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> wrote: >| > On Fri, 13 May 2011 15:36:55 -0000, in comp.lang.php >| > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >| > <npvv98-m7s.ln1@mail.specsol.com> wrote: >| >| <snip steaming piles of crap> >| >| >| >>| Perhaps you should learn to read as the very first sentence asks the quite >| >>| clear multipart question "... if PHP, or other script language ..." which >| >>| makes the post about the capability of PHP. >| > >| > Are you saying the PHP can be used to detect mouse movement on a web >| > page? >| >| No, you babbling twit, I'm saying the question of whether or not PHP can >| detect mouse movement is a valid question for a PHP group. I'm glad that you agree that this thread is completely off-topic in comp.lang.php newsgroup.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-14 06:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mci1a8-u66.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #1586 |
Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > On Sat, 14 May 2011 03:51:31 -0000, in comp.lang.php > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > <3ra1a8-955.ln1@mail.specsol.com> wrote: > >>| Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> wrote: >>| > On Fri, 13 May 2011 15:36:55 -0000, in comp.lang.php >>| > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>| > <npvv98-m7s.ln1@mail.specsol.com> wrote: >>| >>| <snip steaming piles of crap> >>| >>| >>| >>| Perhaps you should learn to read as the very first sentence asks the quite >>| >>| clear multipart question "... if PHP, or other script language ..." which >>| >>| makes the post about the capability of PHP. >>| > >>| > Are you saying the PHP can be used to detect mouse movement on a web >>| > page? >>| >>| No, you babbling twit, I'm saying the question of whether or not PHP can >>| detect mouse movement is a valid question for a PHP group. > > I'm glad that you agree that this thread is completely off-topic in > comp.lang.php newsgroup. Moron. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-15 13:35 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1578595.YKUYFuaPT4@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #1559 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> wrote: >>>| which means javascript. >> >> To be semantically correct - there is also the non-standard VBScript >> or the much lesser known language TCL >> (http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-script-970314 circa 1998). > > If I add "for all practical purposes" between the words "means" and > "javascript" would that make you happy? No, for there is no "javascript". <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> > I originally was going to do that but left it out thinking no one could > be that anal retentive. In my experience, it has always been sloppy thinkers (and sloppy programmers) to accuse others of being "anal retentive" when they are asking for accuracy (a term that is based on Freud's long-disproved psychological theory, yet still lives on among the general population). Often the same individuals that cannot help to use scatological references when describing or addressing their opponents or situations. IOW: It figures. PointedEars -- Anyone who slaps a 'this page is best viewed with Browser X' label on a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web, when you had very little chance of reading a document written on another computer, another word processor, or another network. -- Tim Berners-Lee
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-15 16:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <4bc5a8-tim.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #1592 |
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> wrote: >>>>| which means javascript. >>> >>> To be semantically correct - there is also the non-standard VBScript >>> or the much lesser known language TCL >>> (http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-script-970314 circa 1998). >> >> If I add "for all practical purposes" between the words "means" and >> "javascript" would that make you happy? > > No, for there is no "javascript". > > <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> Yes, there is a "javascript"; it is a registered trademark of the Oracle Corportation. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-15 13:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <iqp0sb$6ag$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1593 |
On 5/15/2011 12:41 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn<PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>> Jeff North<jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> wrote: >>>>> | which means javascript. >>>> >>>> To be semantically correct - there is also the non-standard VBScript >>>> or the much lesser known language TCL >>>> (http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-script-970314 circa 1998). >>> >>> If I add "for all practical purposes" between the words "means" and >>> "javascript" would that make you happy? >> >> No, for there is no "javascript". >> >> <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> > > Yes, there is a "javascript"; it is a registered trademark of the Oracle > Corportation. > > Don't mind "Pointed Head". He has a well-known reputation for trolling in multiple newsgroups. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle JDS Computer Training Corp. jstucklex@attglobal.net ==================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Twayne" <nobody@devnull.spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-17 11:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <iqu4n4$9l2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1594 |
In news:iqp0sb$6ag$1@dont-email.me, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> typed: > On 5/15/2011 12:41 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn<PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>> Jeff North<jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>> which means javascript. >>>>> >>>>> To be semantically correct - there is also the >>>>> non-standard VBScript or the much lesser known >>>>> language TCL (http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-script-970314 >>>>> circa 1998). >>>> >>>> If I add "for all practical purposes" between the >>>> words "means" and "javascript" would that make you >>>> happy? >>> >>> No, for there is no "javascript". >>> >>> <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> >> >> Yes, there is a "javascript"; it is a registered >> trademark of the Oracle Corportation. >> >> > > Don't mind "Pointed Head". He has a well-known > reputation for trolling in multiple newsgroups. Just as you have a reputation for giving only partial answers to people just to keep your own ego above water. Woof!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-17 12:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <iqu83h$u4p$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1640 |
On 5/17/2011 11:37 AM, Twayne wrote: > In news:iqp0sb$6ag$1@dont-email.me, > Jerry Stuckle<jstucklex@attglobal.net> typed: >> On 5/15/2011 12:41 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn<PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> Jeff North<jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>>> which means javascript. >>>>>> >>>>>> To be semantically correct - there is also the >>>>>> non-standard VBScript or the much lesser known >>>>>> language TCL (http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-script-970314 >>>>>> circa 1998). >>>>> >>>>> If I add "for all practical purposes" between the >>>>> words "means" and "javascript" would that make you >>>>> happy? >>>> >>>> No, for there is no "javascript". >>>> >>>> <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> >>> >>> Yes, there is a "javascript"; it is a registered >>> trademark of the Oracle Corportation. >>> >>> >> >> Don't mind "Pointed Head". He has a well-known >> reputation for trolling in multiple newsgroups. > > Just as you have a reputation for giving only partial answers to people just > to keep your own ego above water. Woof! > > ROFLMAO! You just cant stand to know that you have a reputation for trolling, while I have one for giving appropriate assistance, can you! -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle JDS Computer Training Corp. jstucklex@attglobal.net ==================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-16 00:36 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1874532.hYOnFovDVI@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #1593 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> wrote: >>>>>| which means javascript. >>>> To be semantically correct - there is also the non-standard VBScript >>>> or the much lesser known language TCL >>>> (http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-script-970314 circa 1998). >>> If I add "for all practical purposes" between the words "means" and >>> "javascript" would that make you happy? >> No, for there is no "javascript". >> >> <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> > > Yes, there is a "javascript"; it is a registered trademark of the Oracle > Corportation. >> In my experience, it has always been sloppy thinkers (and sloppy >> programmers) to accuse others of being "anal retentive" when they are >> asking for accuracy (a term that is based on Freud's long-disproved >> psychological theory, yet still lives on among the general >> population). Often the same individuals that cannot help to use >> scatological references when describing or addressing their opponents >> or situations. QED PointedEars -- Danny Goodman's books are out of date and teach practices that are positively harmful for cross-browser scripting. -- Richard Cornford, cljs, <cife6q$253$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk> (2004)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-16 02:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sfd6a8-267.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #1595 |
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>| which means javascript. >>>>> To be semantically correct - there is also the non-standard VBScript >>>>> or the much lesser known language TCL >>>>> (http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-script-970314 circa 1998). >>>> If I add "for all practical purposes" between the words "means" and >>>> "javascript" would that make you happy? >>> No, for there is no "javascript". >>> >>> <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> >> >> Yes, there is a "javascript"; it is a registered trademark of the Oracle >> Corportation. > >>> In my experience, it has always been sloppy thinkers (and sloppy >>> programmers) to accuse others of being "anal retentive" when they are >>> asking for accuracy (a term that is based on Freud's long-disproved >>> psychological theory, yet still lives on among the general >>> population). Often the same individuals that cannot help to use >>> scatological references when describing or addressing their opponents >>> or situations. > > QED > > > PointedEars Yet another child that doesn't understand how things work in the grown up world. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-17 22:33 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <2636387.LZWGnKmheA@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #1604 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>| which means javascript.
>>>>>> To be semantically correct - there is also the non-standard VBScript
>>>>>> or the much lesser known language TCL
>>>>>> (http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-script-970314 circa 1998).
>>>>> If I add "for all practical purposes" between the words "means" and
>>>>> "javascript" would that make you happy?
>>>> No, for there is no "javascript".
>>>>
>>>> <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
>>>
>>> Yes, there is a "javascript"; it is a registered trademark of the Oracle
>>> Corportation.
>>
>>>> In my experience, it has always been sloppy thinkers (and sloppy
>>>> programmers) to accuse others of being "anal retentive" when they are
>>>> asking for accuracy (a term that is based on Freud's long-disproved
>>>> psychological theory, yet still lives on among the general
>>>> population). Often the same individuals that cannot help to use
>>>> scatological references when describing or addressing their opponents
>>>> or situations.
>>
>> QED
>
> Yet another child that doesn't understand how things work in the grown
> up world.
Oracle _Corporation_ now owns the _JavaScript_ trademark because Sun
Microsystems, Inc., is now their wholly owned subsidiary. Sun previously
owned the trademark in order to settle a dispute between Netscape
Corporation, whose Brendan Eich invented the JavaScript programming language
(formerly LiveScript, renamed only for marketing purposes), and Sun who
already owned the "Java" trademark. That is also why Microsoft named their
JavaScript clone JScript shortly after.
However, in the grown-up world where you do not live in, it does not matter
who owns the _JavaScript_ trademark for the fact that there is no
_javascript_ _language_, and that there are different and differing
implementations of an extensible language standard, ECMAScript, along with
different and different implementations of DOM interfaces, instead. Had you
followed my research, you would have at least known that.
Since you have not answered my question about your use of the registered
sux.com domain, and there is no mailbox with that address, I have to assume
that you do not have permission to use it (whereas network abuse is rather
typical for aioe.org users), and that pseudo-sub-level domain of yours has
been added to my killfile.
PointedEars
--
realism: HTML 4.01 Strict
evangelism: XHTML 1.0 Strict
madness: XHTML 1.1 as application/xhtml+xml
-- Bjoern Hoehrmann
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-17 20:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lo3ba8-3bs.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #1647 |
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>>>| which means javascript. >>>>>>> To be semantically correct - there is also the non-standard VBScript >>>>>>> or the much lesser known language TCL >>>>>>> (http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-script-970314 circa 1998). >>>>>> If I add "for all practical purposes" between the words "means" and >>>>>> "javascript" would that make you happy? >>>>> No, for there is no "javascript". >>>>> >>>>> <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> >>>> >>>> Yes, there is a "javascript"; it is a registered trademark of the Oracle >>>> Corportation. >>> >>>>> In my experience, it has always been sloppy thinkers (and sloppy >>>>> programmers) to accuse others of being "anal retentive" when they are >>>>> asking for accuracy (a term that is based on Freud's long-disproved >>>>> psychological theory, yet still lives on among the general >>>>> population). Often the same individuals that cannot help to use >>>>> scatological references when describing or addressing their opponents >>>>> or situations. >>> >>> QED >> >> Yet another child that doesn't understand how things work in the grown >> up world. > > Oracle _Corporation_ now owns the _JavaScript_ trademark because Sun > Microsystems, Inc., is now their wholly owned subsidiary. Sun previously > owned the trademark... Yep, and the fact that it is a tradmark means that it exists by definition. <snip arm waving babble> -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "P E Schoen" <paul@pstech-inc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-18 08:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ir0cvt$31v$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1648 |
jimp wrote in message news:lo3ba8-3bs.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > Yep, and the fact that it is a tradmark means that it exists by > definition. I don't know if you are just being sarcastic or if you do not realize that there is a difference in what is trademarked and generally accepted as the correct name JavaScript, and the same sequence of letters with other variations of case. Most of this thread has deteriorated into something other than what is useful and productive. I don't even know why I waste my time reading such posts. Paul
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-18 15:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <om4da8-gsl.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #1653 |
P E Schoen <paul@pstech-inc.com> wrote: > jimp wrote in message news:lo3ba8-3bs.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > >> Yep, and the fact that it is a tradmark means that it exists by >> definition. > > I don't know if you are just being sarcastic or if you do not realize that > there is a difference in what is trademarked and generally accepted as the > correct name JavaScript, and the same sequence of letters with other > variations of case. Most of this thread has deteriorated into something > other than what is useful and productive. I don't even know why I waste my > time reading such posts. > > Paul Yeah, me too. BTW, minor, or even semi-major, changes to a trademark are still fodder for law suits, as in Nissan Motors against Nissan Comuter, named after founder and president Uzi Nissan and started when Nissan Motors called it's product Datsun. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dougatmilmacdotcom@example.com (Doug Miller) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-16 12:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <iqr3k9$ja2$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1592 |
In article <1578595.YKUYFuaPT4@PointedEars.de>, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <php@PointedEars.de> wrote: > >In my experience, it has always been sloppy thinkers (and sloppy >programmers) to accuse others of being "anal retentive" when they are asking >for accuracy (a term that is based on Freud's long-disproved psychological >theory, yet still lives on among the general population). Often the same >individuals that cannot help to use scatological references when describing >or addressing their opponents or situations. You mean like when people tell you that you're full of s**t? Here's a news flash for you, PointedHead: that's *not* a sign of sloppy thinking.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sherm Pendley <sherm.pendley@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-11 11:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8739kluu9h.fsf@sherm.shermpendley.com> |
| In reply to | #1486 |
richard <member@newsguy.com> writes: > Just curious to know if PHP, or other script language, has a method of > detecting mouse movement. JavaScript might, but PHP runs on the server. sherm--
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.php
csiph-web