Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.php > #5585 > unrolled thread

Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.php

Contents

  Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Torsten Jørgensen <info@stconinc.com> - 2012-04-20 10:32 +0200
    Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-04-20 07:22 -0400
      Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Torsten Jørgensen <info@stconinc.com> - 2012-04-21 15:11 +0200
        Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-04-21 10:22 -0400
        Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-04-21 14:42 +0000
          Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Torsten Jørgensen <info@stconinc.com> - 2012-04-21 19:16 +0200
          Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Torsten Jørgensen <info@stconinc.com> - 2012-04-21 19:43 +0200
            Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-04-24 08:54 +0000
              Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Torsten Jorgensen <info@stconinc.com> - 2012-04-28 01:46 +0200
    Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-04-21 19:22 +0200
      Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Torsten Jørgensen <info@stconinc.com> - 2012-04-21 19:42 +0200
        Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-04-22 10:24 +0200
          Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Torsten Jørgensen <info@stconinc.com> - 2012-04-22 10:53 +0200
            Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-04-22 09:25 -0400
              Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-04-23 11:04 +0200
                Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-04-23 08:47 -0400
              Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Torsten Jørgensen <info@stconinc.com> - 2012-04-24 00:06 +0200
                Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2012-04-23 17:43 -0500
                  Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Scott Johnson <noonehome@chalupasworld.com> - 2012-04-24 05:53 -0700
    Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2012-04-22 19:04 +0200
      Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Torsten Jørgensen <info@stconinc.com> - 2012-04-24 00:04 +0200
        Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2012-04-24 10:24 +0200
          Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Torsten Jorgensen <info@stconinc.com> - 2012-04-28 01:50 +0200
            Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-04-27 21:58 -0400
              Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Torsten Jorgensen <info@stconinc.com> - 2012-04-29 17:53 +0200
                Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-04-29 13:15 -0400
    Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Torsten Jorgensen <info@stconinc.com> - 2012-04-28 01:54 +0200
      Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-04-27 22:03 -0400
      Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-04-28 10:36 +0200
      Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Graham Hobbs <ghobbs@cdpwise.net> - 2012-04-28 10:01 -0400
        Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-04-28 16:41 +0100
          Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-04-28 20:17 +0200
        Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-04-28 14:33 -0400
          Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-04-28 22:32 +0100
            Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-04-28 22:56 +0100
              Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-04-28 19:36 -0400
            Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-04-28 19:36 -0400
            Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-04-28 20:24 -0400
              Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-04-29 13:09 +0100
                Re: Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-04-29 11:14 -0400

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#5585 — Do you want to develop PHP for the Web and make money

Well, making money may be a hard talk. It depends on wheather the 
supported software
in your oppinion lives up to the standards given in industry.

I am making business software using web technology with PHP. Why web, 
yeah why not.
It is difficult to argue anyway exept that it is fickle, gross and not 
conforming to
standards. It sure as hell does not have the professional looking sheen that
corporate software has.

Does it work. Yeah, it does - if you will agree with me on the function 
given in the
programs. It is not Java, it is HTML and HTML-forms in combination with 
PHP documents
that gives the programs their functionality.

I have a website, where some of the modules are on display, and others 
are optioned
for download. It is freeware so you can freely download and examine any 
piece of
code. You might ask, what is so funky about something being freeware 
when you want
to make money on it. Well, you can ask for a charge if given 
corporation is willing
and able to pay, and even set a standard fee. That is not against the 
law. However
each pay in turn - everybody should e able to aquire a webtool.

That is what they are called: Sterling WebTools(tm). And if you sell 
any one of them
you are entitled to 10% of the revenue. The price is 100.000 Dkr 
Standard per Unit.
What Standard and Unit means will be explained on some later occation, not now.

I do not want beady little misers. There is enough angry webhackers out 
there already
we do not need to add to the calamity. Business is AD in notion and in 
manner, and a
positive outlook and perspective on the world is basic.

I have not sold a thing yet, not here in my hand though, and not money 
in the account
yet. But the future is blue. You might say that I have pretty little to 
show for if
I have not yet sold a single copy. Point is, if I had I would not be 
needing you.

Also you should look at the programs and make up your own opinion.

Ok, so sales are 10%, but I want to hack what then...

Here is the deal:

	Sales				10%
	Merchantiles		 5%
	Devastation		 2%
	Insulence			 1%
	Data				 0.5%
	It					 0.25%

	Programming		40%
	Sortie				50%
	Danska				60%
	Norm				70%
	Djengis Khan		80%
	Seller				90%


How this works out may not be immediately apparant, but they are exact 
terms, so it
can be settled in a court. There is a way.

Sterling WebTools(tm) can be found at the following website: www.stweto.biz

-- 
Sterling Consulting Incorporated
Torsten Jorgensen

Hedevangen 16, Rebild
9520 Skorping
Denmark

info@stconinc.com
www.stconinc.com

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#5591

On 4/20/2012 4:32 AM, Torsten Jørgensen wrote:

<Snip spam>

I don't deal with spammers, or anyone who talks about court action right 
off the bat.

And just because they are "exact terms" doesn't mean they are legal!

Take your snake oil somewhere else!
-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5630

On 2012-04-20 11:22:14 +0000, Jerry Stuckle said:

> On 4/20/2012 4:32 AM, Torsten Jørgensen wrote:
> 
> <Snip spam>
> 
> I don't deal with spammers, or anyone who talks about court action 
> right off the bat.
> 
> And just because they are "exact terms" doesn't mean they are legal!
> 
> Take your snake oil somewhere else!

I do not intend to be a Snake, I do not think you will come very far in 
business
with inequal intensions. What has to be the deal, is something that is to an
advantage of all of us.

What the court action means, is that it can be *settled* in a court of law, and
that is then considered to be a term that is to be to advantage to all 
the parties
included.

There is no fake intended.

-- 
This time machine is really funky...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5632

On 4/21/2012 9:11 AM, Torsten Jørgensen wrote:
> On 2012-04-20 11:22:14 +0000, Jerry Stuckle said:
>
>> On 4/20/2012 4:32 AM, Torsten Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>> <Snip spam>
>>
>> I don't deal with spammers, or anyone who talks about court action
>> right off the bat.
>>
>> And just because they are "exact terms" doesn't mean they are legal!
>>
>> Take your snake oil somewhere else!
>
> I do not intend to be a Snake, I do not think you will come very far in
> business
> with inequal intensions. What has to be the deal, is something that is
> to an
> advantage of all of us.
>
> What the court action means, is that it can be *settled* in a court of
> law, and
> that is then considered to be a term that is to be to advantage to all
> the parties
> included.
>
> There is no fake intended.
>

Take your snake oil somewhere else.  Anything can be settled in a court 
of law.  The fact you even have to say that means you have snake oil.

And it's also SPAM, BTW.

BTW, I've had a very successful consulting business for 20+ years.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5633

On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:11:22 +0200, Torsten Jørgensen wrote:

> What the court action means, is that it can be *settled* in a court of
> law, and that is then considered to be a term that is to be to advantage
> to all the parties included.

Sorry, but I see Jerry's point on this one.

You don't open a sales pitch by saying "so it can be settled in a court".

Such an opening implies one of the following:

a) That you intend to be dishonest with me, and expect to take me to 
court.
b) That you intend to be dishonest with me, and expect me to take you to 
court.
c) That you expect me to be dishonest with you, and expect to take me to 
court.
d) That you expect me to be dishonest with you, and expect me to take you 
to court.

Now given that I consider myself to be honest and have at the outset (1) 
no intention of being dishonest with you and (2) no expectation of taking 
you to court, then the only option that remains viable is (a) - you 
intend to be dishonest with me, and expect to take me to court - and thus 
I now assume that your terms are a bunch of legalese designed solely to 
screw over anyone who enters into any sort of deal with you. Having 
reached that conclusion, my wish to enter into any sort of business 
arrangement with you equates pretty much with my desire to jump naked and 
bleeding into a tank full of hungry piranhas.

I'm not saying this is the case, I'm saying it's the impression that your 
sales pitch has given me.

Rgds

Denis McMahon

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5636

On 2012-04-21 14:42:52 +0000, Denis McMahon said:

> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:11:22 +0200, Torsten Jørgensen wrote:
> 
>> What the court action means, is that it can be *settled* in a court of
>> law, and that is then considered to be a term that is to be to advantage
>> to all the parties included.
> 
> Sorry, but I see Jerry's point on this one.
> 
> You don't open a sales pitch by saying "so it can be settled in a court".
> 
> Such an opening implies one of the following:
> 
> a) That you intend to be dishonest with me, and expect to take me to
> court.
> b) That you intend to be dishonest with me, and expect me to take you to
> court.
> c) That you expect me to be dishonest with you, and expect to take me to
> court.
> d) That you expect me to be dishonest with you, and expect me to take you
> to court.
> 
> Now given that I consider myself to be honest and have at the outset (1)
> no intention of being dishonest with you and (2) no expectation of taking
> you to court, then the only option that remains viable is (a) - you
> intend to be dishonest with me, and expect to take me to court - and thus
> I now assume that your terms are a bunch of legalese designed solely to
> screw over anyone who enters into any sort of deal with you. Having
> reached that conclusion, my wish to enter into any sort of business
> arrangement with you equates pretty much with my desire to jump naked and
> bleeding into a tank full of hungry piranhas.
> 
> I'm not saying this is the case, I'm saying it's the impression that your
> sales pitch has given me.
> 
> Rgds
> 
> Denis McMahon

Does anyone understand what I am talking about.
-- 
Sterling Consulting Incorporated
Torsten Jorgensen

Hedevangen 16, Rebild
9520 Skorping
Denmark

info@stconinc.com
www.stconinc.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5640

On 2012-04-21 14:42:52 +0000, Denis McMahon said:

> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:11:22 +0200, Torsten Jørgensen wrote:
> 
>> What the court action means, is that it can be *settled* in a court of
>> law, and that is then considered to be a term that is to be to advantage
>> to all the parties included.
> 
> Sorry, but I see Jerry's point on this one.
> 
> You don't open a sales pitch by saying "so it can be settled in a court".
> 
> Such an opening implies one of the following:
> 
> a) That you intend to be dishonest with me, and expect to take me to
> court.
> b) That you intend to be dishonest with me, and expect me to take you to
> court.
> c) That you expect me to be dishonest with you, and expect to take me to
> court.
> d) That you expect me to be dishonest with you, and expect me to take you
> to court.
> 
> Now given that I consider myself to be honest and have at the outset (1)
> no intention of being dishonest with you and (2) no expectation of taking
> you to court, then the only option that remains viable is (a) - you
> intend to be dishonest with me, and expect to take me to court - and thus
> I now assume that your terms are a bunch of legalese designed solely to
> screw over anyone who enters into any sort of deal with you. Having
> reached that conclusion, my wish to enter into any sort of business
> arrangement with you equates pretty much with my desire to jump naked and
> bleeding into a tank full of hungry piranhas.
> 
> I'm not saying this is the case, I'm saying it's the impression that your
> sales pitch has given me.
> 
> Rgds
> 
> Denis McMahon

Because I say that something can be settled in a court of law, I am a bad guy?
-- 
Sterling Consulting Incorporated
Torsten Jorgensen

Hedevangen 16, Rebild
9520 Skorping
Denmark

info@stconinc.com
www.stconinc.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5696

On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 19:43:35 +0200, Torsten Jørgensen wrote:

> Because I say that something can be settled in a court of law, I am a
> bad guy?

You suggest it will need to be settled in court.

That means one of us must be a bad guy.

I don't think I'm a bad guy.

That makes you the bad guy.

Unless you're calling me a bad guy. If you're calling me a bad guy, I 
have no interest at all in doing business with you!

Rgds

Denis McMahon

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5768

On 2012-04-24 08:54:25 +0000, Denis McMahon said:

> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 19:43:35 +0200, Torsten Jørgensen wrote:
> 
>> Because I say that something can be settled in a court of law, I am a
>> bad guy?
> 
> You suggest it will need to be settled in court.

No one is saying 'need'.

It is nice to know that differences can be settled, should any occur.
You are seeing demons everywhere and expecting everyone to be a bad guy.
Also a contract in business need to be legal, one way to mke sure that
it clears a court scrutiny is to make it strict, that way there is no
misunderstandings. You do not want to stand with differences and then
have an unclear definition in the contract.

I do not suggest anything.

> That means one of us must be a bad guy.

Inane.

> 
> I don't think I'm a bad guy.

Moron

> That makes you the bad guy.

Accusal.

> Unless you're calling me a bad guy. If you're calling me a bad guy, I
> have no interest at all in doing business with you.

Harrass.

> Rgds
> 
> Denis McMahon

What you are writing is inditement, take it easy.
-- 
Get your widget out of my way.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5638

Torsten Jørgensen wrote on 2012-04-20:

> […]

You're a little late for an April Fool's joke.

-- 
PointedEars

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5639

On 2012-04-21 17:22:49 +0000, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said:

> Torsten Jørgensen wrote on 2012-04-20:
> 
>> […]
> 
> You're a little late for an April Fool's joke.

Libel.
-- 
Sterling Consulting Incorporated
Torsten Jorgensen

Hedevangen 16, Rebild
9520 Skorping
Denmark

info@stconinc.com
www.stconinc.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5647

Torsten Jørgensen wrote:

> On 2012-04-21 17:22:49 +0000, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said:
>> Torsten Jørgensen wrote on 2012-04-20:
>>> […]
>> 
>> You're a little late for an April Fool's joke.
> 
> Libel.

Sue me.


PointedEars
-- 
Use any version of Microsoft Frontpage to create your site.
(This won't prevent people from viewing your source, but no one
will want to steal it.)
  -- from <http://www.vortex-webdesign.com/help/hidesource.htm> (404-comp.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5648

On 2012-04-22 08:24:03 +0000, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said:

> Torsten Jørgensen wrote:
> 
>> On 2012-04-21 17:22:49 +0000, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said:
>>> Torsten Jørgensen wrote on 2012-04-20:
>>>> […]
>>> 
>>> You're a little late for an April Fool's joke.
>> 
>> Libel.
> 
> Sue me.

Cool, I might blow you instead if you want me to. But do you not agree 
that the tone
here on USENET can get a bit shall we call it 'vitriolic', from time to 
time, or am
I just being hypersensitive.
-- 
This time machine is really funky...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5652

On 4/22/2012 4:53 AM, Torsten Jørgensen wrote:
> On 2012-04-22 08:24:03 +0000, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said:
>
>> Torsten Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>>> On 2012-04-21 17:22:49 +0000, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said:
>>>> Torsten Jørgensen wrote on 2012-04-20:
>>>>> […]
>>>>
>>>> You're a little late for an April Fool's joke.
>>>
>>> Libel.
>>
>> Sue me.
>
> Cool, I might blow you instead if you want me to. But do you not agree
> that the tone
> here on USENET can get a bit shall we call it 'vitriolic', from time to
> time, or am
> I just being hypersensitive.

You're just being an arsehole.  When you start out with a post 
threatening possible court action, you get what you ask for.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5668

Am 22.04.2012 15:25, schrieb Jerry Stuckle:
> On 4/22/2012 4:53 AM, Torsten Jørgensen wrote:
>> On 2012-04-22 08:24:03 +0000, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said:
>>
>>> Torsten Jørgensen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2012-04-21 17:22:49 +0000, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said:
>>>>> Torsten Jørgensen wrote on 2012-04-20:
>>>>>> […]
>>>>>
>>>>> You're a little late for an April Fool's joke.
>>>>
>>>> Libel.
>>>
>>> Sue me.
>>
>> Cool, I might blow you instead if you want me to. But do you not agree
>> that the tone
>> here on USENET can get a bit shall we call it 'vitriolic', from time to
>> time, or am
>> I just being hypersensitive.
> 
> You're just being an arsehole.  When you start out with a post threatening possible
> court action, you get what you ask for.
> 

For me, people who start insulting others first, without reason, qualify for "asshole".

/Str.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5669

On 4/23/2012 5:04 AM, M. Strobel wrote:
> Am 22.04.2012 15:25, schrieb Jerry Stuckle:
>> On 4/22/2012 4:53 AM, Torsten Jørgensen wrote:
>>> On 2012-04-22 08:24:03 +0000, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said:
>>>
>>>> Torsten Jørgensen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2012-04-21 17:22:49 +0000, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said:
>>>>>> Torsten Jørgensen wrote on 2012-04-20:
>>>>>>> […]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're a little late for an April Fool's joke.
>>>>>
>>>>> Libel.
>>>>
>>>> Sue me.
>>>
>>> Cool, I might blow you instead if you want me to. But do you not agree
>>> that the tone
>>> here on USENET can get a bit shall we call it 'vitriolic', from time to
>>> time, or am
>>> I just being hypersensitive.
>>
>> You're just being an arsehole.  When you start out with a post threatening possible
>> court action, you get what you ask for.
>>
>
> For me, people who start insulting others first, without reason, qualify for "asshole".
>
> /Str.
>

Yes, I understand how a troll would feel that way.


-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5692

On 2012-04-22 13:25:11 +0000, Jerry Stuckle said:

> On 4/22/2012 4:53 AM, Torsten Jørgensen wrote:
>> On 2012-04-22 08:24:03 +0000, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said:
>> 
>>> Torsten Jørgensen wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 2012-04-21 17:22:49 +0000, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said:
>>>>> Torsten Jørgensen wrote on 2012-04-20:
>>>>>> […]
>>>>> 
>>>>> You're a little late for an April Fool's joke.
>>>> 
>>>> Libel.
>>> 
>>> Sue me.
>> 
>> Cool, I might blow you instead if you want me to. But do you not agree
>> that the tone
>> here on USENET can get a bit shall we call it 'vitriolic', from time to
>> time, or am
>> I just being hypersensitive.
> 
> You're just being an arsehole.  When you start out with a post 
> threatening possible court action, you get what you ask for.

Now libel, court at action.
-- 
This time machine is really funky...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5693

On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:06:43 +0200, Torsten J??rgensen wrote:
> On 2012-04-22 13:25:11 +0000, Jerry Stuckle said:
>
>> On 4/22/2012 4:53 AM, Torsten J??rgensen wrote:
>>> On 2012-04-22 08:24:03 +0000, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said:
>>> 
>>>> Torsten J????rgensen wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 2012-04-21 17:22:49 +0000, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said:
>>>>>> Torsten J????rgensen wrote on 2012-04-20:
>>>>>>> [???????]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You're a little late for an April Fool's joke.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Libel.
>>>> 
>>>> Sue me.
>>> 
>>> Cool, I might blow you instead if you want me to. But do you not agree
>>> that the tone
>>> here on USENET can get a bit shall we call it 'vitriolic', from time to
>>> time, or am
>>> I just being hypersensitive.
>> 
>> You're just being an arsehole.  When you start out with a post 
>> threatening possible court action, you get what you ask for.
>
> Now libel, court at action.

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it
means. 

-- 
For why should my freedom be judged by another's conscience?  
			    -- Paul (I Corinthians 10:29)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5698

On 4/23/2012 3:43 PM, Peter H. Coffin wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:06:43 +0200, Torsten J??rgensen wrote:
>> On 2012-04-22 13:25:11 +0000, Jerry Stuckle said:
>>
>>> On 4/22/2012 4:53 AM, Torsten J??rgensen wrote:
>>>> On 2012-04-22 08:24:03 +0000, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said:
>>>>
>>>>> Torsten J????rgensen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2012-04-21 17:22:49 +0000, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said:
>>>>>>> Torsten J????rgensen wrote on 2012-04-20:
>>>>>>>> [???????]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're a little late for an April Fool's joke.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Libel.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sue me.
>>>>
>>>> Cool, I might blow you instead if you want me to. But do you not agree
>>>> that the tone
>>>> here on USENET can get a bit shall we call it 'vitriolic', from time to
>>>> time, or am
>>>> I just being hypersensitive.
>>>
>>> You're just being an arsehole.  When you start out with a post
>>> threatening possible court action, you get what you ask for.
>>
>> Now libel, court at action.
>
> You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it
> means.
>

Inigo Montoya?  Is that you? :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5658

On 20-04-2012 10:32, Torsten Jørgensen wrote:
> Well, making money may be a hard talk. It depends on wheather the
> supported software
> in your oppinion lives up to the standards given in industry.
> 
> I am making business software using web technology with PHP. Why web,
> yeah why not.

You should try to make better software,
before trying to sell it...

> 
> How this works out may not be immediately apparant, but they are exact
> terms, so it
> can be settled in a court. There is a way.

http://www.stweto.biz/demo/account/library/account.dat

If my business-data could be aquired that easily....
I would start a business right now... ;)
(or i would sue my software vendor)

> 
> Sterling WebTools(tm) can be found at the following website: www.stweto.biz
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.php

csiph-web