Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.php > #16438 > unrolled thread
| Started by | James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-17 09:37 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-03-22 05:23 -0700 |
| Articles | 6 on this page of 86 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.php
PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 09:37 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-02-17 11:05 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 15:04 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-02-17 10:54 -0500
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 01:09 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-02-17 21:12 -0500
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 19:07 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-20 21:07 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 20:35 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-20 21:40 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 21:02 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe gordonb.lkcah@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2016-02-29 21:29 -0600
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-17 23:33 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 01:12 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-18 21:48 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-02-18 08:05 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2016-02-18 09:59 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 10:29 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2016-02-18 11:36 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-02-18 15:44 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-18 21:47 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-02-18 08:02 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 19:29 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-20 21:37 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 21:37 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-21 15:02 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 15:02 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-02-17 08:19 -0500
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-02-17 14:43 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-02-17 15:04 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-02-17 15:17 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-02-17 15:47 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-02-17 15:57 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-02-17 10:57 -0500
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-02-17 17:10 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-02-17 12:11 -0500
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-02-17 18:51 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-02-17 12:55 -0500
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-02-17 19:06 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-02-17 20:19 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-02-18 08:18 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-02-18 09:20 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-02-18 15:48 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-02-18 16:25 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-02-18 17:00 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-18 22:26 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-02-18 10:48 -0500
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-02-17 16:38 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-02-17 10:56 -0500
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-02-17 19:08 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-17 23:35 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-02-17 09:56 -0500
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-02-17 16:44 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-02-17 12:12 -0500
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-02-17 19:04 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-02-17 09:55 -0500
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-02-17 16:39 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-02-17 11:00 -0500
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 15:15 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-02-17 11:05 -0500
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 01:18 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-02-17 19:14 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 00:19 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-17 23:36 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-17 23:26 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 00:36 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-18 22:03 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 19:38 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-20 21:17 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 20:56 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-20 23:48 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 09:37 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-21 14:42 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 15:03 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-02-21 14:09 -0500
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 19:34 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-02-21 14:49 -0500
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 19:56 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-02-21 20:29 -0500
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 07:30 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-02-22 08:13 -0500
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 15:01 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-02-22 10:31 -0500
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-22 00:10 +0100
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 23:45 +0000
Re: PHP processing steps to apply to a URL to make it safe pittendrigh <Sandy.Pittendrigh@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 05:23 -0700
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
| From | Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 08:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <naf1cf$e8a$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #16586 |
On 2/22/2016 2:30 AM, James Harris wrote: > On 22/02/2016 01:29, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >> On 2/21/2016 2:56 PM, James Harris wrote: >>> On 21/02/2016 19:49, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >>>> On 2/21/2016 2:34 PM, James Harris wrote: >>>>> On 21/02/2016 19:09, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> >>>>>> One of the rare times I agree with Pointed Head. This is a stupid >>>>>> idea. >>>>> >>>>> OK, I'll bite. Why? >>> >>>> For all the reasons others and I have mentioned previously. Read back >>>> through the thread. >>> >>> I read every post. I wouldn't ask a question and then not read the >>> replies. > >> Obviously you didn't, > > Yes, I did. > >> or you didn't understand. > > Well, it seems that someone didn't understand. > >> There have been many >> objections to what you're trying to do by several people. > > As a matter of courtesy I have tried to respond to all the questions I > was asked during the discussion as it went ahead. I don't remember > anyone having remaining issues with my responses. I don't see what more > a person can do to respond to your objections. > > James > You're hopeless. I'm not going to waste any more time trying to help you. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle jstucklex@attglobal.net ==================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 15:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <naf7no$7e8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #16587 |
On 22/02/2016 13:13, Jerry Stuckle wrote: > On 2/22/2016 2:30 AM, James Harris wrote: >> On 22/02/2016 01:29, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >>> On 2/21/2016 2:56 PM, James Harris wrote: >>>> On 21/02/2016 19:49, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >>>>> On 2/21/2016 2:34 PM, James Harris wrote: >>>>>> On 21/02/2016 19:09, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>>>>> One of the rare times I agree with Pointed Head. This is a stupid >>>>>>> idea. >>>>>> >>>>>> OK, I'll bite. Why? >>>> >>>>> For all the reasons others and I have mentioned previously. Read back >>>>> through the thread. >>>> >>>> I read every post. I wouldn't ask a question and then not read the >>>> replies. >> >>> Obviously you didn't, >> >> Yes, I did. >> >>> or you didn't understand. >> >> Well, it seems that someone didn't understand. >> >>> There have been many >>> objections to what you're trying to do by several people. >> >> As a matter of courtesy I have tried to respond to all the questions I >> was asked during the discussion as it went ahead. I don't remember >> anyone having remaining issues with my responses. I don't see what more >> a person can do to respond to your objections. >> >> James >> > > You're hopeless. I'm not going to waste any more time trying to help you. You're arrogant. A lot of your comments are not helpful but are about your opinions. I'm not going to waste any more time replying to your efforts to keep this thread going. Not my style but that seems to be how you like to communicate. James
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 10:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <naf9e1$du0$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #16588 |
On 2/22/2016 10:01 AM, James Harris wrote: > On 22/02/2016 13:13, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >> On 2/22/2016 2:30 AM, James Harris wrote: >>> On 22/02/2016 01:29, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >>>> On 2/21/2016 2:56 PM, James Harris wrote: >>>>> On 21/02/2016 19:49, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >>>>>> On 2/21/2016 2:34 PM, James Harris wrote: >>>>>>> On 21/02/2016 19:09, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>>>>> One of the rare times I agree with Pointed Head. This is a stupid >>>>>>>> idea. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OK, I'll bite. Why? >>>>> >>>>>> For all the reasons others and I have mentioned previously. Read >>>>>> back >>>>>> through the thread. >>>>> >>>>> I read every post. I wouldn't ask a question and then not read the >>>>> replies. >>> >>>> Obviously you didn't, >>> >>> Yes, I did. >>> >>>> or you didn't understand. >>> >>> Well, it seems that someone didn't understand. >>> >>>> There have been many >>>> objections to what you're trying to do by several people. >>> >>> As a matter of courtesy I have tried to respond to all the questions I >>> was asked during the discussion as it went ahead. I don't remember >>> anyone having remaining issues with my responses. I don't see what more >>> a person can do to respond to your objections. >>> >>> James >>> >> >> You're hopeless. I'm not going to waste any more time trying to help >> you. > > You're arrogant. A lot of your comments are not helpful but are about > your opinions. I'm not going to waste any more time replying to your > efforts to keep this thread going. > > Not my style but that seems to be how you like to communicate. > > James > No, you just don't take advice from those who know more than you. And I'm including virtually everyone who has replied to you in this thread. You have taken none of their advice. No, I'm not arrogant. I just know it's a waste of time to try to teach a pig to sing. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle jstucklex@attglobal.net ==================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 00:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1852851.Fa4viQKSry@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #16580 |
James Harris wrote: > On 21/02/2016 19:09, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >> On 2/21/2016 10:03 AM, James Harris wrote: >>> On 21/02/2016 13:42, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>>> James Harris wrote: >>>>> On 20/02/2016 22:48, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>>>>> Because you would not rewrite *every* request to the same PHP >>>>>> program, would you? >>>>> Pretty much, yes. All of this is about processing such URLs in PHP >>>>> code. >>>> That is a stupid idea. >>> No, it's the right idea for my application. >> […] This is a stupid idea. > > OK, I'll bite. Why? You want to run PHP on top of Web server software (Apache) and have PHP do what Web server software is supposed to do instead. -- PointedEars Zend Certified PHP Engineer <http://www.zend.com/en/yellow-pages/ZEND024953> | Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-21 23:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nadi2j$cf5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #16583 |
On 21/02/2016 23:10, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > James Harris wrote: > >> On 21/02/2016 19:09, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >>> On 2/21/2016 10:03 AM, James Harris wrote: >>>> On 21/02/2016 13:42, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>>>> James Harris wrote: >>>>>> On 20/02/2016 22:48, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>>>>>> Because you would not rewrite *every* request to the same PHP >>>>>>> program, would you? >>>>>> Pretty much, yes. All of this is about processing such URLs in PHP >>>>>> code. >>>>> That is a stupid idea. >>>> No, it's the right idea for my application. >>> […] This is a stupid idea. >> >> OK, I'll bite. Why? > > You want to run PHP on top of Web server software (Apache) and have PHP do > what Web server software is supposed to do instead. Before I explain the details is this an objection to do with performance? If Apache and PHP could both carry out some or all of the work why exactly would you choose Apache over PHP? To explain why PHP is needed (and I think this was one of the points we discussed), yes, the requests get directed to a PHP script but then the PHP script transforms the URL in ways that Apache cannot. Specifically, given the URL http://example.com/B/C/D: * B is the partition. The PHP script uses the partition name as a folder and looks in that folder for a configuration file. Each partition will be able to have a separate configuration. * The configuration file tells the script how to transform the rest of the URL. * The PHP script transforms the C/D part of the URL into a set of keys and uses those to locate a resource. If nothing else, Apache cannot do this as the configuration file format will not be meaningful to Apache. -- James
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pittendrigh <Sandy.Pittendrigh@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 05:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <53af0f8a-2d00-4e7a-bcc1-0409df2e055a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #16438 |
Haven't logged in for a decade. Not surprised to find it's deja vu all over again.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.php
csiph-web