Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.php > #2670
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.php |
| Subject | Re: The prefered way to handle mobile apps? |
| Date | Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:21:52 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 16 |
| Message-ID | <slrnj32vkg.icc.hellsop@nibelheim.ninehells.com> (permalink) |
| References | <99cin5FioiU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnj32m39.icc.hellsop@nibelheim.ninehells.com> <4ho2371oq3nc1f1ktj6lvdk1tn90d0q4um@mfesser.de> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="le/2G4+BNpieVhQI6uJ2Lw"; logging-data="8320"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/cL8wyslu1QJnNdzx1d/wi" |
| User-Agent | slrn/0.9.9p1 (OpenBSD) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:pbbwKIgGhESKHXrGi49JBMw3DrI= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.php:2670 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:23:29 +0200, Michael Fesser wrote:
> A reason why browser sniffing is ugly, inefficient and unreliable.
>
> Unfortunately in many cases it's most likely still the only way,
> because many browser still don't support the better alternatives, like
> handheld CSS and the new media queries in CSS 3.
There is always the option of composing a page to render well on any
sanely sized screen, and there's development tools to aid in this, but
that's well outside the scope of PHP.
--
This was, apparently, beyond her ken. So far beyond her ken that she
was well into barbie territory.
-- J. D. Baldwin
Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The prefered way to handle mobile apps? Simon <bad@example.com> - 2011-07-28 09:51 +0200
Re: The prefered way to handle mobile apps? "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2011-07-28 07:39 -0500
Re: The prefered way to handle mobile apps? Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2011-07-28 15:23 +0200
Re: The prefered way to handle mobile apps? "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2011-07-28 10:21 -0500
Re: The prefered way to handle mobile apps? legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2011-07-28 21:31 +0000
Re: The prefered way to handle mobile apps? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-07-28 19:53 -0400
Re: The prefered way to handle mobile apps? Simon <bad@example.com> - 2011-07-29 08:33 +0200
Re: The prefered way to handle mobile apps? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-07-29 08:03 -0400
Re: The prefered way to handle mobile apps? "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2011-07-29 08:46 -0500
Re: The prefered way to handle mobile apps? Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2011-07-28 18:37 -0400
csiph-web