Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.php > #13804

Re: testing email deliverability...

From The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc, comp.lang.php
Subject Re: testing email deliverability...
Date 2014-06-06 16:46 +0100
Organization albasani.net
Message-ID <lmsnp3$4en$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <cone.1401937492.701278.23384.1000@monster.email-scan.com> <lmos6f$bg8$1@news.albasani.net> <lmrd1q$s6u$1@dont-email.me> <lmsgdb$ba4$1@dont-email.me> <lmsjn8$8pf$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 06/06/14 15:37, Denis McMahon wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 09:41:05 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>
>> On 6/5/2014 11:36 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
>>> I feel I'm about to step into a giant pile of doo, but .... Some years
>>> back I used a Windows program from Analogx called listmaster pro to
>>> verify email addresses manually
>
>> And how did it know?
>
>> For instance - I have three domains.  You can send and email to any
>> address at any of the three.  But unless it's a valid address, the email
>> ends up in /dev/null.
>
> Which brings us back round to:
>
> The only way to guarantee that an email address is actually going to the
> entity that entered it on your form is to send a verification code to the
> email address.
>
> And even then, I suspect that there are some smart spamming systems out
> there that have email addresses and use eg curl to process the email
> verification links (which is why I use entity and not person above).
>
I juts love all this 'guarantee' when getting spam don from 99 to 1 
would be a satisfactory result.

I don't care if I get false negatives ads long as the 99 true negatives 
get rejected.


-- 
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – a system of government where the least capable to 
lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the 
members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are 
rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a 
diminishing number of producers.

Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

testing email deliverability... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2014-06-05 01:48 +0100
  Re: testing email deliverability... Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-04 18:40 -0700
  Re: testing email deliverability... "Tony Marston" <TonyMarston@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-05 03:47 +0100
    Re: testing email deliverability... Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2014-06-05 04:53 +0000
      Re: testing email deliverability... Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-06-05 09:13 +0100
        Re: testing email deliverability... Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-05 08:05 -0700
      Re: testing email deliverability... Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2014-06-09 11:30 +0200
        Re: testing email deliverability... Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2014-06-09 23:08 +0000
          Re: testing email deliverability... Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2014-06-10 11:08 +0200
  Re: testing email deliverability... Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2014-06-04 22:04 -0500
    Re: testing email deliverability... Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-06-04 23:27 -0400
    Re: testing email deliverability... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2014-06-05 05:37 +0100
      Re: testing email deliverability... Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-04 21:55 -0700
      Re: testing email deliverability... Chuck Anderson <cycletourist@invalid.invalid> - 2014-06-05 21:36 -0600
        Re: testing email deliverability... Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-06-06 09:41 -0400
          Re: testing email deliverability... Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2014-06-06 14:37 +0000
            Re: testing email deliverability... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2014-06-06 16:46 +0100
              Re: testing email deliverability... Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-06 10:39 -0700
  Re: testing email deliverability... Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-06-04 23:05 -0400
  Re: testing email deliverability... "AvdB" <nomail@example.invalid> - 2014-06-05 12:59 +0200
    Re: testing email deliverability... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2014-06-05 13:51 +0100
  Re: testing email deliverability... Adrienne Boswell <arbpen@yahoo.com> - 2014-06-05 18:39 +0000
    Re: testing email deliverability... Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2014-06-05 20:46 +0000
      Re: testing email deliverability... Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-05 14:41 -0700
      Re: testing email deliverability... Adrienne Boswell <arbpen@yahoo.com> - 2014-06-05 22:21 +0000
  Re: testing email deliverability... James Moe <jimoeDESPAM@sohnen-moe.com> - 2014-06-05 13:14 -0700
  Re: testing email deliverability... Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2014-06-06 14:11 +0200
  Re: testing email deliverability... Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2014-06-09 13:53 +0100

csiph-web