Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.php > #13804
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, comp.lang.php |
| Subject | Re: testing email deliverability... |
| Date | 2014-06-06 16:46 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <lmsnp3$4en$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <cone.1401937492.701278.23384.1000@monster.email-scan.com> <lmos6f$bg8$1@news.albasani.net> <lmrd1q$s6u$1@dont-email.me> <lmsgdb$ba4$1@dont-email.me> <lmsjn8$8pf$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 06/06/14 15:37, Denis McMahon wrote: > On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 09:41:05 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote: > >> On 6/5/2014 11:36 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > >>> I feel I'm about to step into a giant pile of doo, but .... Some years >>> back I used a Windows program from Analogx called listmaster pro to >>> verify email addresses manually > >> And how did it know? > >> For instance - I have three domains. You can send and email to any >> address at any of the three. But unless it's a valid address, the email >> ends up in /dev/null. > > Which brings us back round to: > > The only way to guarantee that an email address is actually going to the > entity that entered it on your form is to send a verification code to the > email address. > > And even then, I suspect that there are some smart spamming systems out > there that have email addresses and use eg curl to process the email > verification links (which is why I use entity and not person above). > I juts love all this 'guarantee' when getting spam don from 99 to 1 would be a satisfactory result. I don't care if I get false negatives ads long as the 99 true negatives get rejected. -- Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.
Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
testing email deliverability... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2014-06-05 01:48 +0100
Re: testing email deliverability... Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-04 18:40 -0700
Re: testing email deliverability... "Tony Marston" <TonyMarston@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-05 03:47 +0100
Re: testing email deliverability... Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2014-06-05 04:53 +0000
Re: testing email deliverability... Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-06-05 09:13 +0100
Re: testing email deliverability... Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-05 08:05 -0700
Re: testing email deliverability... Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2014-06-09 11:30 +0200
Re: testing email deliverability... Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2014-06-09 23:08 +0000
Re: testing email deliverability... Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2014-06-10 11:08 +0200
Re: testing email deliverability... Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2014-06-04 22:04 -0500
Re: testing email deliverability... Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-06-04 23:27 -0400
Re: testing email deliverability... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2014-06-05 05:37 +0100
Re: testing email deliverability... Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-04 21:55 -0700
Re: testing email deliverability... Chuck Anderson <cycletourist@invalid.invalid> - 2014-06-05 21:36 -0600
Re: testing email deliverability... Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-06-06 09:41 -0400
Re: testing email deliverability... Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2014-06-06 14:37 +0000
Re: testing email deliverability... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2014-06-06 16:46 +0100
Re: testing email deliverability... Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-06 10:39 -0700
Re: testing email deliverability... Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-06-04 23:05 -0400
Re: testing email deliverability... "AvdB" <nomail@example.invalid> - 2014-06-05 12:59 +0200
Re: testing email deliverability... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2014-06-05 13:51 +0100
Re: testing email deliverability... Adrienne Boswell <arbpen@yahoo.com> - 2014-06-05 18:39 +0000
Re: testing email deliverability... Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2014-06-05 20:46 +0000
Re: testing email deliverability... Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-05 14:41 -0700
Re: testing email deliverability... Adrienne Boswell <arbpen@yahoo.com> - 2014-06-05 22:21 +0000
Re: testing email deliverability... James Moe <jimoeDESPAM@sohnen-moe.com> - 2014-06-05 13:14 -0700
Re: testing email deliverability... Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2014-06-06 14:11 +0200
Re: testing email deliverability... Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2014-06-09 13:53 +0100
csiph-web