Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.php > #10994
| From | Curtis Dyer <dyer85@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.php |
| Subject | Re: alternative to fwrite? |
| Date | 2013-10-04 00:06 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <l2l0pm$489$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <l2hqdl$o6v$1@speranza.aioe.org> <l2i06b$d77$1@dont-email.me> <l2ic26$4v7$1@speranza.aioe.org> <slrnl4pf1f.kov.hellsop@nibelheim.ninehells.com> <l2kaqs$4ko$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Twayne wrote: > On 2013-10-02 8:37 PM, Peter H. Coffin wrote: >> On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:00:01 -0400, Twayne wrote: >>> On 2013-10-02 4:37 PM, Scott Johnson wrote: >>>> On 10/2/2013 11:58 AM, Twayne wrote: >>>>> On 2013-10-02 10:01 AM, Evan Platt wrote: > ... >>> OK or some, dangerous for others as bots regularly probe & >>> scan newsgroups, mining for e-mails to scrape up. >> >> Unless it got MORE popular than two years ago, that is not the >> case. Email addresses posted on websites, even as "userpart at >> example.com" started receiving spam in less than a week. Email >> addresses posted to newsgroups alone took an average of five >> weeks to start receiving spam, and confined to addresses >> posting to very popular alt.* groups. Big 8-only didn't get >> picked up at all until we shut down the experiment after three >> months. > > TWO years? Please check up on some current events in this area; > a LOT has changed, especially in the last two years. But not > scraping addresses; it's still very common. > One positive thing that has happened, is ISPs have become > much better at protecting their clients inboxes. Mine does a > stellar job. But the scraping continues unabated. I've found the best approach, for now, is getting better filtering. Google seems to do a nice job. I don't bother with munging my email anymore, yet I almost never get spam in my inbox. <snip> -- Curtis Dyer <?$x='<?$x=%c%s%c;printf($x,39,$x,39);?>';printf($x,39,$x,39);?>
Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
alternative to fwrite? Mr Oldies <noreply@example.com> - 2013-10-01 10:27 -0400
Re: alternative to fwrite? Salvatore <sal@yojimbo.hack.invalid> - 2013-10-01 15:22 +0000
Re: alternative to fwrite? Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-10-01 17:58 +0200
Re: alternative to fwrite? "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-10-01 17:03 +0000
Re: alternative to fwrite? richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-10-01 15:25 -0400
Re: alternative to fwrite? "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-10-02 00:39 +0000
Re: alternative to fwrite? Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-10-02 07:52 -0400
Re: alternative to fwrite? Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-10-02 12:46 -0700
Re: alternative to fwrite? richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-10-03 22:31 -0400
Re: alternative to fwrite? Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-10-02 07:01 -0700
Re: alternative to fwrite? Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> - 2013-10-02 14:58 -0400
Re: alternative to fwrite? Scott Johnson <noonehome@chalupasworld.com> - 2013-10-02 13:37 -0700
Re: alternative to fwrite? Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> - 2013-10-02 20:00 -0400
Re: alternative to fwrite? "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2013-10-02 19:37 -0500
Re: alternative to fwrite? Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> - 2013-10-03 13:51 -0400
Re: alternative to fwrite? Curtis Dyer <dyer85@gmail.com> - 2013-10-04 00:06 +0000
Re: alternative to fwrite? richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-10-03 22:19 -0400
Re: alternative to fwrite? Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-10-19 22:28 -0700
Re: alternative to fwrite? Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-10-19 22:27 -0700
csiph-web