Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.php > #6034

Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP

From Shake <QUITAESTO@QUITAESTO.NOES>
Newsgroups comp.lang.php
Subject Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP
Date 2012-05-14 16:22 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <jor4ea$81f$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (25 earlier) <slrnjr0ur0.4ci.hellsop@nibelheim.ninehells.com> <joqdhs$a2t$1@dont-email.me> <joqscr$nr7$1@dont-email.me> <joqtjq$ute$1@dont-email.me> <jor1qg$nnm$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

El 14/05/2012 15:37, Jerry Stuckle escribió:
> Get a rteal load and you're in trouble. You'll be taking CPU time
> resizing images - EVERYONE will have to wait, not just one user. Get
> busy enough and you'll bring the server to its knees.

¿?¿? You read/understood something of what I wrote?


[Balancer]

[httpd] [httpd]                 [EC2]

[Mysql*] [Sphinx*]

[] independent systems.
* And other services

EC2 Machine does the scaling. Both balanced httpd are ready to process 
new incoming petitions. One of them have a process waiting answer from 
ec2 and only this one take more time to finish. the "HARD WORK" is done 
by auto-scalable EC2 machines.



>> Ec2 could "grow" when necesary getting more CPU to "battle" the overload
>> without troubles. And cheapest than buying big machines to process
>> millions ob images offline, and then put online wasting a lot of
>> traffic...
>
> Or you can resize offline and not waste the server's resources. But that
> would take a bit of skill, I do understand.

¿?¿? What you say is the easy way. But ineffective. And waste resources, 
A LOT OF THEM. because implies having a few machines for a few days only 
doing this work! And also implies a few days without having this work 
available online!

The images have to be resizes yes or yes. You thought that "the server" 
is only a http server. For me the server "do services". An the important 
services for the company where I get a lot of experience about big 
amount of image reescaling is having the images available for the user 
today, just 2 seconds after the click, and not two weeks in the future, 
just one second after the click.

If you think that doing resize on server is risky. Yes, it is. You have 
to dimensionate correctly your hardware, and do a good logic. But it can 
be done, it's done everyday by a lot of companies. I worked in one of 
them. I saw. And I could empirecally (exists this word?) test the way 
you explain and the way I explain. And the result in the real world, is 
that the little overhead of this last is insignificant compared with the 
benefits.


>
>>> But even with that, you should be resizing offline and not requiring the
>>> server to do it.
>>
>> Not always possible, My way, first user, 2 second delay (in worst cases,
>> reescaling 4x3 images). Your way, all users three weeks of waiting.
>>
>
> It is always possible.

Is not if images sizes changes before you finished reescaling.

>
> First of all, you shouldn't be waiting until the website is complete
> before knowing what images you need to resize.

This say nothing.


> Second, you really have no idea how long it takes you to resize YOUR
> images. You don't have 7.5M images - that was Daniel. And you have no
> idea what equipment he has.

I don't know how long take Daniel's images. I know how long takes mine. 
I exposed mi case: 1million images. And post by post I have been 
detailing some data about the structure used to host.

>
> Third, if it does take 3 weeks to resize, then that's 3 weeks worth of
> load you're requiring the server to perform. That's what you don't get -
> the resizing takes time.

You are mixing apples and oranges. It take 3 weeks to resize de images 
in computers that are not thinked to do. And buy a "good computer" only 
to scale off-line images is more expensive than using a good dimensioned 
server.

>> In real traffic, new images are scaled dilued inside normal traffic in
>> an unnoticeable wat. After putting on a new size.. next weeks or average
>> time per pages have no noticeable changes.
>>
> In REAL traffic your server won't have time to serve the web pages - it
> will be too busy resizing images. But your traffic is so light you don't
> see it.

But it is now working. On real world. And with traffic. Perhaps I do 
magic... and I am a wizard or you're wrong.

>
>>>
>>> But it sounds like you're too cheap to get your developers decent
>>> machines,
>>
>> Me? I am a developer. Not the boss. And as a developer I don't need
>> powerfull machines able to reescale milions of images :)
>>
>
> No, but the graphics people should. And good companies give their
> developers good machines. And good companies know what shouldn't be done
> on servers.

The graphics people? what are you talking about? we are talking about 
rescaling images, not about its artistical content.

And also we are not talking about good or bad companies. And I you think 
you have skills to judge about companies from a fragmented view you take 
from a few words on Usenet... Perhaps you are also a wizard like me...

>
> That was your statement. And I suspect that's what you really do -
> except this time you got caught at it. Nice try at back-pedaling.

I said what I said. And there is a lot of things I don't said. But you 
decided how I do what I don't said.

If explaining about this is for you "back-pedaling" what are you trying 
to say? That I am lying or something like that?

And... Why? :) have no sense.

> Gee, that's an awful lot of unnecessary work for the server. But I guess
> as long as you get so little traffic you can afford to do so.

I wrote the traffic. 8 millions page views per month. And. Is work the 
server have to do! Because we serve images!!! And we serv today, not 
next week.

Greetings

Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Dominique Ottello <air.intakes@fra.fr.invalid> - 2012-05-06 11:12 +0200
  Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2012-05-06 11:51 +0200
    Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Dominique Ottello <air.intakes@fra.fr.invalid> - 2012-05-06 17:23 +0200
      Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-05-06 18:11 +0200
        Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Dominique Ottello <air.intakes@fra.fr.invalid> - 2012-05-06 19:04 +0200
          Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-05-07 20:05 +0200
            Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-05-07 20:23 +0100
              Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-07 17:16 -0400
              Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2012-05-07 16:49 -0500
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-07 15:01 -0700
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-07 20:15 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-07 20:37 -0700
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-05-08 09:11 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-08 08:21 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-08 11:17 -0700
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-09 09:14 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-05-09 17:05 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-09 12:21 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-05-09 19:36 +0100
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-05-09 21:31 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-05-12 11:12 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-05-12 22:56 +0100
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2012-05-14 10:51 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-05-14 10:17 +0100
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-05-14 19:26 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2012-05-10 00:23 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-09 23:52 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2012-05-10 08:50 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-10 08:01 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2012-05-10 21:01 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-10 15:12 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2012-05-11 11:56 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-11 06:50 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-05-11 13:57 +0100
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-11 10:29 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2012-05-11 13:32 -0500
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-05-11 20:01 +0100
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2012-05-08 22:25 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2012-05-08 21:29 -0500
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2012-05-09 09:56 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-09 09:17 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2012-05-09 16:23 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-09 10:38 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2012-05-09 16:54 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-09 12:23 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2012-05-11 13:23 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-11 07:38 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2012-05-11 15:44 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-11 10:30 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2012-05-11 13:38 -0500
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2012-05-14 10:48 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2012-05-09 11:34 -0500
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-09 11:30 -0700
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-09 15:52 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-09 13:46 -0700
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-09 09:10 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2012-05-10 00:19 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-09 15:28 -0700
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-09 23:53 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-10 13:15 -0700
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-05-10 21:48 +0100
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-10 17:05 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-10 14:29 -0700
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-10 19:35 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-10 18:50 -0700
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-10 22:22 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-11 10:03 -0700
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-11 13:56 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2012-05-11 11:58 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-11 06:51 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2012-05-11 21:11 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-11 15:29 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2012-05-11 21:53 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-11 18:11 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2012-05-12 01:00 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-11 20:44 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-05-12 00:38 +0100
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-05-12 00:36 +0100
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-05-11 14:01 +0100
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-11 10:34 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Shake <alex.estevezQUENO@QUENOfilnet.es> - 2012-05-11 20:58 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-11 15:30 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Shake <alex.estevezQUENO@QUENOfilnet.es> - 2012-05-11 21:46 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-11 18:14 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Shake <alex.estevezQUENO@QUENOfilnet.es> - 2012-05-12 14:42 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-12 11:04 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Shake <alex.estevezQUENO@QUENOfilnet.es> - 2012-05-12 18:40 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-12 15:49 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-05-12 22:59 +0100
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Shake <alex.estevezQUENO@QUENOfilnet.es> - 2012-05-13 13:46 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2012-05-13 07:50 -0500
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Anders Wegge Keller <wegge@wegge.dk> - 2012-05-13 16:15 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-13 10:36 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-13 09:06 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Shake <alex.estevezQUENO@QUENOfilnet.es> - 2012-05-13 18:54 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-13 13:27 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2012-05-13 22:26 -0500
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Shake <QUITAESTO@QUITAESTO.NOES> - 2012-05-14 09:51 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-14 08:04 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Shake <QUITAESTO@QUITAESTO.NOES> - 2012-05-14 14:25 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-14 09:37 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Shake <QUITAESTO@QUITAESTO.NOES> - 2012-05-14 16:22 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2012-05-14 16:45 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-14 14:07 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2012-05-14 22:37 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-14 17:47 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-05-14 16:53 +0100
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-14 14:06 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Shake <alex.estevezQUENO@QUENOfilnet.es> - 2012-05-14 20:36 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-14 14:53 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2012-05-14 23:04 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-14 17:48 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2012-05-14 23:00 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-14 17:57 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-05-12 00:38 +0100
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-11 20:46 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP PlastiqueMAN <plastique@man.com> - 2012-05-23 22:45 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-24 00:18 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Stig Vestøl <stig@vestoldata.no> - 2012-05-24 11:40 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Shake <QUITAESTO@QUITAESTO.NOES> - 2012-05-24 12:00 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-24 09:12 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Shake <QUITAESTO@QUITAESTO.NOES> - 2012-05-24 16:29 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2012-05-24 20:41 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-24 15:17 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2012-05-11 21:53 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-11 18:15 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2012-05-12 10:00 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-12 07:29 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2012-05-12 06:47 -0500
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-05-12 00:40 +0100
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-05-11 01:07 +0100
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-09 23:53 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2012-05-10 08:49 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-10 08:02 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2012-05-10 21:09 +0200
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-10 15:32 -0400
            Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Dominique Ottello <air.intakes@fra.fr.invalid> - 2012-05-16 17:56 +0200
              Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-16 12:35 -0400
                Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Dominique Ottello <air.intakes@fra.fr.invalid> - 2012-05-16 19:35 +0200
      Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-05-06 18:30 +0200
        Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP Dominique Ottello <air.intakes@fra.fr.invalid> - 2012-05-06 19:04 +0200
      Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2012-05-12 16:45 +0200
  Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP "Álvaro G. Vicario" <alvaro.NOSPAMTHANX@demogracia.com.invalid> - 2012-05-08 09:49 +0200

csiph-web