Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.php > #4541
| From | Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.php |
| Subject | Re: approaches to PHP-based application interface? |
| Date | 2012-01-20 07:03 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jfbl5r$3u8$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <9nssjiFfspU1@mid.uni-berlin.de> <4f1943fa$0$6847$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <jfbhol$1jg$1@news.albasani.net> <4f194ee9$0$6943$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <jfbjh3$55b$1@news.albasani.net> |
On 1/20/2012 6:34 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > Erwin Moller wrote: >> On 1/20/2012 12:04 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> Erwin Moller wrote: >>>> On 1/20/2012 11:05 AM, M. Strobel wrote: >>>>> Am 20.01.2012 10:43, schrieb crankypuss: >>>> >>>> <snip> >>>> >>>>>> Thank you for your opinion, but I've done "true GUI programming" and >>>>>> I've had a >>>>>> bellyful of talking paper-clips and wiggling icons. >>>>> >>>>> Yeah. But the forced limitations in web design is not the solution. >>>> >>>> Hi Strobel, >>>> >>>> You cannot say that in such general terms. >>>> If you are fluent in PHP and web-related technics, it is very tempting >>>> to want more and develop desktop-apps using those technologies. >>>> I know I want to. >>>> Comparing them to slow M$ stuff makes no sense. >>>> M$ seldom do things right. >>>> >>> >>> >>> Look in philosophical terms what you are saying here is more or less 'I >>> want to use a browser and associated web server as my GUI API rather >>> than the underlying native GUI API' >>> >> >> Exactly. >> That is exactly what I am saying. >> >> >>> >>> Which is all fine and dandy if that GUI suits the application. >> >> Of course. >> That goes without saying, I presumed. >> If it didn't another approach would be advisable. >> >>> >>> And is one accepts platform independent and WAN ready from the word >>> 'go'. >>> >>> BUT is not always the optimal paradigm, and usually means writing in >>> rather badly implemented and poor languages, that are deliberately >>> crippled for security reasons - javascript/PHP and the like. >> >> "optimal paradigm" can mean anything, depending on the situation. >> In case you need speed: Go C(++), or even assembly, and write smart >> fast code. >> In case you need supersmall memory footprint (like sometimes in >> embedded software): Go assembly. >> In case you want a very high level to approach a problem: Throw in >> some framework, or do it yourself in some high level language. >> etc.etc. >> >> And I do not understand why you deem PHP a "deliberately crippled >> language for security reasons", because it isn't. >> > > well in the sense that apache or whatever invokes it with apaches own > privileges and the concept of a users own privileges is not inherent in it. > > Which has absolutely nothing to do with the language. But you don't understand the difference. > >> Also, Javascript isn't crippled at all. > > Perhaps you need to write more of it. It cannot access much at all. It > has no concept of full system access. > > It cant even access a local printer.. > Which has absolutely nothing to do with the language. But you don't understand the difference. >> I think you are confusing Javascript implementation in browsers with >> the language itself. >> Of course the browser must "cripple" the language by not exposing >> everything on the computer to the language. >> > > Of course thats what I mean. The language on its own as an intellectual > abstraction is as worthless as piece of used toilet paper when what you > have is a browser running (a usually highly buggy) implemenation of it. > Which has absolutely nothing to do with the language. But you don't understand the difference. >> Your way of thinking is like saying: "No animal can fly because I know >> of a dog who cannot fly." >> Javascript isn't a crippled language. It's implementation is browsers >> is (luckily) "crippled". Big difference. >> > > No, My stance is more 'pigs may fly, in theory, but I have yet to find > one that did' > >> >>> >>> That's not to say you can't write web apps but it is possibly making a >>> rod for your own back if you do. >> >> I am not sure what you mean by that. >> > > I am saying that when all you decide to use is a hammer, you may find > watchmaking a difficult task. > >> Regards, >> Erwin Moller >> But these are typical comments from you. No wonder you try to hide behind a 'nym. You wouldn't want a possible employer to find out just how stoopid you are. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle JDS Computer Training Corp. jstucklex@attglobal.net ==================
Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
approaches to PHP-based application interface? crankypuss <no@email.thanks> - 2012-01-19 04:18 -0700
Re: approaches to PHP-based application interface? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-19 15:00 +0000
Re: approaches to PHP-based application interface? crankypuss <no@email.thanks> - 2012-01-20 01:53 -0700
Re: approaches to PHP-based application interface? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-20 10:27 +0100
Re: approaches to PHP-based application interface? crankypuss <no@email.thanks> - 2012-01-20 02:43 -0700
Re: approaches to PHP-based application interface? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-20 11:05 +0100
Re: approaches to PHP-based application interface? Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2012-01-20 11:37 +0100
Re: approaches to PHP-based application interface? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-20 11:04 +0000
Re: approaches to PHP-based application interface? Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2012-01-20 12:24 +0100
Re: approaches to PHP-based application interface? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-20 11:34 +0000
Re: approaches to PHP-based application interface? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-20 07:03 -0500
Re: approaches to PHP-based application interface? Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2012-01-20 13:13 +0100
Re: approaches to PHP-based application interface? Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2012-01-20 10:43 +0100
Re: approaches to PHP-based application interface? crankypuss <no@email.thanks> - 2012-01-20 05:21 -0700
Re: approaches to PHP-based application interface? Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2012-01-20 14:46 +0100
Re: approaches to PHP-based application interface? "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2012-01-21 12:10 -0600
Re: approaches to PHP-based application interface? Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2012-01-26 16:12 +0100
csiph-web