Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.php > #10036
| From | "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.php |
| Subject | Re: Sandbox |
| Date | 2013-07-05 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <b3okj2F2j0tU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <kr6dlm$94g$1@dont-email.me> <b3oa93Fbn7U1@mid.individual.net> <kr6tba$v2g$1@dont-email.me> <b3oebaF17k8U1@mid.individual.net> <kr756b$dlo$1@dont-email.me> |
On 05/07/13 21:07, Jerry Stuckle wrote: > On 7/5/2013 1:33 PM, J.O. Aho wrote: >> On 05/07/13 18:53, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >>> On 7/5/2013 12:24 PM, J.O. Aho wrote: >>>> On 05/07/13 14:25, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >>>>> On 7/5/2013 7:38 AM, sanjayrathod273@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> HEy guys Help me >>>>>> >>>>>> I want to use sandbox for my site's security. below is the link of >>>>>> method which i want to use >>>>>> http://php.net/manual/en/runkit.sandbox.php. >>>>>> >>>>>> but when i am run the code of that page it says sandbox class not >>>>>> defined. >>>>>> so anyone can guide me through this step by step. >>>>>> Please help me my site has down due to hacking. i want to use for >>>>>> this >>>>>> site >>>>>> http://web.guru99.com/demo-editor-php/ >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Look at the documentation - you need the runkit PECL class. But that >>>>> has not been updated for seven years and will not compile with PHP >>>>> versions > 5.2. It looks like you're out of luck. >>>>> >>>>> But then while I think what you're trying to do is admirable, I don't >>>>> think you'll be able to stop hacking without pretty much crippling >>>>> your >>>>> users. Anyone developing (or learning) PHP should have their own >>>>> development environment, anyway. >>>>> >>>> >>>> There are other options to "sandbox" the users, suExec will give you >>>> some capabilities and then on you can also run the apache in a chroot >>>> environment. This way you can limit the access through the webserver to >>>> the rest of the server environment and limit the sites from accessing >>>> each others data. I usually apply the suhosin to the php and set a bit >>>> limitation that way too. Doing all that you need of course a Linux/Unix >>>> server. >>>> >>> >>> Yes, but look at his site. He's trying to create an online PHP executor >>> for people to use. Your suggestions won't help there - it's impossible >>> to use them to limit access to the files from user-developed code >>> (evidently executed with eval()) while still making it available to the >>> installed code. >> >> *nods* >> >>> And limiting things like file functions in his php.ini file will not >>> only limit the functions for user-developed code, but for the code on >>> the site itself. >> >> yeah, you are right, but just let us play things a little bit before >> giving up. >> >> 1. If we start with running the apache in a chroot, we eliminate the >> access to system files. >> > > True, but giving the Apache user very limited rights by itself would > prevent access to system files (but not other website files, of course). > >> 2. Then we run the suExec for the site and php with suhosin, to make >> things a little bit safer in the environment which will be "executing >> the code". >> > > This would definitely make things a lot safer. But you'd still have to > have at least the PHP script being executed available. There doesn't > need to be a lot in that page, however, and careful programming (i.e. no > passwords, no other file accesses, etc.) would make it safe even if the > code was exposed. > >> 3. Instead of using eval to run the user imputed code, we use fpm to >> execute it and set the fpm to use another php.ini than the suExec >> environment Running the fpm in it's own nested chroot, will prevent it >> from accessing those files in the general apache chroot. >> > > Hadn't though about this. It could easily work - i.e. create a page on > the fly from the user's code then execute that page. Permissions might > be a problem, but could be worked out, I guess. > >> Of course this would require a custom made PHP page to handle a such >> setup, but could in theory work, but should be well tested before >> releasing to the wide world web. >> >> Any thoughts about this, or do you see a flaw in my thought? >> > > No obvious flaws, anyway. I guess the biggest part would be he'd need > his own server or VPS as these would require changes to the PHP > executable which a shared host wouldn't be interested in making. Of course, and if there would be a shared host who would be prepared to do so much for a customer, I think I would switch to another safe one, for I think a shared host who does as all their customers want would have a lot of security issues. > Offhand, I'd say it could work, but I'd have to think about it a lot > more, and play with it. But it's not interesting enough to me to spend > a lot of time on it. Same for me, just a theoretical though of a possibility to do it. > A great idea, though. Thanks :) On 05/07/13 20:23, Denis McMahon wrote: > On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 19:33:30 +0200, J.O. Aho wrote: >> Any thoughts about this, or do you see a flaw in my thought? > > I don't know enough to comment generally on your suggestions - but I > go with Jerry's premise that anyone developing php should have their > own dev platform, it's not that hard to set up wamp / lamp out of the > box on your system, or in a vm, or for that matter on a free aws host > (although the memory limit on the latter might be an issue?). If you are going with Suhosin, then wamp is out of the question, it only works on Linux/Unix, don't think it even works on aamp. The other parts may. Memory print shouldn't be much more than for a standard setup, but sure the fpm would take up some of the memory and make less things left for the users script. -- //Aho
Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Sandbox sanjayrathod273@gmail.com - 2013-07-05 04:38 -0700
Re: Sandbox Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-07-05 08:25 -0400
Re: Sandbox "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2013-07-05 18:24 +0200
Re: Sandbox Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-07-05 12:53 -0400
Re: Sandbox "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2013-07-05 19:33 +0200
Re: Sandbox Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-07-05 18:23 +0000
Re: Sandbox Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-07-05 15:07 -0400
Re: Sandbox "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2013-07-05 21:20 +0200
csiph-web