Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.php > #7954

Re: Current PHP implementation

Message-ID <6256648.bYOWBrgMpT@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Date 2012-12-27 01:54 +0100
Subject Re: Current PHP implementation
Newsgroups comp.lang.php
References (1 earlier) <kbdod7$i6j$1@dont-email.me> <hvvqq9-ept.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan> <timstreater-E8DECC.10430326122012@news.individual.net> <v8krq9-m96.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan> <slrnkdmgig.4ja.hellsop@nibelheim.ninehells.com>
Followup-To comp.lang.php

Followups directed to: comp.lang.php

Show all headers | View raw


Peter H. Coffin wrote:

> Fine. I'll do it. It will be correct, within the contexts of PHP.

And unsurprisingly, what you posted is not even close to being correct, the 
PHP part included.
 
> 1. It depends on how the webserver processes things. Typically there
> will be ten processes spawned.  Then processes will exist so long as they
> have work to do, then exit when they are done or the process timer
> expires.

No, typically (read: apache-mpm-prefork on a Linux-based system) there will 
be two server processes that have 10 threads each, which will continue to 
run until the server is shut down.

In any case, with PHP run by server module or FastCGI, the parent process 
will like *never* exit as long as the server system is running uninterrupted 
(i.e., without reboot and maintenance).

Started threads will likely exist until the Web server service is stopped.  
New child processes will be created if the number of threads in a child 
process exceed the specified maximum.  Threads in a child process will be 
created so as to meet the specified minimum and number of spare threads.

> Now, was that helpful?

No.

> Probably not.

So you figured.  But you posted this utter nonsense anyway?  You have way 
too much time on your hands.

> […] You even made me look at a w3sc***ls page to make sure I didn't miss
> something,

There is nothing to be gained from reading a “w3sc***ls page” and much to be 
lost.  Most of all, clarity of thought and overall mental sanity.  Of which 
your posting is a good example.

> and now I feel like I need a shower.

Me too.


PointedEars
-- 
When all you know is jQuery, every problem looks $(olvable).

Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Current PHP implementation "SL@maxis" <noreply@my-rialto.com> - 2012-12-26 09:51 +0800
  Re: Current PHP implementation Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-12-25 21:45 -0500
    Re: Current PHP implementation Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2012-12-26 11:26 +0100
      Re: Current PHP implementation Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-12-26 10:43 +0000
        Re: Current PHP implementation The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-12-26 12:15 +0000
        Re: Current PHP implementation Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-12-26 08:55 -0500
        Re: Current PHP implementation Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2012-12-26 17:12 +0100
          Re: Current PHP implementation "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2012-12-26 12:30 -0600
            Re: Current PHP implementation Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2012-12-26 20:51 +0100
              Re: Current PHP implementation Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-12-26 15:29 -0500
                Re: Current PHP implementation Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2012-12-27 19:37 +0100
                Re: Current PHP implementation Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-12-27 16:10 -0500
                Re: Current PHP implementation "Twayne" <nobody@devnull.spamcop.net> - 2012-12-27 21:28 -0500
                Re: Current PHP implementation Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-12-27 21:34 -0500
                Re: Current PHP implementation Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-12-28 09:18 +0000
                Re: Current PHP implementation Paul Herber <paul@pherber.com> - 2012-12-28 16:33 +0000
            Re: Current PHP implementation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-12-27 01:54 +0100
              Re: Current PHP implementation Anders Wegge Keller <wegge@wegge.dk> - 2012-12-27 02:31 +0100
                Re: Current PHP implementation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-12-27 12:39 +0100
    Re: Current PHP implementation Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-12-26 13:45 +0000
  Re: Current PHP implementation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-12-26 13:40 +0100

csiph-web