Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.php > #4315
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.php |
| Subject | Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? |
| Date | Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:48:22 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 51 |
| Message-ID | <4F09F306.90700@arnowelzel.de> (permalink) |
| References | <apkpf7pepdppho2ve4fr8nu8u087hmcakl@4ax.com> <4F046877.3080409@arnowelzel.de> <4f05a0b4$0$6924$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <9mmq09F283U1@mid.uni-berlin.de> <je5fng$orh$1@dont-email.me> <je6khb$uua$1@news.albasani.net> <je6t5d$ivk$1@dont-email.me> <9moonbF38cU1@mid.uni-berlin.de> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="Psb2+p0U7wkhKleuxO8/EQ"; logging-data="23699"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18bMePi3zvP6QYM/i6BBcEizr4C/E51KK0=" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 |
| In-Reply-To | <9moonbF38cU1@mid.uni-berlin.de> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:5j1usattoMpMiqu17tvLmZSv8HA= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.php:4315 |
Show key headers only | View raw
M. Strobel, 2012-01-06 18:18: > Am 06.01.2012 14:32, schrieb Jerry Stuckle: >> On 1/6/2012 6:05 AM, Thomas Mlynarczyk wrote: >>> Jerry Stuckle schrieb: >>> >>>> $REQUESTS is quite dangerous. You never know whether it comes >>>> from >>>> $_GET, $_POST or $_COOKIE, for instance. >>> >>> True, you don't know. But does it matter? The only problem I >>> see is that >>> the order of precedence of the three input sources depends on >>> the PHP >>> configuration, but aside from that, the script is given a >>> "foo=bar" and >>> a hacker could always send that via any of GET, POST or COOKIE. >>> So my >>> script should not be dependent on that. I find it rather >>> convenient to >>> be able to send commands/arguments to my script via any of the >>> three >>> methods. >>> >>> Greetings, >>> Thomas >>> >> >> No, it doesn't matter if you aren't concerned about security. >> > > I think programming leaves enough room for everybody to use $_GET > and $_POST to their liking, but > > $_REQUEST is no more dangerous than one of GPC. > > There are some programming mantras you have to keep on saying, > this is not one of it. In fact, PHP has a lot of "historical" security flaws and i agree it is not a good idea to use $_REQUEST instead of $_POST or $_GET. My "hack" to avoid Magic Quotes without changing existing code uses $_REQUEST only, because existing code - which may not be my own code - may rely on it. -- Arno Welzel http://arnowelzel.de http://de-rec-fahrrad.de
Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Michael Joel <no@please.com> - 2011-12-29 15:55 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2011-12-29 22:04 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Michael Joel <no@please.com> - 2011-12-29 16:53 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Michael Joel <no@please.com> - 2011-12-29 17:08 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2011-12-29 23:22 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2011-12-29 17:53 -0600
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Michael Joel <no@please.com> - 2011-12-29 23:32 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Erwin Moller <Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spamyourself.com> - 2011-12-30 12:38 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Michael Joel <no@please.com> - 2011-12-30 09:52 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Erwin Moller <Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spamyourself.com> - 2012-01-02 15:02 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2011-12-30 13:18 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? "Álvaro G. Vicario" <alvaro.NOSPAMTHANX@demogracia.com.invalid> - 2011-12-30 10:26 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Erwin Moller <Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spamyourself.com> - 2011-12-30 14:42 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Michael Joel <no@please.com> - 2011-12-30 09:52 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-04 15:55 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Erwin Moller <Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spamyourself.com> - 2012-01-05 14:08 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-05 14:22 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-05 13:36 +0000
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Erwin Moller <Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spamyourself.com> - 2012-01-05 15:20 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-05 15:49 +0000
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Erwin Moller <Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spamyourself.com> - 2012-01-05 14:39 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-06 00:28 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-05 19:36 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Erwin Moller <Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spamyourself.com> - 2012-01-06 11:16 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2012-01-06 12:05 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-06 08:32 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-06 18:18 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-06 13:04 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-08 20:48 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2012-01-06 20:14 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-06 20:24 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-06 19:34 +0000
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-06 21:11 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-06 18:12 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2012-01-07 17:59 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-07 15:54 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2012-01-08 02:13 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-07 20:33 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2012-01-09 00:21 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-08 19:05 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-08 20:52 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-08 15:59 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-11 11:00 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-11 11:53 +0000
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-11 08:45 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-11 15:43 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-11 08:44 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-11 15:47 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-11 09:51 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-11 18:09 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-11 14:01 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-12 08:58 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-06 17:41 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-06 13:05 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Erwin Moller <Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spamyourself.com> - 2012-01-06 11:07 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-06 18:05 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-06 13:07 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-01-06 19:45 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-06 18:09 -0500
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2012-01-07 18:08 +0100
Re: Magic quotes? Should I still be cautious? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-07 15:59 -0500
csiph-web