Re: Top 10 Wrong Ideas About PHP

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder.news-service.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-ID	<2252193.AGpSg30B87@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
From	Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Reply-To	Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <php@PointedEars.de>
Organization	PointedEars Software (PES)
Date	Sat, 27 Aug 2011 20:02:17 +0200
User-Agent	KNode/4.4.11
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8Bit
Subject	Re: Top 10 Wrong Ideas About PHP
Newsgroups	comp.lang.php
References	<3179984.HZ2dv9Jhb0@PointedEars.de> <j39hq2$d9a$1@dont-email.me>
Followup-To	comp.lang.php
MIME-Version	1.0
Lines	40
NNTP-Posting-Date	27 Aug 2011 20:02:18 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host	f0830953.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace	DXC=5c74`3b8QfP[7Non7UCi8U4IUK<Cl32<Q4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[Lf0HJ8I\J]^DZm8W4\YJN\b@mF9jNikdU_dXMBNGELEQUVaSP;SiB8X
X-Complaints-To	usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.php:2971

Followups directed to: comp.lang.php

Show key headers only | View raw

Twayne wrote:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> typed:
>> having become a subscriber of PHP Classes recently, I
>> have learned of an article that attempts to clarify
>> certain misconceptions people might have about PHP (some
>> of which have already been discussed here), that you
>> might find interesting, too.  The author's "Top 10 Wrong
>> Ideas About PHP" are:
>>
>> 1. PHP is not a compiled language (it is interpreted)
> 
> There is no such thing as a "compiled language". It's the apps and scripts
> written wth a language that are compiled. And PHP IS compilable! I use
> Inno for a compiler here when it's something I'm not sure where it'll end
> up.
> 
> […]

I am getting the idea that some of you have not read my posting carefully 
enough, have therefore misunderstood it, and that some of you have not read 
the referred article at all.  To clarify: It is neither me nor the author of 
the article that has said misconceptions.  So there really is no point in 
arguing that blog entries would be unreliable.  In fact, the author explains 
*why* the listed statements are misconceptions about PHP, and I had found 
his reasoning rather logical.

I wanted to inform about this article, as I had found it enlightening.
I did not know that there are actually people hating PHP for various 
(dubious) reasons.  I hoped for a serious discussion about the arguments of 
the author, maybe the comments that followed, and other wrong ideas about 
PHP that could be clarified; really not a confirmation of what was written.

PointedEars
-- 
Prototype.js was written by people who don't know javascript for people
who don't know javascript. People who don't know javascript are not
the best source of advice on designing systems that use javascript.
  -- Richard Cornford, cljs, <f806at$ail$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk>

Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Top 10 Wrong Ideas About PHP Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-08-26 21:14 +0200
  Re: Top 10 Wrong Ideas About PHP The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-08-26 20:42 +0100
  Re: Top 10 Wrong Ideas About PHP "A" <a@a.a> - 2011-08-27 00:56 +0200
  Re: Top 10 Wrong Ideas About PHP "Twayne" <nobody@devnull.spamcop.net> - 2011-08-26 21:37 -0400
    Re: Top 10 Wrong Ideas About PHP "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2011-08-26 21:58 -0400
      Re: Top 10 Wrong Ideas About PHP The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-08-27 09:15 +0100
      Re: Top 10 Wrong Ideas About PHP Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-08-27 18:20 -0400
    Re: Top 10 Wrong Ideas About PHP Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-08-27 20:02 +0200

csiph-web