Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.php > #17472
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.php |
| Subject | Re: Arguments on a button |
| Date | 2017-06-07 22:35 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <10854412.O9o76ZdvQC@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <be64366d-5484-4569-a97c-dab6238b13c0@googlegroups.com> <ogrrin$4qu$1@dont-email.me> <ogrs08$6o1$1@dont-email.me> <3988954.LvFx2qVVIh@PointedEars.de> <oh77me$6k3$1@solani.org> |
Christoph M. Becker wrote: > On 06.06.2017 at 20:53, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Lew Pitcher wrote: >>> Or, more generally (including some HTML formatting) >>> <form method="post" action="page2.php"> >>> <dl> >>> <dt>Fruit:</dt> >>> <dd><input type="text" name="fruit"/></dd> >>> <dt>Veggie:</dt> >>> <dd><input type="text" name="veggies"/></dd> >>> <dt>Submit:</dt> >>> <dd><input type="submit"/></dd> >>> </dl> >>> </form> >> >> This abuse of *definition lists* (dl) is common in certain CMSs, but not >> something that should be repeated. > > I wouldn't use a definition list, either. However, the HTML 5.1 > specification states[1]: > > | Term-description groups may be names and definitions, questions and > | answers, categories and topics, or any other groups of > | term-description pairs. > > This suggest a rather loose interpretation, and as such the example > above may not be considered abuse. You are mistaken. A label and a corresponding form control is _not_ a “term–description pair” at all. And by “questions and answers”, “label and corresponding form control” is most definitely _not_ meant; rather, that which you can find in a FAQ. -- PointedEars Zend Certified PHP Engineer <http://www.zend.com/en/yellow-pages/ZEND024953> <https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Arguments on a button bit-naughty@hotmail.com - 2017-06-02 06:25 -0700
Re: Arguments on a button Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2017-06-02 10:12 -0400
Re: Arguments on a button Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2017-06-02 10:19 -0400
Re: Arguments on a button Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-06 20:53 +0200
Re: Arguments on a button "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2017-06-06 23:44 +0200
Re: Arguments on a button Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-07 22:35 +0200
Re: Arguments on a button Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-06-02 11:35 -0500
Re: Arguments on a button Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2017-06-02 12:51 -0400
Re: Arguments on a button Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2017-06-03 10:39 -0400
Re: Arguments on a button "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2017-06-05 19:41 +0200
Re: Arguments on a button Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2017-06-05 14:02 -0400
csiph-web