Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #97480 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-01-20 00:59 +0100 |
| Last post | 2024-01-20 11:06 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: ANN: Dogelog Player 1.1.4 (Generational GC) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-01-20 00:59 +0100
Re: ANN: Dogelog Player 1.1.4 (Generational GC) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-01-20 11:06 +0100
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-01-20 00:59 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: ANN: Dogelog Player 1.1.4 (Generational GC) |
| Message-ID | <uof2cb$m4av$2@solani.org> |
Dogelog Player is a 100% Prolog written Prolog interpreter. We started seeding the implementation of a common HTTP Server library for all targets JavaScript, Python and Java. Lets take a snapshot of the current API and report some performance experience. We could complete a minimal library(spin) and demonstrate the correct UTF-8 HTTP streaming of a text stream. We then measured the local delivery of a hobbit.txt file of 50'000 bytes, we also run against SWI-Prolog. We were positively surprised by the performance of JavaScript, Java and SWI-Prolog. Only the Python performance was a little disappointing. See also: Streaming HTTP for Dogelog Player https://twitter.com/dogelogch/status/1748477496364818517 Streaming HTTP for Dogelog Player https://www.facebook.com/groups/dogelog
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-01-20 11:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uog5un$ml7a$3@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #97480 |
Our initial testing with CPython was consistently very disappointing, so that we switched to PyPy, the alternative JIT-ing implementation of Python. With running Doglog Player via PyPy it becomes comparable in performance to the JavaScript target, both targets now only lack by ca 50% behind the Java target and SWI-Prolog. See also: Streaming HTTP for Dogelog Player [corrected] https://twitter.com/dogelogch/status/1748646455999332354 Streaming HTTP for Dogelog Player [corrected] https://www.facebook.com/groups/dogelog Mild Shock schrieb: > > Dogelog Player is a 100% Prolog written Prolog > interpreter. We started seeding the implementation > of a common HTTP Server library for all targets > JavaScript, Python and Java. Lets take a snapshot of > the current API and report some performance experience. > > We could complete a minimal library(spin) and > demonstrate the correct UTF-8 HTTP streaming of a > text stream. We then measured the local delivery of > a hobbit.txt file of 50'000 bytes, we also run > against SWI-Prolog. We were positively surprised by > the performance of JavaScript, Java and SWI-Prolog. > Only the Python performance was a little disappointing. > > > See also: > > Streaming HTTP for Dogelog Player > https://twitter.com/dogelogch/status/1748477496364818517 > > Streaming HTTP for Dogelog Player > https://www.facebook.com/groups/dogelog
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript
csiph-web