Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #35260 > unrolled thread

Recording changes to an object

Started byAndrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com>
First post2018-06-21 15:54 +1000
Last post2018-06-21 17:01 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 90 — 11 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript

Contents

  Recording changes to an object Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-21 15:54 +1000
    Re: Recording changes to an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-06-21 01:47 -0700
    Re: Recording changes to an object Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-06-21 17:01 +0100
      Re: Recording changes to an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-06-21 09:48 -0700
        Re: Recording changes to an object John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-06-22 09:58 +0100
    Re: Recording changes to an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-21 21:03 +0200
      Re: Recording changes to an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-06-21 16:25 -0700
      Re: Recording changes to an object Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-22 09:34 +1000
        Re: Recording changes to an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-06-21 17:02 -0700
          Re: Recording changes to an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-06-21 18:03 -0700
          Re: Recording changes to an object John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-06-22 10:06 +0100
            Re: Recording changes to an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-06-22 02:21 -0700
              Re: Recording changes to an object John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-06-22 18:31 +0100
                Re: Recording changes to an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-06-22 20:16 -0700
        Re: Recording changes to an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-22 02:23 +0200
          Re: Recording changes to an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-06-21 17:31 -0700
        Re: Recording changes to an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-22 02:55 +0200
          Re: Recording changes to an object Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-22 12:37 +1000
            Re: Recording changes to an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-06-22 02:23 -0700
              Re: Recording changes to an object Jake Jarvis <pig_in_shoes@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-22 14:35 +0200
                Re: Recording changes to an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-06-22 05:57 -0700
                  Re: Recording changes to an object Mickey Finn <mfinn@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 15:43 -0300
                Re: Recording changes to an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-22 13:51 +0200
                  Re: Recording changes to an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-06-22 06:04 -0700
                  Re: Recording changes to an object John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-06-22 18:33 +0100
                    Re: Recording changes to an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-24 14:36 +0200
                      Re: Recording changes to an object "Mark-" <nospam@mapson.xyz> - 2018-06-24 13:56 +0000
                      Re: Recording changes to an object John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-06-25 10:06 +0100
                        Re: Recording changes to an object Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 02:40 -0700
                          Re: Recording changes to an object Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 02:47 -0700
                            Re: Recording changes to an object Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 02:51 -0700
                              Re: Recording changes to an object Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 02:54 -0700
                                Re: Recording changes to an object Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 02:58 -0700
                      Re: Recording changes to an object John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-06-25 19:26 +0100
                        Re: Recording changes to an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-30 19:47 +0200
                          Re: Recording changes to an object John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-07-01 10:56 +0100
              Re: Recording changes to an object Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-23 17:19 +1000
                Re: Recording changes to an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-06-23 00:51 -0700
                  Re: Recording changes to an object John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-06-23 11:27 +0100
                  Re: Recording changes to an object Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-23 20:59 +1000
                    Re: Recording changes to an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-06-23 05:51 -0700
      Re: Recording changes to an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-30 19:43 +0200
        Re: Recording changes to an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-01 15:22 +0200
          Re: Recording changes to an object Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 16:29 +0200
            Cloning an object (was: Recording changes to an object) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-04 23:25 +0200
              Re: Cloning an object Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2018-07-05 10:00 +0200
                Re: Cloning an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-05 19:49 +0200
                  Re: Cloning an object Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2018-07-05 20:37 +0200
                    Re: Cloning an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-05 23:35 +0200
                      Re: Cloning an object Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2018-07-05 23:54 +0200
                        Re: Cloning an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-06 00:32 +0200
                    Re: Cloning an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-06 00:24 +0200
                      Re: Cloning an object John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-07-06 18:48 +0100
                        Re: Cloning an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-06 23:51 +0200
                          Re: Cloning an object John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-07-07 15:51 +0100
                            Re: Cloning an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-07-07 08:39 -0700
                              Re: Cloning an object John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-07-09 10:20 +0100
                                Re: Cloning an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-07-09 02:35 -0700
                                Re: Cloning an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-07-09 02:41 -0700
                            Re: Cloning an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-08 12:20 +0200
                          Re: Cloning an object John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-07-08 14:38 +0100
                            Re: Cloning an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-07-08 13:10 -0700
                              Re: Cloning an object John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-07-09 09:48 +0100
                                Re: Cloning an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-07-09 02:28 -0700
                                  Re: Cloning an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-07-09 02:38 -0700
                              Re: Cloning an object John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2018-07-09 19:11 +0100
        Re: Recording changes to an object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-07-02 21:01 -0700
          Re: Recording changes to an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-05 00:32 +0200
            Re: Recording changes to an object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-07-04 19:23 -0700
              Re: Recording changes to an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-05 06:38 +0200
                Re: Recording changes to an object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-07-04 23:21 -0700
                  Re: Recording changes to an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-05 09:25 +0200
                    Re: Recording changes to an object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-07-05 07:44 -0700
                      Re: Recording changes to an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-05 19:35 +0200
                        Re: Recording changes to an object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-07-06 12:59 -0700
                          Re: Recording changes to an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-06 23:22 +0200
                            Re: Recording changes to an object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-07-07 12:45 -0700
                              Re: Recording changes to an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-08 11:13 +0200
                                Re: Recording changes to an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-07-08 05:03 -0700
                                  Re: Recording changes to an object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-07-08 13:42 -0700
                                    Re: Recording changes to an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-07-08 13:46 -0700
                                Re: Recording changes to an object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-07-08 13:41 -0700
                                  Re: Recording changes to an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-09 00:35 +0200
                                    Re: Recording changes to an object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-07-10 01:03 -0700
                                      Re: Recording changes to an object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-10 20:50 +0200
                                        Re: Recording changes to an object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-07-10 16:09 -0700
    Re: Recording changes to an object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-06-21 15:09 -0700
      Re: Recording changes to an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-06-21 16:30 -0700
        Re: Recording changes to an object "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2018-06-21 16:57 -0700
          Re: Recording changes to an object Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-06-21 17:01 -0700

Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →

#35283

FromJulio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name>
Date2018-06-22 05:57 -0700
Message-ID<b620752c-a1cb-4add-8f04-54d6fed74ec2@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#35282
On Friday, 22 June 2018 14:35:32 UTC+2, Jake Jarvis  wrote:
> Am 22.06.2018 um 11:23 schrieb Julio Di Egidio:
<snip>
> > *Plonk*
> 
> What is that *Plonk* thing?
> 
> Is that like "yoink" when stealing things? Just something you do?

It's the hard kick in the ass you morons deserved to begin with.

Suck my socks you shithead #928.

*Plonk*

Julio

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35288

FromMickey Finn <mfinn@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-22 15:43 -0300
Message-ID<pgjfvi$17h6$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#35283
Un troll chiamato Julio Di Egidio ha scritto:
> On Friday, 22 June 2018 14:35:32 UTC+2, Jake Jarvis  wrote:
>> Am 22.06.2018 um 11:23 schrieb Julio Di Egidio:
> <snip>
>>> *Plonk*
>>
>> What is that *Plonk* thing?
>>
>> Is that like "yoink" when stealing things? Just something you do?
> 
> It's the hard kick in the ass you morons deserved to begin with.
> 
> Suck my socks you shithead #928.


Shut the fuck up, mammone! You're the #929 LOL.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35284

FromThomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Date2018-06-22 13:51 +0200
Message-ID<1913999.xgot8XmKzy@PointedEars.de>
In reply to#35282
Jake Jarvis wrote:

> What is that *Plonk* thing?

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk_(Usenet)>

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
<https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35285

FromJulio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name>
Date2018-06-22 06:04 -0700
Message-ID<7a1005b5-37de-48a7-9c91-9cc7b733f69f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#35284
On Friday, 22 June 2018 14:59:27 UTC+2, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn  wrote:
> Jake Jarvis wrote:
> 
> > What is that *Plonk* thing?
> 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk_(Usenet)>

Which is WRONG and certainly NOT how I am using it.

You other utter moron and fraud...

*Plonk*

Julio

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35287

FromJohn G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid>
Date2018-06-22 18:33 +0100
Message-ID<klcqiddhj5j75fcnf88kua4r12foi96ph0@4ax.com>
In reply to#35284
On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:51:03 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
<PointedEars@web.de> wrote:

>Jake Jarvis wrote:
>
>> What is that *Plonk* thing?
>
><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk_(Usenet)>

There is another meaning, one that is more likely in this case. He is
saying that he is a plonker.

  John

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35296

FromThomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Date2018-06-24 14:36 +0200
Message-ID<5f80a6f9-93ba-05c9-ab27-0d57de16a72f@PointedEars.de>
In reply to#35287
John G Harris wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:51:03 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:

Attribution line, not attribution novel.  When will you finally get it?

>> Jake Jarvis wrote:
>>> What is that *Plonk* thing?
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk_(Usenet)>
> 
> There is another meaning, one that is more likely in this case. He is
> saying that he is a plonker.

Nonsense.

How many years are you abusing Usenet now, and still have no clue?


PointedEars
-- 
When all you know is jQuery, every problem looks $(olvable).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35297

From"Mark-" <nospam@mapson.xyz>
Date2018-06-24 13:56 +0000
Message-ID<pgo7uk$8qt$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#35296
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

> How many years are you abusing Usenet now, and still have no clue?

Said the pot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35300

FromJohn G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid>
Date2018-06-25 10:06 +0100
Message-ID<92c1jddjti9sa98tndetrk65p83l87sjrc@4ax.com>
In reply to#35296
On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 14:36:53 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
<PointedEars@web.de> wrote:

>John G Harris wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:51:03 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
>> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
>
>Attribution line, not attribution novel.  When will you finally get it?
>
>>> Jake Jarvis wrote:
>>>> What is that *Plonk* thing?
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk_(Usenet)>
>> 
>> There is another meaning, one that is more likely in this case. He is
>> saying that he is a plonker.
>
>Nonsense.
>
>How many years are you abusing Usenet now, and still have no clue?

What a silly reply.

a) In the English language, one who plonks is a plonker.

b) The word 'plonker' is to be found in English dictionaries, and is
appropriate for Julio. See, for instance,
  <https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/plonker>

  John

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35301

FromJonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-25 02:40 -0700
Message-ID<87bd14c7-c157-4a82-a47f-d0158e41715f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#35300
Den måndag 25 juni 2018 kl. 11:06:44 UTC+2 skrev John G Harris:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 14:36:53 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
> 
> >John G Harris wrote:
> >> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:51:03 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> >> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
> >
> >Attribution line, not attribution novel.  When will you finally get it?
> >
> >>> Jake Jarvis wrote:
> >>>> What is that *Plonk* thing?
> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk_(Usenet)>
> >> 
> >> There is another meaning, one that is more likely in this case. He is
> >> saying that he is a plonker.
> >
> >Nonsense.
> >
> >How many years are you abusing Usenet now, and still have no clue?
> 
> What a silly reply.
> 
> a) In the English language, one who plonks is a plonker.
> 
> b) The word 'plonker' is to be found in English dictionaries, and is
> appropriate for Julio. See, for instance,
>   <https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/plonker>
> 
>   John

The way i see it plonking is an inverted select, like for example the SQL of a newsgroup list "Select ALL ***PLONK*** genius" LoL

Here you can replace ***PLONK*** with "deselect or except" genius.

The one or thing that perform it is the plonker how ever, the dictionary is wrong it has nothing to do with the attributes of the one that get plonked or the attribute of the one that do the plonking. Plonk is a verb and means deselect.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35302

FromJonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-25 02:47 -0700
Message-ID<5e45fef6-0d50-46b0-97e6-1d5b6bb83850@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#35301
Den måndag 25 juni 2018 kl. 11:40:16 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> Den måndag 25 juni 2018 kl. 11:06:44 UTC+2 skrev John G Harris:
> > On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 14:36:53 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> > <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
> > 
> > >John G Harris wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:51:03 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> > >> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
> > >
> > >Attribution line, not attribution novel.  When will you finally get it?
> > >
> > >>> Jake Jarvis wrote:
> > >>>> What is that *Plonk* thing?
> > >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk_(Usenet)>
> > >> 
> > >> There is another meaning, one that is more likely in this case. He is
> > >> saying that he is a plonker.
> > >
> > >Nonsense.
> > >
> > >How many years are you abusing Usenet now, and still have no clue?
> > 
> > What a silly reply.
> > 
> > a) In the English language, one who plonks is a plonker.
> > 
> > b) The word 'plonker' is to be found in English dictionaries, and is
> > appropriate for Julio. See, for instance,
> >   <https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/plonker>
> > 
> >   John
> 
> The way i see it plonking is an inverted select, like for example the SQL of a newsgroup list "Select ALL ***PLONK*** genius" LoL
> 
> Here you can replace ***PLONK*** with "deselect or except" genius.
> 
> The one or thing that perform it is the plonker how ever, the dictionary is wrong it has nothing to do with the attributes of the one that get plonked or the attribute of the one that do the plonking. Plonk is a verb and means deselect.

But one can wonder if
 
Do while !=genius
OR
Do until genius is more appropriate?

I always prefered do until for some reason.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35304

FromJonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-25 02:51 -0700
Message-ID<ab0ebfa6-80c5-4012-8da4-39c93f4a7b21@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#35302
Den måndag 25 juni 2018 kl. 11:47:10 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> Den måndag 25 juni 2018 kl. 11:40:16 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> > Den måndag 25 juni 2018 kl. 11:06:44 UTC+2 skrev John G Harris:
> > > On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 14:36:53 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> > > <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
> > > 
> > > >John G Harris wrote:
> > > >> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:51:03 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> > > >> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >Attribution line, not attribution novel.  When will you finally get it?
> > > >
> > > >>> Jake Jarvis wrote:
> > > >>>> What is that *Plonk* thing?
> > > >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk_(Usenet)>
> > > >> 
> > > >> There is another meaning, one that is more likely in this case. He is
> > > >> saying that he is a plonker.
> > > >
> > > >Nonsense.
> > > >
> > > >How many years are you abusing Usenet now, and still have no clue?
> > > 
> > > What a silly reply.
> > > 
> > > a) In the English language, one who plonks is a plonker.
> > > 
> > > b) The word 'plonker' is to be found in English dictionaries, and is
> > > appropriate for Julio. See, for instance,
> > >   <https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/plonker>
> > > 
> > >   John
> > 
> > The way i see it plonking is an inverted select, like for example the SQL of a newsgroup list "Select ALL ***PLONK*** genius" LoL
> > 
> > Here you can replace ***PLONK*** with "deselect or except" genius.
> > 
> > The one or thing that perform it is the plonker how ever, the dictionary is wrong it has nothing to do with the attributes of the one that get plonked or the attribute of the one that do the plonking. Plonk is a verb and means deselect.
> 
> But one can wonder if
>  
> Do while !=genius
> OR
> Do until genius is more appropriate?
> 
> I always prefered do until for some reason.

I guess at lowlevel there is no difference, so it is just a semantic choice?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35305

FromJonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-25 02:54 -0700
Message-ID<6112f8c6-6bbb-41e1-a876-7ec1656eb50e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#35304
Den måndag 25 juni 2018 kl. 11:51:26 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> Den måndag 25 juni 2018 kl. 11:47:10 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> > Den måndag 25 juni 2018 kl. 11:40:16 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> > > Den måndag 25 juni 2018 kl. 11:06:44 UTC+2 skrev John G Harris:
> > > > On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 14:36:53 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> > > > <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > >John G Harris wrote:
> > > > >> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:51:03 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> > > > >> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >Attribution line, not attribution novel.  When will you finally get it?
> > > > >
> > > > >>> Jake Jarvis wrote:
> > > > >>>> What is that *Plonk* thing?
> > > > >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk_(Usenet)>
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> There is another meaning, one that is more likely in this case. He is
> > > > >> saying that he is a plonker.
> > > > >
> > > > >Nonsense.
> > > > >
> > > > >How many years are you abusing Usenet now, and still have no clue?
> > > > 
> > > > What a silly reply.
> > > > 
> > > > a) In the English language, one who plonks is a plonker.
> > > > 
> > > > b) The word 'plonker' is to be found in English dictionaries, and is
> > > > appropriate for Julio. See, for instance,
> > > >   <https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/plonker>
> > > > 
> > > >   John
> > > 
> > > The way i see it plonking is an inverted select, like for example the SQL of a newsgroup list "Select ALL ***PLONK*** genius" LoL
> > > 
> > > Here you can replace ***PLONK*** with "deselect or except" genius.
> > > 
> > > The one or thing that perform it is the plonker how ever, the dictionary is wrong it has nothing to do with the attributes of the one that get plonked or the attribute of the one that do the plonking. Plonk is a verb and means deselect.
> > 
> > But one can wonder if
> >  
> > Do while !=genius
> > OR
> > Do until genius is more appropriate?
> > 
> > I always prefered do until for some reason.
> 
> I guess at lowlevel there is no difference, so it is just a semantic choice?

mysql> CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE temp_tb SELECT * FROM orig_tb;
mysql> ALTER TABLE temp_tb DROP col_x;
mysql> SELECT * FROM temp_tb;

I guess in mysql Plonk is replaced by Drop

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35306

FromJonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-25 02:58 -0700
Message-ID<c7de2c83-9027-40db-bce9-8a6e0ab11173@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#35305
Den måndag 25 juni 2018 kl. 11:54:50 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> Den måndag 25 juni 2018 kl. 11:51:26 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> > Den måndag 25 juni 2018 kl. 11:47:10 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> > > Den måndag 25 juni 2018 kl. 11:40:16 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> > > > Den måndag 25 juni 2018 kl. 11:06:44 UTC+2 skrev John G Harris:
> > > > > On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 14:36:53 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> > > > > <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > >John G Harris wrote:
> > > > > >> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:51:03 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> > > > > >> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Attribution line, not attribution novel.  When will you finally get it?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>> Jake Jarvis wrote:
> > > > > >>>> What is that *Plonk* thing?
> > > > > >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk_(Usenet)>
> > > > > >> 
> > > > > >> There is another meaning, one that is more likely in this case. He is
> > > > > >> saying that he is a plonker.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Nonsense.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >How many years are you abusing Usenet now, and still have no clue?
> > > > > 
> > > > > What a silly reply.
> > > > > 
> > > > > a) In the English language, one who plonks is a plonker.
> > > > > 
> > > > > b) The word 'plonker' is to be found in English dictionaries, and is
> > > > > appropriate for Julio. See, for instance,
> > > > >   <https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/plonker>
> > > > > 
> > > > >   John
> > > > 
> > > > The way i see it plonking is an inverted select, like for example the SQL of a newsgroup list "Select ALL ***PLONK*** genius" LoL
> > > > 
> > > > Here you can replace ***PLONK*** with "deselect or except" genius.
> > > > 
> > > > The one or thing that perform it is the plonker how ever, the dictionary is wrong it has nothing to do with the attributes of the one that get plonked or the attribute of the one that do the plonking. Plonk is a verb and means deselect.
> > > 
> > > But one can wonder if
> > >  
> > > Do while !=genius
> > > OR
> > > Do until genius is more appropriate?
> > > 
> > > I always prefered do until for some reason.
> > 
> > I guess at lowlevel there is no difference, so it is just a semantic choice?
> 
> mysql> CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE temp_tb SELECT * FROM orig_tb;
> mysql> ALTER TABLE temp_tb DROP col_x;
> mysql> SELECT * FROM temp_tb;
> 
> I guess in mysql Plonk is replaced by Drop

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaCodgL9cvk

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35310

FromJohn G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid>
Date2018-06-25 19:26 +0100
Message-ID<orc2jd9cmr24iha3fc9supphdv7st9t2qa@4ax.com>
In reply to#35296
On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 14:36:53 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
<PointedEars@web.de> wrote:

>John G Harris wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:51:03 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
>> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
>
>Attribution line, not attribution novel.  When will you finally get it?
  <snip>

I refuse to use a scheme that has a catastrophic design error in it.

  John

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35330

FromThomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Date2018-06-30 19:47 +0200
Message-ID<933999bf-90b9-a619-5d80-d66aedb97e59@PointedEars.de>
In reply to#35310
John G Harris wrote:
> […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote:
>> John G Harris wrote:
>>> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:51:03 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
>>> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
>>
>> Attribution line, not attribution novel.  When will you finally get it?
>   <snip>
> 
> I refuse to use a scheme that has a catastrophic design error in it.

What "design error"?  The error is *yours*.  By posting attribution novels,
*you* are making discussions in which *you* participate *more difficult* to
read, at *no* considerable advantage.

Every one of your postings shows that you do not understand where you are
posting to.


PointedEars
-- 
Sometimes, what you learn is wrong. If those wrong ideas are close to the
root of the knowledge tree you build on a particular subject, pruning the
bad branches can sometimes cause the whole tree to collapse.
  -- Mike Duffy in cljs, <news:Xns9FB6521286DB8invalidcom@94.75.214.39>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35335

FromJohn G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid>
Date2018-07-01 10:56 +0100
Message-ID<189hjdp7evire6smtdj91d531hq2ghd47e@4ax.com>
In reply to#35330
On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 19:47:53 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
<PointedEars@web.de> wrote:

>John G Harris wrote:
>> […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote:
>>> John G Harris wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:51:03 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
>>>> <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Attribution line, not attribution novel.  When will you finally get it?
>>   <snip>
>> 
>> I refuse to use a scheme that has a catastrophic design error in it.
>
>What "design error"?
  <snip>


I have demonstrated it many times. Once again :

Thomas Lahn wrote :
>If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.

Now convince yourself that I am not misquoting you. Obviously I
wouldn't, but you'll refuse to believe that won't you.

  John

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35291

FromAndrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com>
Date2018-06-23 17:19 +1000
Message-ID<paedndC5Kb4QabDGnZ2dnUU7-dnNnZ2d@westnet.com.au>
In reply to#35281
On 22/06/2018 7:23 PM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> On Friday, 22 June 2018 04:38:00 UTC+2, Andrew Poulos  wrote:
> 
>> Thanks for the comprehensive replies.
> 
> Thank you for not thanking me ever: now the gifts are over.  Moron.

I can't really comment on your last sentence but your first sentence is 
untrue.

Andrew Poulos

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35292

FromJulio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name>
Date2018-06-23 00:51 -0700
Message-ID<0e594ed9-f814-4269-8e4a-497d5bdfddbe@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#35291
On Saturday, 23 June 2018 09:19:51 UTC+2, Andrew Poulos  wrote:
> On 22/06/2018 7:23 PM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> > On Friday, 22 June 2018 04:38:00 UTC+2, Andrew Poulos  wrote:
> > 
> >> Thanks for the comprehensive replies.
> > 
> > Thank you for not thanking me ever: now the gifts are over.  Moron.
> 
> I can't really comment on your last sentence but your first sentence is 
> untrue.

No, it isn't, you moron: but you can try and prove me wrong.

You never thank me and if it's happened once in the past by chance you can
stick it up your ass: you are rather very careful to thank others, as can be
seen in this thread, even and on purpose just after I have said how they are
wrong.  And you are certainly free to do so, but do save me the bullshit---

Julio

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35293

FromJohn G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid>
Date2018-06-23 11:27 +0100
Message-ID<m38sid9g6vihph2i66ritt5s42ldrl9utg@4ax.com>
In reply to#35292
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 00:51:09 -0700 (PDT), Julio Di Egidio
<julio@diegidio.name> wrote:

  <snip>
> just after I have said how they are wrong.
  <snip>

He's certainly said we are all wrong. As to 'how' we are wrong all
we've seen so far is information-free gobbledegook.

  John

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35294

FromAndrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com>
Date2018-06-23 20:59 +1000
Message-ID<MeednVR7teWHtbPGnZ2dnUU7-YWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au>
In reply to#35292
On 23/06/2018 5:51 PM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> On Saturday, 23 June 2018 09:19:51 UTC+2, Andrew Poulos  wrote:
>> On 22/06/2018 7:23 PM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>>> On Friday, 22 June 2018 04:38:00 UTC+2, Andrew Poulos  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the comprehensive replies.
>>>
>>> Thank you for not thanking me ever: now the gifts are over.  Moron.
>>
>> I can't really comment on your last sentence but your first sentence is
>> untrue.
> 
> No, it isn't, you moron: but you can try and prove me wrong.
> 
> You never thank me and if it's happened once in the past by chance you can
> stick it up your ass: you are rather very careful to thank others, as can be
> seen in this thread, even and on purpose just after I have said how they are
> wrong.  And you are certainly free to do so, but do save me the bullshit---

I'll save you as much of your own bs as you feel like eating.

Andrew Poulos

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript

csiph-web