Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #30005 > unrolled thread

Just heard about this - WebAssembly

Started bybit-naughty@hotmail.com
First post2016-03-15 12:01 -0700
Last post2016-03-16 00:18 -0700
Articles 7 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript


Contents

  Just heard about this - WebAssembly bit-naughty@hotmail.com - 2016-03-15 12:01 -0700
    Re: Just heard about this - WebAssembly "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-03-15 21:23 -0700
      Re: Just heard about this - WebAssembly "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-03-15 21:27 -0700
      Re: Just heard about this - WebAssembly bit-naughty@hotmail.com - 2016-03-16 00:18 -0700
        Re: Just heard about this - WebAssembly Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-16 10:30 -0300
        Re: Just heard about this - WebAssembly "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-03-16 12:11 -0700
      Re: Just heard about this - WebAssembly bit-naughty@hotmail.com - 2016-03-16 00:18 -0700

#30005 — Just heard about this - WebAssembly

Frombit-naughty@hotmail.com
Date2016-03-15 12:01 -0700
SubjectJust heard about this - WebAssembly
Message-ID<a5bd4dcd-4349-4706-a98b-8e7e62b7f21c@googlegroups.com>
I read about this just now:

https://thestack.com/world/2016/03/15/webassembly-chrome-edge-firefox-angry-bots/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=SocialWarfare


This sounds REALLY COOL! :)

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#30012

From"Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com>
Date2016-03-15 21:23 -0700
Message-ID<a75008b6-461f-4a85-b469-c4c7ac799338@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#30005
On Tuesday, March 15, 2016 at 2:01:24 PM UTC-5, bit-n...@hotmail.com wrote:
> I read about this just now:
> 
> https://thestack.com/world/2016/03/15/webassembly-chrome-edge-firefox-angry-bots/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=SocialWarfare
> 
> 
> This sounds REALLY COOL! :)

There is a ton of news out there on the topic, and it's great news. I've been watching the development of this closely as it's the compilation target for the programming language I'm working on. The benefit for not only games, but compilation in general has been long overdue.

I want to refer you and others to Brendan Eich's talk from last year and this [1][2].

[1] <https://brendaneich.com/2015/06/from-asm-js-to-webassembly/>
[2] <https://www.youtube.com/embed/9UYoKyuFXrM?autoplay=1>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#30013

From"Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com>
Date2016-03-15 21:27 -0700
Message-ID<f35250b1-7ad5-4a01-b4f4-211f0b4acc0e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#30012
On Tuesday, March 15, 2016 at 11:24:05 PM UTC-5, Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 15, 2016 at 2:01:24 PM UTC-5, bit-n...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > I read about this just now:
> > 
> > https://thestack.com/world/2016/03/15/webassembly-chrome-edge-firefox-angry-bots/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=SocialWarfare
> > 
> > 
> > This sounds REALLY COOL! :)
> 
> There is a ton of news out there on the topic, and it's great news. I've been watching the development of this closely as it's the compilation target for the programming language I'm working on. The benefit for not only games, but compilation in general has been long overdue.
> 
> I want to refer you and others to Brendan Eich's talk from last year and this [1][2].
> 
> [1] <https://brendaneich.com/2015/06/from-asm-js-to-webassembly/>
> [2] <https://www.youtube.com/embed/9UYoKyuFXrM?autoplay=1>

Also the Mozilla article:

<https://hacks.mozilla.org/2016/03/a-webassembly-milestone/>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#30014

Frombit-naughty@hotmail.com
Date2016-03-16 00:18 -0700
Message-ID<aec728e5-d373-4bae-a09b-c816a3a9c549@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#30012
On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 9:54:05 AM UTC+5:30, Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:

>as it's the compilation target for the programming language I'm working on. 


Well, since you seem to know about these things, could you please explain that statement? What does the phrase "compilation target for the programming language" mean exactly?

Will it be possible, for example, to write Python or Perl code, and have that execute inside the browser? (provided somebody does all the stuff to *make* that possible, i.e. make the Python interpreter make code for the browser? (I have absolutely no *clue* what I'm talking about :) ) )

Thanks.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#30016

FromAleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com>
Date2016-03-16 10:30 -0300
Message-ID<ncbn0l$sjl$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#30014
On 16/03/16 04:18, bit-naughty@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 9:54:05 AM UTC+5:30, Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:
> 
>> as it's the compilation target for the programming language I'm working on. 
> 
> 
> Well, since you seem to know about these things, could you please explain that statement? What does the phrase "compilation target for the programming language" mean exactly?
> 
> Will it be possible, for example, to write Python or Perl code, and have that execute inside the browser? (provided somebody does all the stuff to *make* that possible, i.e. make the Python interpreter make code for the browser? (I have absolutely no *clue* what I'm talking about :) ) )

Read about LLVM.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#30020

From"Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com>
Date2016-03-16 12:11 -0700
Message-ID<6e5b855c-31d5-4e1b-8c54-5b7b79f171aa@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#30014
On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 2:18:59 AM UTC-5, bit-n...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 9:54:05 AM UTC+5:30, Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:
> 
> >as it's the compilation target for the programming language I'm working on. 
> 
> 
> Well, since you seem to know about these things, could you please explain that statement? What does the phrase "compilation target for the programming language" mean exactly?
> 
> Will it be possible, for example, to write Python or Perl code, and have that execute inside the browser? (provided somebody does all the stuff to *make* that possible, i.e. make the Python interpreter make code for the browser? (I have absolutely no *clue* what I'm talking about :) ) )

Correct. This is drifting off-topic for the group, so I'll point you to an article on this:

<https://hacks.mozilla.org/2015/12/compiling-to-webassembly-its-happening/>

You can also see a list of existing languages targeting asm.js / wasm:

<https://github.com/jashkenas/coffeescript/wiki/List-of-languages-that-compile-to-JS>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#30015

Frombit-naughty@hotmail.com
Date2016-03-16 00:18 -0700
Message-ID<5d9eaf8e-e96d-448c-a5f3-271a01200d3a@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#30012
On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 9:54:05 AM UTC+5:30, Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:

>as it's the compilation target for the programming language I'm working on. 


Well, since you seem to know about these things, could you please explain that statement? What does the phrase "compilation target for the programming language" mean exactly?

Will it be possible, for example, to write Python or Perl code, and have that execute inside the browser? (provided somebody does all the stuff to *make* that possible, i.e. make the Python interpreter make code for the browser? (I have absolutely no *clue* what I'm talking about :) ) )

Thanks.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript


csiph-web