Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #29094 > unrolled thread

Re: The ECMA standard: too harsh a tone?

Started byAleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com>
First post2016-01-01 15:31 -0300
Last post2016-01-01 15:31 -0300
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: The ECMA standard: too harsh a tone? Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-01 15:31 -0300

#29094 — Re: The ECMA standard: too harsh a tone?

FromAleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com>
Date2016-01-01 15:31 -0300
SubjectRe: The ECMA standard: too harsh a tone?
Message-ID<n66ghq$lpt$1@dont-email.me>
On 01/01/16 15:19, Stefan Ram wrote:
>   Usually, the more prominent and powerful a person gets,
>   the more moderate gets his tone.
> 
>   And Douglas Crockford is one of the most prominent authors
>   in the world of JavaScript.
> 
>   About the ECMA-Standard he writes on his page
> 
> www.crockford.com/javascript/javascript.html
> 
>   as follows: »
> 
> Substandard Standard« ... »extremely poor quality« ...
> »ECMA and the TC39 committee should be deeply embarrassed
> 
>   «. I am sorry, but for such a prominent man, isn't this
>   a little bit too harsh a tone?
> 
>   Do you agree with his assessment?
> 
>   He might have written this some years ago referring to
>   a previous version of the standard. But he has not since
>   revoked or clarified it either.
> 

I would say: poor opinion, he should be deeply embarrased.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript


csiph-web