Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #29094 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-01 15:31 -0300 |
| Last post | 2016-01-01 15:31 -0300 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: The ECMA standard: too harsh a tone? Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-01 15:31 -0300
| From | Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-01 15:31 -0300 |
| Subject | Re: The ECMA standard: too harsh a tone? |
| Message-ID | <n66ghq$lpt$1@dont-email.me> |
On 01/01/16 15:19, Stefan Ram wrote: > Usually, the more prominent and powerful a person gets, > the more moderate gets his tone. > > And Douglas Crockford is one of the most prominent authors > in the world of JavaScript. > > About the ECMA-Standard he writes on his page > > www.crockford.com/javascript/javascript.html > > as follows: » > > Substandard Standard« ... »extremely poor quality« ... > »ECMA and the TC39 committee should be deeply embarrassed > > «. I am sorry, but for such a prominent man, isn't this > a little bit too harsh a tone? > > Do you agree with his assessment? > > He might have written this some years ago referring to > a previous version of the standard. But he has not since > revoked or clarified it either. > I would say: poor opinion, he should be deeply embarrased.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript
csiph-web