Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #26461 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Doc O'Leary <droleary@2usenet2014.subsume.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-01-05 03:14 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-01-05 17:00 +0000 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript
Building my blog with client-side JavaScript Doc O'Leary <droleary@2usenet2014.subsume.com> - 2015-01-05 03:14 +0000
Re: Building my blog with client-side JavaScript "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2015-01-04 23:08 -0800
Re: Building my blog with client-side JavaScript danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> - 2015-01-05 13:29 +0100
Re: Building my blog with client-side JavaScript Doc O'Leary <droleary@2usenet2014.subsume.com> - 2015-01-05 17:00 +0000
| From | Doc O'Leary <droleary@2usenet2014.subsume.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-05 03:14 +0000 |
| Subject | Building my blog with client-side JavaScript |
| Message-ID | <m8cvja$uei$1@dont-email.me> |
Here’s a case study that might interest people around here. I got tired of having to maintain overwrought server-side software just to run a simple blog, so I took a stab at a wacky solution: http://www.impossiblystupid.com/node/208/ Good idea or bad idea? Or just impossibly stupid? :-) -- "Also . . . I can kill you with my brain." River Tam, Trash, Firefly
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-04 23:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ac65fa7b-5a1b-40c6-abbf-af325fb0c6e8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #26461 |
On Sunday, January 4, 2015 9:15:22 PM UTC-6, Doc O'Leary wrote: > Here's a case study that might interest people around here. I got tired > of having to maintain overwrought server-side software just to run a > simple blog, so I took a stab at a wacky solution: > > http://www.impossiblystupid.com/node/208/ > > Good idea or bad idea? Or just impossibly stupid? :-) 403 error, so I'm leaning towards the latter...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-05 13:29 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <m8e01i$6fn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #26462 |
Il 05/01/2015 08:08, Michael Haufe (TNO) ha scritto: > > 403 error, so I'm leaning towards the latter... > It works for me. Dan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doc O'Leary <droleary@2usenet2014.subsume.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-05 17:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m8eful$eeq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #26463 |
For your reference, records indicate that danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it> wrote: > Il 05/01/2015 08:08, Michael Haufe (TNO) ha scritto: > > > > > 403 error, so I'm leaning towards the latter... > > > It works for me. > Dan I do have IP blacklists in place for networks that are the source of abuse; Michael needs to contact his ISP and get them to stop taking money from bad actors. Otherwise, everyone should be able to get to everything that Apache offers up on that web host. It’s the most open I’ve left a server, simply because I intentionally have it set up to do nothing but return read-only data. -- "Also . . . I can kill you with my brain." River Tam, Trash, Firefly
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript
csiph-web