Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #23051 > unrolled thread

Re: Help with Security

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Help with Security "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-02-10 13:35 +0100
    Re: Help with Security JJ <duh@nah.meh> - 2014-02-10 23:23 +0700
    Re: Help with Security Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2014-02-10 18:47 -0200
      Re: Help with Security "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-02-10 22:25 +0100
        OT: Javanese (was: Help with Security) JJ <duh@nah.meh> - 2014-02-11 10:23 +0700
          Re: OT: Javanese (was: Help with Security) "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-02-11 16:22 +0100
          Re: OT: Javanese (was: Help with Security) "J. Clarke" <jclarkeusenet@cox.net> - 2014-04-10 15:53 -0400
            Re: OT: Javanese JJ <duh@nah.meh> - 2014-04-11 06:32 +0700

#23051 — Re: Help with Security

Chirag Sharma <chiragsharma.guru99@gmail.com> wrote on 10 feb 2014 in
comp.lang.javascript: 

> I have created a real time java code compiler at
> http://www.guru99.com/try-java-editor.html Although I have checked all
> security aspects ... do you experts see any major flaw that I need to
> care of? 
 
Wrong NG.

Java != Javascript.


-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#23056

On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:35:24 +0100, Evertjan. wrote:
> Wrong NG.
> 
> Java != Javascript.

delete Java; // >8-|

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#23057

Em 10/02/2014 10:35, Evertjan. escreveu:
> Chirag Sharma <chiragsharma.guru99@gmail.com> wrote on 10 feb 2014
> in comp.lang.javascript:
>
>> I have created a real time java code compiler at
>> http://www.guru99.com/try-java-editor.html Although I have checked
>> all security aspects ... do you experts see any major flaw that I
>> need to care of?
>
> Wrong NG.
>
> Java != Javascript.
>
>

Are you trying to irk Thomas Lahn? There is no "Javascript".

-- 
Joao Rodrigues

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#23058

Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> wrote on 10 feb 2014 in 
comp.lang.javascript:

>> Java != Javascript.
>>
> Are you trying to irk Thomas Lahn? There is no "Javascript".

That would make the above equasion even more true.

But for Java people straying on this NG,
the equasion is clear enough.

=============================

Even after making a distinction between the Javanese language
and Sundanese, the Javanese script falls into 5 groups:
Old Javanese, Middle Javanese, New Javanese, Modern Javanese.

There also is a large difference in language when speaking to higher 
and to lower class people, using different words for the same subject,
these words are called "honorifics" and "humilifics" in English.

Some of these words have become ordinary Dutch words.

I love irking Thomas.

-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#23059 — OT: Javanese (was: Help with Security)

On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 22:25:31 +0100, Evertjan. wrote:
> Even after making a distinction between the Javanese language
> and Sundanese, the Javanese script falls into 5 groups:
> Old Javanese, Middle Javanese, New Javanese, Modern Javanese.
> 
> There also is a large difference in language when speaking to higher 
> and to lower class people, using different words for the same subject,
> these words are called "honorifics" and "humilifics" in English.
> 
> Some of these words have become ordinary Dutch words.
> 
> I love irking Thomas.

AFAIK, Javanese characters aren't in any of the Unicode character sets,
right? Cause I always wanted to make the Honocoroko table without using
images. Those characters are similar to Thailand characters.

PS) Do you understand (some?) Javanese language too?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#23066 — Re: OT: Javanese (was: Help with Security)

JJ <duh@nah.meh> wrote on 11 feb 2014 in comp.lang.javascript:

>> I love irking Thomas.
> 
> AFAIK, Javanese characters aren't in any of the Unicode character sets,
> right? Cause I always wanted to make the Honocoroko table without using
> images. Those characters are similar to Thailand characters.

Sorry, don't know about that.
 
> PS) Do you understand (some?) Javanese language too?

No, only some isolated words.

-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#23840 — Re: OT: Javanese (was: Help with Security)

In article <1417110tbdbrg$.15cj2sq1g88d2$.dlg@40tude.net>, duh@nah.meh 
says...
> 
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 22:25:31 +0100, Evertjan. wrote:
> > Even after making a distinction between the Javanese language
> > and Sundanese, the Javanese script falls into 5 groups:
> > Old Javanese, Middle Javanese, New Javanese, Modern Javanese.
> > 
> > There also is a large difference in language when speaking to higher 
> > and to lower class people, using different words for the same subject,
> > these words are called "honorifics" and "humilifics" in English.
> > 
> > Some of these words have become ordinary Dutch words.
> > 
> > I love irking Thomas.
> 
> AFAIK, Javanese characters aren't in any of the Unicode character sets,
> right? Cause I always wanted to make the Honocoroko table without using
> images. Those characters are similar to Thailand characters.
> 
> PS) Do you understand (some?) Javanese language too?

Just an aside while catching up on my reading, but the Javanese glyphs 
were, according to Wiki, added to the standard in 2009 and if included 
in the typeface you are using would be A980-A9DF with 5 reserved points 
toward the upper end of the range.

There is an open source font that incorporates the Javanese glyphs, 
<https://sites.google.com/site/jawaunicode/main-page>.  There may be 
another at <https://sites.google.com/site/jawaunicode/main-page>.  The 
page in a language that I do not understand and that Google translate 
cannot manage so I can't tell you anything useful about it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#23843 — Re: OT: Javanese

On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:53:57 -0400, J. Clarke wrote:
> Just an aside while catching up on my reading, but the Javanese glyphs 
> were, according to Wiki, added to the standard in 2009 and if included 
> in the typeface you are using would be A980-A9DF with 5 reserved points 
> toward the upper end of the range.
> 
> There is an open source font that incorporates the Javanese glyphs, 
> <https://sites.google.com/site/jawaunicode/main-page>.  There may be 
> another at <https://sites.google.com/site/jawaunicode/main-page>.  The 
> page in a language that I do not understand and that Google translate 
> cannot manage so I can't tell you anything useful about it.

Thank you very much for this.
The site also have a pretty good Javanese font and useful links. :)

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript

csiph-web