Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #18862 > unrolled thread

which doctype should be used

Started by"Tony" <tony.johansson@inport.com>
First post2013-03-13 14:17 +0100
Last post2013-03-13 11:30 -0700
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript


Contents

  which doctype should be used "Tony" <tony.johansson@inport.com> - 2013-03-13 14:17 +0100
    Re: which doctype should be used Danny <dann90038@gmail.com> - 2013-03-13 11:30 -0700

#18862 — which doctype should be used

From"Tony" <tony.johansson@inport.com>
Date2013-03-13 14:17 +0100
Subjectwhich doctype should be used
Message-ID<khpu5f$43f$1@dont-email.me>
Is it any recommendation to which doctype is best to use.
Here I have two the first one is HTML 5 and the second is strict xhtml
<!DOCTYPE html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" 
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">

//Tony 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#18872

FromDanny <dann90038@gmail.com>
Date2013-03-13 11:30 -0700
Message-ID<0826205f-ad94-401e-b43a-d3e944b35093@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#18862
To Tony

I'd not consider xhtml as an option for one, use the HTML5 doctype and as far as legacy support for older browsers on features, do a check per feature.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript


csiph-web