Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #40683 > unrolled thread

Monkey gibberish

Started byJonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com>
First post2021-12-20 13:19 -0800
Last post2021-12-23 02:37 +0100
Articles 6 on this page of 26 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript

Contents

  Monkey gibberish Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-12-20 13:19 -0800
    Re: Monkey gibberish luserdroog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2021-12-20 15:00 -0800
      Re: Monkey gibberish Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2021-12-20 23:34 +0000
        Re: Monkey gibberish Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-12-22 12:26 -0800
          Re: Monkey gibberish Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-12-22 12:32 -0800
            Re: Monkey gibberish Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-12-22 12:53 -0800
              Re: Monkey gibberish The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-12-23 12:15 +0000
    Re: Monkey gibberish Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2021-12-21 13:41 +0100
      Re: Monkey gibberish The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-12-21 15:40 +0000
        Re: Monkey gibberish Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2021-12-22 10:30 +0100
          Re: Monkey gibberish The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-12-22 12:05 +0000
      Re: Monkey gibberish Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-12-21 10:00 -0800
        Re: Monkey gibberish Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-12-21 10:21 -0800
          Re: Monkey gibberish Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-12-21 10:26 -0800
            Re: Monkey gibberish Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-12-21 12:24 -0800
              Re: Monkey gibberish Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-12-21 15:06 -0800
              Re: Monkey gibberish Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-12-21 15:08 -0800
                Re: Monkey gibberish Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-12-21 15:08 -0800
                  Re: Monkey gibberish Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2021-12-22 10:33 +0100
        Re: Monkey gibberish Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2021-12-22 10:31 +0100
          Re: Monkey gibberish Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-12-22 03:34 -0800
            Re: Monkey gibberish Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-12-22 03:41 -0800
              Re: Monkey gibberish Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2021-12-22 17:12 +0100
              Re: Monkey gibberish John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-12-22 18:26 +0000
                Re: Monkey gibberish Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-12-22 12:05 -0800
                  Re: Monkey gibberish Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2021-12-23 02:37 +0100

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#40703

FromJonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com>
Date2021-12-22 03:34 -0800
Message-ID<71c96470-a25c-4331-97b7-84b277d063a3n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#40700
onsdag 22 december 2021 kl. 10:31:11 UTC+1 skrev Arno Welzel:
> Jonas Thörnvall:
> > tisdag 21 december 2021 kl. 13:41:21 UTC+1 skrev Arno Welzel: 
> >> Jonas Thörnvall: 
> >>> I have a bit hard to read monkey gibberish, is there a way to 
> >>> explain this to someone who is not fullfledged retarded? 
> >>> 
> >>> .then(res => res.arrayBuffer()) .then(ArrayBuffer => 
> >>> ctx.decodeAudioData(ArrayBuffer)); 
> >>> 
> >>> Specifically .then => Is there another way to write it that may 
> >>> not be gibberish? 
> >> Just because you don't know every detail about JavaScript does not 
> >> mean that this is "gibberish". 
> >> 
> >> See: 
> >> 
> >> <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise> 
> >>
> [...]
> > Yeah precisely those things have no importance for the user and 
> > should not have part of the syntax, its moronic.
> They are not for "users" but for softwar developers.
> -- 
> Arno Welzel 
> https://arnowelzel.de
Oh my bad i thought the programmer used the language to implement ideas.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#40704

FromJonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com>
Date2021-12-22 03:41 -0800
Message-ID<46981a0a-4e59-426e-ab6c-d5c7f0faf471n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#40703
onsdag 22 december 2021 kl. 12:34:29 UTC+1 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> onsdag 22 december 2021 kl. 10:31:11 UTC+1 skrev Arno Welzel: 
> > Jonas Thörnvall: 
> > > tisdag 21 december 2021 kl. 13:41:21 UTC+1 skrev Arno Welzel: 
> > >> Jonas Thörnvall: 
> > >>> I have a bit hard to read monkey gibberish, is there a way to 
> > >>> explain this to someone who is not fullfledged retarded? 
> > >>> 
> > >>> .then(res => res.arrayBuffer()) .then(ArrayBuffer => 
> > >>> ctx.decodeAudioData(ArrayBuffer)); 
> > >>> 
> > >>> Specifically .then => Is there another way to write it that may 
> > >>> not be gibberish? 
> > >> Just because you don't know every detail about JavaScript does not 
> > >> mean that this is "gibberish". 
> > >> 
> > >> See: 
> > >> 
> > >> <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise> 
> > >> 
> > [...] 
> > > Yeah precisely those things have no importance for the user and 
> > > should not have part of the syntax, its moronic. 
> > They are not for "users" but for softwar developers. 
> > -- 
> > Arno Welzel 
> > https://arnowelzel.de
> Oh my bad i thought the programmer used the language to implement ideas.
Oh now i get it its the language programmer that use the language to create customers for his new book or new certificate, it is not a production tool to implement  ideas that is selexplanatory first you should learn an hierarchy of gibberish to be able to use it. 

Frankly audio does not have that many properties.
channels
frequensy resolution
bit resolution
volume

And then you want the streams to have a name so they can be identified
But no, you have to connect the volume to the stream.......
But first you have to create a volume connected to a node.......

They are imbecills at best.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#40706

FromArno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de>
Date2021-12-22 17:12 +0100
Message-ID<j2h13oFb1gaU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#40704
Jonas Thörnvall:

> Oh now i get it its the language programmer that use the language to
> create customers for his new book or new certificate, it is not a
> production tool to implement  ideas that is selexplanatory first you
> should learn an hierarchy of gibberish to be able to use it.

It isn't. I earn my money by developing software - for more than 30
years now. And I don't get paid for complaining about languages but for
providing working software to customers.


-- 
Arno Welzel
https://arnowelzel.de

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#40708

FromJohn Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid>
Date2021-12-22 18:26 +0000
Message-ID<spvqjs$lgm$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#40704
On 22/12/2021 11:41, Jonas Thörnvall wrote:

   <snip>
> Frankly audio does not have that many properties.
> channels
> frequensy resolution
> bit resolution
> volume
> 
> And then you want the streams to have a name so they can be identified
> But no, you have to connect the volume to the stream.......
> But first you have to create a volume connected to a node.......
> 
> They are imbecills at best.

We've told you before, if you copy someone else's code you have to put 
up with the peculiar way they did it. It's not the fault of the 
programming language.

   John

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#40709

FromJonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com>
Date2021-12-22 12:05 -0800
Message-ID<fcc1481a-59cf-4e32-b8bd-ae9446f178adn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#40708
onsdag 22 december 2021 kl. 19:26:11 UTC+1 skrev John Harris:
> On 22/12/2021 11:41, Jonas Thörnvall wrote: 
> 
> <snip>
> > Frankly audio does not have that many properties. 
> > channels 
> > frequensy resolution 
> > bit resolution 
> > volume 
> > 
> > And then you want the streams to have a name so they can be identified 
> > But no, you have to connect the volume to the stream....... 
> > But first you have to create a volume connected to a node....... 
> > 
> > They are imbecills at best.
> We've told you before, if you copy someone else's code you have to put 
> up with the peculiar way they did it. It's not the fault of the 
> programming language. 
> 
> John
Unfortunately i think that gainNode object is mandatory if you want to change volume of stream....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#40713

FromArno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de>
Date2021-12-23 02:37 +0100
Message-ID<j2i26uFh4qdU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#40709
Jonas Thörnvall:

> onsdag 22 december 2021 kl. 19:26:11 UTC+1 skrev John Harris:
>> On 22/12/2021 11:41, Jonas Thörnvall wrote:
>> 
>> <snip>
>>> Frankly audio does not have that many properties. channels 
>>> frequensy resolution bit resolution volume
>>> 
>>> And then you want the streams to have a name so they can be
>>> identified But no, you have to connect the volume to the
>>> stream....... But first you have to create a volume connected to
>>> a node.......
>>> 
>>> They are imbecills at best.
>> We've told you before, if you copy someone else's code you have to
>> put up with the peculiar way they did it. It's not the fault of the
>>  programming language.
>> 
>> John
> Unfortunately i think that gainNode object is mandatory if you want
> to change volume of stream....

Using this does not neet "monkey gibberish":

<https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/BaseAudioContext/createGain#example>


-- 
Arno Welzel
https://arnowelzel.de

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript

csiph-web