Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #39119 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Groo Vee <groovee@cyberdude.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-11-06 23:33 -0800 |
| Last post | 2020-11-08 17:01 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript
What do you guys think of this? The PayTM App Store Groo Vee <groovee@cyberdude.com> - 2020-11-06 23:33 -0800
Re: What do you guys think of this? The PayTM App Store JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2020-11-07 23:08 +0700
Re: What do you guys think of this? The PayTM App Store "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2020-11-07 08:54 -0800
Re: What do you guys think of this? The PayTM App Store luserdroog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2020-11-08 13:26 -0800
Re: What do you guys think of this? The PayTM App Store "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2020-11-08 13:37 -0800
Re: What do you guys think of this? The PayTM App Store Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2020-11-08 17:01 +0100
| From | Groo Vee <groovee@cyberdude.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-06 23:33 -0800 |
| Subject | What do you guys think of this? The PayTM App Store |
| Message-ID | <d56dc843-20ca-402c-8314-d1e55e82b378n@googlegroups.com> |
Tiny little PayTM decided to do something about Google's dominance on the smartphone: https://business.paytm.com/miniapps What do you guys think of this? Anything you'd be interested to join?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-07 23:08 +0700 |
| Message-ID | <17it9b56jdf7b.1tpyc4oa1h1er$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #39119 |
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 23:33:39 -0800 (PST), Groo Vee wrote: > Tiny little PayTM decided to do something about Google's dominance on the > smartphone: > > https://business.paytm.com/miniapps > > What do you guys think of this? All I see is a name of something unclear. > Anything you'd be interested to join? A name alone isn't interresting enough considering that it can mean anything. Moreover, post like this is off topic in this newsgroup.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-07 08:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4efdc401-90e8-4562-baf4-fe775c334a7en@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #39119 |
On Saturday, November 7, 2020 at 1:33:49 AM UTC-6, Groo Vee wrote: > Tiny little PayTM decided to do something about Google's dominance on the smartphone: > > https://business.paytm.com/miniapps > > > What do you guys think of this? Anything you'd be interested to join? This is off topic. What would have been closer to on-topic is PWAs. There are a few of them. PWAs can be added to existing stores while remaining independent web pages. Talking about PWAs in the abstract is also off-topic.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | luserdroog <luser.droog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-08 13:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6833fa2c-79d1-4d98-b4d5-0885da89be57o@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #39121 |
On Saturday, November 7, 2020 at 10:54:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote: > On Saturday, November 7, 2020 at 1:33:49 AM UTC-6, Groo Vee wrote: > > Tiny little PayTM decided to do something about Google's dominance on the smartphone: > > > > https://business.paytm.com/miniapps > > > > > > What do you guys think of this? Anything you'd be interested to join? > > This is off topic. What would have been closer to on-topic is PWAs. There are a few of them. PWAs can be added to existing stores while remaining independent web pages. > > Talking about PWAs in the abstract is also off-topic. I'm interested in learning more. What part of PWAs would be on-topic?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-08 13:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8fc5934c-3905-403a-b4a0-dad2273bf481n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #39123 |
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 3:26:50 PM UTC-6, luser...@gmail.com wrote: > > Talking about PWAs in the abstract is also off-topic. > I'm interested in learning more. What part of PWAs would be on-topic? The JavaScript portions of course and the related APIs. MDN has a detailed guide to difference aspects: <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Progressive_web_apps> Once your PWA works and can be installed from a website you can then add to the popular app stores. The App Stores are still unfriendly (or hostile) but here is a guide: <https://www.simicart.com/blog/pwa-app-stores/> Microsoft, believe it or not, is more friendly: <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/progressive-web-apps-edgehtml/microsoft-store>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-08 17:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <i0qj38Fh020U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #39119 |
Groo Vee: > Tiny little PayTM decided to do something about Google's dominance on the smartphone: > > https://business.paytm.com/miniapps What does this have to do with JavaScript? > What do you guys think of this? Anything you'd be interested to join? No. -- Arno Welzel https://arnowelzel.de
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript
csiph-web