Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #75495 > unrolled thread

Download Film Single 480p Tv

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript

Contents

  Download Film Single 480p Tv Kam Bergmann <kambergmann@gmail.com> - 2023-12-26 02:40 -0800

#75495 — Download Film Single 480p Tv

Sorry if this is a common question, it just doesn't seem right to me based off all the 1080p movies on my friend's friend's account. None of those videos are in 480p so I hope I'm missing something. I've been using makemkv to rip, haven't tried handbrake because, well, quality loss vs cheap external drive is pretty easy decision for me.


If somehow I'm doing everything "right" and there's no way to take a Star Wars IV DVD in SD and upload it in a quality that lets me see C3PO's face lost in the desert, then I guess I don't see the point of constantly having a computer running, re-buying all my dvds in blu-ray, going through the trouble of ripping them, taking up TBs of disk space, and then watching them in 480p when I could simply walk to a bluray player, put any disk in, and then press play and get way better quality with way less work. Maybe that's just what I should do? I'm not offended to receive that answer, I just figure I must be doing something wrong or Plex wouldn't be a thing.



Download Film Single 480p Tv

Download File https://tincte-ptincro.blogspot.com/?goaf=2wWmwV 






Well you CAN make rough assumptions. For a live action film a bit-rate of 3-8 Mbit/s is very advisable at 1080p. At 3Mbit/s you will very likely have noticable artifacts, thats usually an advisable bitrate for 720p video.A file at SD resolution 480p/567p that is around 4GB in size you probably deal with a DVD that wasn't trans-coded for archiving.


If they do, the only possibly explanation are very strange bitrates, which might cause this. Even so, I would go with the 1080p file, since a high bitrate doesn't really result in better quality for 480p videos, and 1080p videos still look relatively good with low bitrates. (Also, you could literally count the pixels of the 480p video on a screen that big)


That's where I stopped reading. ALL MOVIES PRIOR TO 2000 where shot on film at much lower resolution. And yes, I (and many other people) love watching that "mushy stuff" - cause it is CONTENT THAT COUNTS, not resolution.


Sure, that was the case when comparing 1080p and its predecessor. Nowadays no one except the big budget flicks are shooting film, so your options are either continue shooting in 2K or adopting 4K if you have the means (or 5K or 6K if you have access to that, though not the audience for this piece).


1) to frame grab you'd want to film specifically with the intention of frame grabbing. This would mean a high shutter speed that would freeze your race car but which would potentially give very handicam looking video footage.






Anyhow, I read page 1; found some errors:

1) Blu-Ray, not Blue Ray.

2) The first two duck images images are not even remotely to scale. 480p is demonstrated by an image 90 pixels high, while the 720p image is 240 pixels high. 480/90 = 5.3, and 720/240 = 3. Stopped reading there.


It's to demonstrate the relative amount of detail you'd see. The images could've been resized to the same size, but then the 480p image would be a pile of mush (not too far from reality on today's TVs though...).


4K is something we legitimately need. For decades...we've been trapped in a low-resolution world. 120 dpi monitors and 1080 line (or less) TVs. All of that is inferior to what film was. With 4K video and HiDPI displays, we are finally getting back what we lost for many years, finally getting back to real film quality. It seems ludicrous to argue that we should refuse this return to traditional visual lquality.


That is ridiculous. 4K in and of itself has nothing to do with making your image look like a cartoon. It means you have left the TV's "soap opera" motion smoothing setting on. If you get the TV away from the "in-store demo mode" settings and set your TV properly, it can produce a film-like image.


You see evidence of this in footage of airplanes and helicopters where the propellers are too "strobed" with no prop blur. It is a symptom of the video shutter speed being much too high. Some productions have to attach ND filters because the video shutter speed is too high for film-like motion blur.


Lomography's LomoChrome '92 is designed to mimic the look of classic drugstore film that used to fill family photo albums. As we discovered, to shoot with it is to embrace the unexpected, from strange color shifts to odd textures and oversized grain.


Kodak's Super 8 Camera is a hybrid of old and new: it shoots movies using Super 8 motion picture film but incorporates digital elements like a flip-out LCD screen and audio capture. Eight years after we first saw the camera at CES 2016, Kodak is finally bringing it to market.

 0aad45d008

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript

csiph-web