Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #37178 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-09-08 23:22 -0700 |
| Last post | 2019-09-10 14:05 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 55 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript
Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-08 23:22 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-09 10:15 +0200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-09 04:18 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-09 06:40 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-09 06:42 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-09 06:48 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-09-09 20:16 +0200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-09 11:35 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-09 11:44 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-09 12:00 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-09-10 17:35 +0200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-10 09:24 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-10 18:15 +0100
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-09-11 00:58 +0200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-10 23:18 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-09-11 10:17 +0200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-10 23:25 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Flng Fck <nothanks@invalid.invalid> - 2019-09-11 09:19 +0200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-11 00:32 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-11 00:36 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-11 00:39 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-09-11 10:20 +0200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-11 02:20 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-09-12 10:29 +0200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-12 11:53 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2019-09-12 22:33 +0200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-12 14:42 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-12 21:44 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Flng Fck <nothanks@invalid.invalid> - 2019-09-13 11:15 +0200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-13 11:13 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-14 06:35 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-09-13 14:42 +0200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. HusTler@f122.n1.z21.fsxnet (HusTler) - 2019-09-13 09:28 +1200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-14 11:20 +0100
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-09-14 22:40 +0200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-09-15 03:15 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-09-15 03:22 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-15 11:33 +0100
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-09-15 04:17 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-15 05:51 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-15 19:19 +0100
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-09-15 23:52 +0200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-09-16 02:38 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-09-16 11:55 +0200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-09-16 03:03 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-09-16 13:49 +0200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. dr.j.r.stockton@gmail.com - 2019-09-15 06:40 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Maik Koenig <usenetspam@maikkoenig.de> - 2019-09-09 23:20 +0200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-09 20:43 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-09 20:46 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-09-11 00:52 +0200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-10 15:57 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-09-11 10:15 +0200
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2019-09-10 12:43 -0700
Re: Breakdown a HTML file into sub textblocks. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-10 14:05 -0700
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
| From | Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-11 00:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8ae0a898-6feb-459f-a250-15a06c336a7a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #37213 |
Den onsdag 11 september 2019 kl. 09:19:57 UTC+2 skrev Flng Fck: > Il 11/09/2019 08:25, Jonas Thörnvall ha scritto: > > But i think my naming convention was rather smart because now the new > > "subelement" have the start tag <HTML SUB> instead of <HTML> and we > > know we do not allow subs within subs so no nesting can occur. > > > HTML SUB can not be a tag, HTMLSUB could be but not HTML SUB. It's so > easy to see, and so similar to the IQ tests, that I can't believe you > have an IQ of 187 A syntax AI would not help me with the logistics and layout of program, just answers to howto compose statements from the functional base of language. Sooner or later some INTJ person will put there thought to it and there will be one, or maybe some poor ENTP unaware about him programming his own replacement LoL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-11 10:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <gtrp25Fn7keU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #37210 |
On 11.09.19 08:25, Jonas Thörnvall wrote: > Den onsdag 11 september 2019 kl. 00:59:01 UTC+2 skrev Arno Welzel: >> Jonas Thörnvall: >> >>> To not get any problamss i would just implement it to get HTML >>> files from same domain and folder. And only allow the new TAG >>> from originally loaded URL page, so nesting loops can not occur. >>> >>> <HTML SUB="oohILikeIt.html">This is not visible only a comment >>> about what is loaded</HTML SUB> >> >> You should first learn the basics of HTML. This construct is utter >> nonsense. >> >> 1) The thing you describe is an "element" not a "tag". >> >> 2) An HTML element usually has an opening tag <name> and a closing >> tag </name>, even though there are elements which don't require a >> closing tag. >> >> 3) If there are attributes like "sub", they will *not* be repeated >> in the closing tag. >> >> For example - this is corrent: >> >> <p class="something"> ..... </p> >> >> but this *not*: >> >> <p class="something"> ... </p class> >> >>> That is what i would have done from start. >> >> You should first learn how HTML *really* works and how to name >> things correctly. >> >> >> -- Arno Welzel https://arnowelzel.de > > But of course you are right. <HTML SUB=""> </HTML> would be the > correct formatted tags. > > But i think my naming convention was rather smart because now the new > "subelement" have the start tag <HTML SUB> instead of <HTML> and we > know we do not allow subs within subs so no nesting can occur. You still don't get it! Learn at least the basics properly! The element in your example is "HTML" and *not* "HTML SUB". The elements starts with the opening tag "<HTML>" and in your example it has an *attribute* named "SUB". -- Arno Welzel https://arnowelzel.de
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-11 02:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <764385ef-6938-4201-b1d5-6f532bcee1a8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #37222 |
Den onsdag 11 september 2019 kl. 10:20:27 UTC+2 skrev Arno Welzel: > On 11.09.19 08:25, Jonas Thörnvall wrote: > > > Den onsdag 11 september 2019 kl. 00:59:01 UTC+2 skrev Arno Welzel: > >> Jonas Thörnvall: > >> > >>> To not get any problamss i would just implement it to get HTML > >>> files from same domain and folder. And only allow the new TAG > >>> from originally loaded URL page, so nesting loops can not occur. > >>> > >>> <HTML SUB="oohILikeIt.html">This is not visible only a comment > >>> about what is loaded</HTML SUB> > >> > >> You should first learn the basics of HTML. This construct is utter > >> nonsense. > >> > >> 1) The thing you describe is an "element" not a "tag". > >> > >> 2) An HTML element usually has an opening tag <name> and a closing > >> tag </name>, even though there are elements which don't require a > >> closing tag. > >> > >> 3) If there are attributes like "sub", they will *not* be repeated > >> in the closing tag. > >> > >> For example - this is corrent: > >> > >> <p class="something"> ..... </p> > >> > >> but this *not*: > >> > >> <p class="something"> ... </p class> > >> > >>> That is what i would have done from start. > >> > >> You should first learn how HTML *really* works and how to name > >> things correctly. > >> > >> > >> -- Arno Welzel https://arnowelzel.de > > > > But of course you are right. <HTML SUB=""> </HTML> would be the > > correct formatted tags. > > > > But i think my naming convention was rather smart because now the new > > "subelement" have the start tag <HTML SUB> instead of <HTML> and we > > know we do not allow subs within subs so no nesting can occur. > > You still don't get it! > > Learn at least the basics properly! The element in your example is > "HTML" and *not* "HTML SUB". > > The elements starts with the opening tag "<HTML>" and in your example it > has an *attribute* named "SUB". > > > > -- > Arno Welzel > https://arnowelzel.de Yes i get you are anal prudent and nitpicking, not that smart but enjoy repeating things endlessly. I however do not.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-12 10:29 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <gtudvtF9miuU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #37226 |
On 11.09.19 11:20, Jonas Thörnvall wrote: > Den onsdag 11 september 2019 kl. 10:20:27 UTC+2 skrev Arno Welzel: >> On 11.09.19 08:25, Jonas Thörnvall wrote: [...] >>> But of course you are right. <HTML SUB=""> </HTML> would be the >>> correct formatted tags. >>> >>> But i think my naming convention was rather smart because now the >>> new "subelement" have the start tag <HTML SUB> instead of <HTML> >>> and we know we do not allow subs within subs so no nesting can >>> occur. >> >> You still don't get it! >> >> Learn at least the basics properly! The element in your example is >> "HTML" and *not* "HTML SUB". >> >> The elements starts with the opening tag "<HTML>" and in your >> example it has an *attribute* named "SUB". [...] > Yes i get you are anal prudent and nitpicking, not that smart but > enjoy repeating things endlessly. I however do not. If you call it "anal prudent and nitpicking" to use technical terms properly then you are just ignorant and stupid. If you are so smart, then stop asking here and just implement your stuff! -- Arno Welzel https://arnowelzel.de
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-12 11:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2bad4dd1-a4b4-4c1f-a72d-ed9443942822@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #37235 |
Den torsdag 12 september 2019 kl. 10:29:55 UTC+2 skrev Arno Welzel: > On 11.09.19 11:20, Jonas Thörnvall wrote: > > > Den onsdag 11 september 2019 kl. 10:20:27 UTC+2 skrev Arno Welzel: > >> On 11.09.19 08:25, Jonas Thörnvall wrote: > [...] > >>> But of course you are right. <HTML SUB=""> </HTML> would be the > >>> correct formatted tags. > >>> > >>> But i think my naming convention was rather smart because now the > >>> new "subelement" have the start tag <HTML SUB> instead of <HTML> > >>> and we know we do not allow subs within subs so no nesting can > >>> occur. > >> > >> You still don't get it! > >> > >> Learn at least the basics properly! The element in your example is > >> "HTML" and *not* "HTML SUB". > >> > >> The elements starts with the opening tag "<HTML>" and in your > >> example it has an *attribute* named "SUB". > [...] > > Yes i get you are anal prudent and nitpicking, not that smart but > > enjoy repeating things endlessly. I however do not. > > If you call it "anal prudent and nitpicking" to use technical terms > properly then you are just ignorant and stupid. If you are so smart, > then stop asking here and just implement your stuff! > > > -- > Arno Welzel > https://arnowelzel.de You see somtimes the hurdle is finding the information, not implementing ideas. I know what i want to do, the hard part is find out how "Javascript" wants me to do it. I spend 200% of the time of that implementing it is a breeze, once you decrypted what javascript wants you to do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-12 22:33 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <XnsAAC8E58EE208Beejj99@194.109.6.166> |
| In reply to | #37236 |
<jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> wrote on 12 Sep 2019 in comp.lang.javascript: > You see somtimes the hurdle is finding the information, not implementing > ideas. > I know what i want to do, the hard part is find out how > "Javascript" wants me to do it. Personifying it as your personal bogeyman in the sky? That usually is a coping mechanism for low IQ, can on occasion be very disasterous. > I spend 200% of the time of that Wow, then you must have a IQ of 50, as "normal" people only need 100%. > implementing it is a breeze, once you decrypted what javascript wants > you to do. Wat, again? Try praying to your bogeyman. -- Evertjan. The Netherlands. (Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-12 14:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <835235d6-2087-43da-97a7-481e53c1aafa@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #37237 |
On Thursday, September 12, 2019 at 10:34:35 PM UTC+2, Evertjan. wrote: > <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> wrote on 12 > Sep 2019 in comp.lang.javascript: > > > You see somtimes the hurdle is finding the information, not implementing > > ideas. > > > I know what i want to do, the hard part is find out how > > "Javascript" wants me to do it. > > Personifying it as your personal bogeyman in the sky? > > That usually is a coping mechanism for low IQ, > can on occasion be very disasterous. > > > I spend 200% of the time of that > > Wow, then you must have a IQ of 50, > as "normal" people only need 100%. > > > implementing it is a breeze, once you decrypted what javascript wants > > you to do. > > Wat, again? > > Try praying to your bogeyman. > > > -- > Evertjan. > The Netherlands. > (Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress) Please you anal retentive low IQ monkey first qualify into mega society then come with your lame dance moves. You know that society that only let in 1 in a 1000 000..... Yeah that is right i am one of the 8000 smartest people on this earth, well according to mega society personally i doubt it there is alot of smart people who never do an IQ test. Nothing i would advice for you Evert Jan the prestige loss for a anal retentive ENTP who considered himself the pinnacle of perfection by reading and learning manuals by heart can be rather drastic experience LoL Nah you keep digging Evert Jan it was what you were meant to do. Dig and study what you got in that showel, that your area of expertise LoL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-12 21:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <72697c99-41c8-42fc-a616-8b559306306a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #37238 |
Den torsdag 12 september 2019 kl. 23:42:45 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall: > On Thursday, September 12, 2019 at 10:34:35 PM UTC+2, Evertjan. wrote: > > <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> wrote on 12 > > Sep 2019 in comp.lang.javascript: > > > > > You see somtimes the hurdle is finding the information, not implementing > > > ideas. > > > > > I know what i want to do, the hard part is find out how > > > "Javascript" wants me to do it. > > > > Personifying it as your personal bogeyman in the sky? > > > > That usually is a coping mechanism for low IQ, > > can on occasion be very disasterous. > > > > > I spend 200% of the time of that > > > > Wow, then you must have a IQ of 50, > > as "normal" people only need 100%. > > > > > implementing it is a breeze, once you decrypted what javascript wants > > > you to do. > > > > Wat, again? > > > > Try praying to your bogeyman. > > > > > > -- > > Evertjan. > > The Netherlands. > > (Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress) > > Please you anal retentive low IQ monkey first qualify into mega society then come with your lame dance moves. You know that society that only let in 1 in a 1000 000..... > > Yeah that is right i am one of the 8000 smartest people on this earth, well according to mega society personally i doubt it there is alot of smart people who never do an IQ test. > > Nothing i would advice for you Evert Jan the prestige loss for a anal retentive ENTP who considered himself the pinnacle of perfection by reading and learning manuals by heart can be rather drastic experience LoL > > Nah you keep digging Evert Jan it was what you were meant to do. Dig and study what you got in that showel, that your area of expertise LoL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjLi2Tr0pHQ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Flng Fck <nothanks@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-13 11:15 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qlfmmu$1lc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #37238 |
Il 12/09/2019 23:42, Jonas Thörnvall ha scritto: > Yeah that is right i am one of the 8000 smartest people on this earth, > well according to mega society personally i doubt it there is alot of > smart people who never do an IQ test. From Wikipedia "The Mega Society accepts members on the basis of untimed, unsupervised IQ tests", that means that all that story is plain BS, including the "1 in a million". The fact that you still write english as a retarded 8th grader tells a lot in that way
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-13 11:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8122c432-47a4-4f38-a3c1-d19610241d64@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #37240 |
Den fredag 13 september 2019 kl. 11:15:17 UTC+2 skrev Flng Fck: > Il 12/09/2019 23:42, Jonas Thörnvall ha scritto: > > > Yeah that is right i am one of the 8000 smartest people on this earth, > > well according to mega society personally i doubt it there is alot of > > smart people who never do an IQ test. > > > From Wikipedia "The Mega Society accepts members on the basis of > untimed, unsupervised IQ tests", that means that all that story is plain > BS, including the "1 in a million". The fact that you still write > english as a retarded 8th grader tells a lot in that way Yeah you are right the test was a breeze for me so i guess you could be right, you probably should check it out. I am a bit hesitant about Evert Jan, it may hur his pride LoL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-14 06:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c4787cba-235d-4887-a2e5-e4d4e10fa798@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #37240 |
On Friday, September 13, 2019 at 11:15:17 AM UTC+2, Flng Fck wrote: > Il 12/09/2019 23:42, Jonas Thörnvall ha scritto: > > > Yeah that is right i am one of the 8000 smartest people on this earth, > > well according to mega society personally i doubt it there is alot of > > smart people who never do an IQ test. > > > From Wikipedia "The Mega Society accepts members on the basis of > untimed, unsupervised IQ tests", that means that all that story is plain > BS, including the "1 in a million". The fact that you still write > english as a retarded 8th grader tells a lot in that way Still a moron LoL http://theomegasociety.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-13 14:42 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <gu1h5aFtj4uU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #37238 |
On 12.09.19 23:42, Jonas Thörnvall wrote: [...] > Yeah that is right i am one of the 8000 smartest people on this > earth, well according to mega society personally i doubt it there is > alot of smart people who never do an IQ test. Please just stop this! All of you here! This newsgroup is for discussing about JavaScript and not "how to bully everbody else as aggressive as possible"! -- Arno Welzel https://arnowelzel.de
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HusTler@f122.n1.z21.fsxnet (HusTler) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-13 09:28 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <4262234994@f122.n1.z21.fsxnet> |
| In reply to | #37241 |
AW> Please just stop this! All of you here! AW> AW> This newsgroup is for discussing about JavaScript and not "how to bully AW> everbody else as aggressive as possible"! AW> Probably a spill over from the Fidonet Coup.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-14 11:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <dmfpnet69j58m7ef40rhfiab655arf118l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #37241 |
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:42:17 +0200, Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> wrote: <snip> >This newsgroup is for discussing about JavaScript <snip> It's a bit more than that, actually. It's for discussing any language that has any edition of ECMAScript as its core language, and any of the earlier languages that were standardised under the ECMAScript label, and also any reasonable suggestions for changes to these languages. Of course, the most discussed are languages using the latest ECMAScript plus the latest DOM, many of which, rightly or wrongly, are named "JavaScript". John
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-14 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <gu51i2FlfmeU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #37244 |
John G Harris: > On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:42:17 +0200, Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> > wrote: > > <snip> >> This newsgroup is for discussing about JavaScript > <snip> > > It's a bit more than that, actually. It's for discussing any language > that has any edition of ECMAScript as its core language, and any of > the earlier languages that were standardised under the ECMAScript > label, and also any reasonable suggestions for changes to these > languages. > > Of course, the most discussed are languages using the latest > ECMAScript plus the latest DOM, many of which, rightly or wrongly, are > named "JavaScript". Thanks for this addition. Of course you're right. -- Arno Welzel https://arnowelzel.de
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-15 03:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <88e61332-77cd-4836-8725-dd73a5efa891@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #37246 |
On Saturday, 14 September 2019 22:40:41 UTC+2, Arno Welzel wrote: > John G Harris: > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:42:17 +0200, Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> > > wrote: > > > > <snip> > >> This newsgroup is for discussing about JavaScript > > <snip> > > > > It's a bit more than that, actually. It's for discussing any language > > that has any edition of ECMAScript as its core language, and any of > > the earlier languages that were standardised under the ECMAScript > > label, and also any reasonable suggestions for changes to these > > languages. > > > > Of course, the most discussed are languages using the latest > > ECMAScript plus the latest DOM, many of which, rightly or wrongly, are > > named "JavaScript". > > Thanks for this addition. Of course you're right. While of course the DOM is NOT part of JS and has NEVER been on topic for this group. What a parade of fucking useless self-deluded morons... *Plonk* Julio
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-15 03:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f3e1ae5c-3423-413b-8e77-417e048e6020@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #37247 |
On Sunday, 15 September 2019 12:15:41 UTC+2, Julio Di Egidio wrote: > On Saturday, 14 September 2019 22:40:41 UTC+2, Arno Welzel wrote: > > John G Harris: > > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:42:17 +0200, Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> > > > wrote: > > > > > > <snip> > > >> This newsgroup is for discussing about JavaScript > > > <snip> > > > > > > It's a bit more than that, actually. It's for discussing any language > > > that has any edition of ECMAScript as its core language, and any of > > > the earlier languages that were standardised under the ECMAScript > > > label, and also any reasonable suggestions for changes to these > > > languages. > > > > > > Of course, the most discussed are languages using the latest > > > ECMAScript plus the latest DOM, many of which, rightly or wrongly, are > > > named "JavaScript". > > > > Thanks for this addition. Of course you're right. > > While of course the DOM is NOT part of JS and has NEVER been on topic for > this group. P.S. And nobody but a truly incompetent retard and/or resident troll would call the DOM "JavaScript"... > What a parade of fucking useless self-deluded morons... What a parade of suckers. *Plonk* Julio
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-15 11:33 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ip4snepppfu64pfe5ifbh0siqhcn2tnhct@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #37247 |
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 03:15:35 -0700 (PDT), Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> wrote: >On Saturday, 14 September 2019 22:40:41 UTC+2, Arno Welzel wrote: >> John G Harris: >> > On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:42:17 +0200, Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> >> > wrote: >> > >> > <snip> >> >> This newsgroup is for discussing about JavaScript >> > <snip> >> > >> > It's a bit more than that, actually. It's for discussing any language >> > that has any edition of ECMAScript as its core language, and any of >> > the earlier languages that were standardised under the ECMAScript >> > label, and also any reasonable suggestions for changes to these >> > languages. >> > >> > Of course, the most discussed are languages using the latest >> > ECMAScript plus the latest DOM, many of which, rightly or wrongly, are >> > named "JavaScript". >> >> Thanks for this addition. Of course you're right. > >While of course the DOM is NOT part of JS and has NEVER been on topic for >this group. Wake up at the back! I didn't say that the DOM specification itself was on topic. I said that languages that provide access to the DOM and use ECMAScript to do so are on topic. Nor for that matter has anyone ever said what exactly a language must do to be named "JavaScript" or "JS". >What a parade of fucking useless self-deluded morons... > >*Plonk* Plinkity plonk, it must be Julio >Julio John
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-15 04:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <87622a64-6c13-4279-9b4c-1b5b1dfce4a4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #37249 |
On Sunday, 15 September 2019 12:33:56 UTC+2, John G Harris wrote: > On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 03:15:35 -0700 (PDT), Julio Di Egidio wrote: > >On Saturday, 14 September 2019 22:40:41 UTC+2, Arno Welzel wrote: > >> John G Harris: > >> > On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:42:17 +0200, Arno Welzel wrote: > >> > > >> > <snip> > >> >> This newsgroup is for discussing about JavaScript > >> > <snip> > >> > > >> > It's a bit more than that, actually. It's for discussing any language > >> > that has any edition of ECMAScript as its core language, and any of > >> > the earlier languages that were standardised under the ECMAScript > >> > label, and also any reasonable suggestions for changes to these > >> > languages. > >> > > >> > Of course, the most discussed are languages using the latest > >> > ECMAScript plus the latest DOM, many of which, rightly or wrongly, are > >> > named "JavaScript". > >> > >> Thanks for this addition. Of course you're right. > > > >While of course the DOM is NOT part of JS and has NEVER been on topic for > >this group. > > Wake up at the back! Idiot, try and learn something for a change. > I didn't say that the DOM specification itself was on topic. I said > that languages that provide access to the DOM and use ECMAScript to do > so are on topic. Still utter nonsense: the DOM is *totally irrelevant* to JS, and there is no such thing as "languages that use ECMAScript to do so", it's either ECMAScript or it isn't, ECMAScript *is* the language. > Nor for that matter has anyone ever said what exactly a language must > do to be named "JavaScript" or "JS". Do you often make of your ignorance a universal law? FYI, JS and ECMAScript are *synonyms*. HTH, Julio
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-15 05:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <470494b5-be7b-497c-8b3e-2f28de76c2c0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #37250 |
Den söndag 15 september 2019 kl. 13:17:20 UTC+2 skrev Julio Di Egidio: > On Sunday, 15 September 2019 12:33:56 UTC+2, John G Harris wrote: > > On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 03:15:35 -0700 (PDT), Julio Di Egidio wrote: > > >On Saturday, 14 September 2019 22:40:41 UTC+2, Arno Welzel wrote: > > >> John G Harris: > > >> > On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:42:17 +0200, Arno Welzel wrote: > > >> > > > >> > <snip> > > >> >> This newsgroup is for discussing about JavaScript > > >> > <snip> > > >> > > > >> > It's a bit more than that, actually. It's for discussing any language > > >> > that has any edition of ECMAScript as its core language, and any of > > >> > the earlier languages that were standardised under the ECMAScript > > >> > label, and also any reasonable suggestions for changes to these > > >> > languages. > > >> > > > >> > Of course, the most discussed are languages using the latest > > >> > ECMAScript plus the latest DOM, many of which, rightly or wrongly, are > > >> > named "JavaScript". > > >> > > >> Thanks for this addition. Of course you're right. > > > > > >While of course the DOM is NOT part of JS and has NEVER been on topic for > > >this group. > > > > Wake up at the back! > > Idiot, try and learn something for a change. > > > I didn't say that the DOM specification itself was on topic. I said > > that languages that provide access to the DOM and use ECMAScript to do > > so are on topic. > > Still utter nonsense: the DOM is *totally irrelevant* to JS, and there is no > such thing as "languages that use ECMAScript to do so", it's either ECMAScript > or it isn't, ECMAScript *is* the language. > > > Nor for that matter has anyone ever said what exactly a language must > > do to be named "JavaScript" or "JS". > > Do you often make of your ignorance a universal law? FYI, JS and ECMAScript > are *synonyms*. > > HTH, > > Julio Can't say i know what the DOM actually is but i guess it is the documentstructure of HTML, and the input output interface via. As such i see it relevant to Javascript because if it is relevant for the scope of variables and functions you need to know howto use the DOM to access those functions and variables right? But i really never got the point behind the DOM when all scripts and pages is in the same domain. Maybe we could talk about that, what is the use of the DOM document structure, "except for the obvious using frames, reload pages dynamically". Why are not all variables functions readely avialable just by been read in by reference and read in document in domain? I guess i ask what is the purpose of the DOM structure "if we forget dynamical loading of HTML pages using for a second". I feel i miss something vital here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript
csiph-web