Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #20180 > unrolled thread

Alignment of three tables

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript

Contents

  Alignment of three tables "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-09 08:49 -0600
    Re: Alignment of three tables Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2013-06-09 08:18 -0700
    Re: Alignment of three tables Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-06-09 20:02 +0000
      Re: Alignment of three tables "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-09 15:01 -0600
        Re: Alignment of three tables Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-06-09 22:50 +0000
      Re: Alignment of three tables Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-06-10 00:46 +0200
        Re: Alignment of three tables John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-06-10 14:41 +0100
          Re: Alignment of three tables Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-06-10 17:35 +0200
        Re: Alignment of three tables "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-10 09:08 -0600
          Re: Alignment of three tables "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-06-10 11:16 -0600
            Re: Alignment of three tables Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 02:05 +0000
              Re: Alignment of three tables Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-06-11 05:09 +0200
                Re: Alignment of three tables "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2013-06-11 10:59 +0200
                  Re: Alignment of three tables Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-06-11 16:51 +0200
                Re: Alignment of three tables Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2013-06-14 15:38 +0200
                  Re: Alignment of three tables Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2013-06-14 20:26 +0200
                    Re: Alignment of three tables Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2013-06-14 21:22 +0200
                      Re: Alignment of three tables Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2013-06-15 00:36 +0200
                        Re: Alignment of three tables Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-06-15 12:04 +0200
                    Re: Alignment of three tables Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-06-15 11:41 +0200
                      Re: Alignment of three tables Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2013-06-15 13:53 +0200
                        Re: Alignment of three tables Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2013-06-17 04:28 -0700
    Re: Alignment of three tables "Andy" <andy@NOSPAMmanyplay.com> - 2013-06-10 09:19 +0100
    Re: Alignment of three tables Dr J R Stockton <reply1300@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2013-06-12 18:56 +0100

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#20303

On 2013-06-15 11:41, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Eric Bednarz wrote:
>> Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> writes:
>>> There's one thing I don't understand about that algorithm:
>>>
>>>    {} + ""
>> 
>> That's a block statement followed by an unary + operator with the empty
>> string as its operand.
...
> The curious – maybe not obvious – thing here is, though, that it is _not_ 
> the "" that causes the "[object Object]" result, but the conversion of the 
> Object instance to a primitive value.

Exactly. I've been reading the standard up and down, looking for my
mistake. I was really perplexed, because _either_ of the operands should
have forced a string result, even with the hint for ToPrimitive for
native objects defaulting to Number. That what I was looking at wasn't
an addition at all never entered my mind. The only consolation is that
"{} + ..." is very unlikely to occur outside of an expression in a
normal program.


- stefan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#20321

Stefan Weiss wrote:

>                                       The only consolation is that
> "{} + ..." is very unlikely to occur outside of an expression in a
> normal program.

And exactly how many normal programs do you run across?  I keep coming
across some fairly abnormal ones myself!  :-)

  -- Scott

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#20188

"Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> wrote in message 
news:b1jivmF20mgU1@mid.individual.net...
> Hi:
>
>    I have three tables in a <div> placed on the right-half of the screen.
>
>    These tables are placed one beneath the other, and have the same number 
> of columns <td>.  I want the columns of all three tables to be lined up 
> vertically.
>
>    What is the best technique please ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- 
> Mel Smith
>
>
>

Hi Mel,

I would just make it all one table and use css to style the gaps.


Andy 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#20257

In comp.lang.javascript message <b1jivmF20mgU1@mid.individual.net>, Sun,
9 Jun 2013 08:49:24, Mel Smith <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> posted:

>Hi:
>
>    I have three tables in a <div> placed on the right-half of the screen.
>
>    These tables are placed one beneath the other, and have the same number
>of columns <td>.  I want the columns of all three tables to be lined up
>vertically.
>
>    What is the best technique please ?

Consider using a single <table> element without any HTML borders, and
use CSS to style the bordering, etc., that you need so that it looks
like three tables.


Apologies for inadvertent belatedness; I thought that it had been sent.

-- 
 (c) John Stockton, nr London UK               Reply address via Home Page.
   news:comp.lang.javascript FAQ <http://www.jibbering.com/faq/index.html>.
   <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-index.htm> jscr maths, dates, sources.
   <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> TP/BP/Delphi/jscr/&c, FAQ items, links.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript

csiph-web