Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #17201 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Fokke Nauta <fnautaNO@SPAMsolfon.nl> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-11-13 15:34 +0100 |
| Last post | 2012-11-16 09:01 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 on this page of 24 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript
Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly Fokke Nauta <fnautaNO@SPAMsolfon.nl> - 2012-11-13 15:34 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-11-13 17:37 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly Fokke Nauta <fnautaNO@SPAMsolfon.nl> - 2012-11-13 17:54 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly Fokke Nauta <fnautaNO@SPAMsolfon.nl> - 2012-11-14 08:33 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-11-14 10:31 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly Fokke Nauta <fnautaNO@SPAMsolfon.nl> - 2012-11-14 10:41 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-11-14 11:24 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly Fokke Nauta <fnautaNO@SPAMsolfon.nl> - 2012-11-14 13:35 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly Tim Slattery <Slattery_T@bls.gov> - 2012-11-14 08:44 -0500
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly Fokke Nauta <fnautaNO@SPAMsolfon.nl> - 2012-11-14 14:54 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-11-14 20:38 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-11-14 21:43 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-11-14 14:16 +0000
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-11-14 16:14 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-11-14 11:24 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly Fokke Nauta <fnautaNO@SPAMsolfon.nl> - 2012-11-14 13:40 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-11-14 16:50 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly Fokke Nauta <fnautaNO@SPAMsolfon.nl> - 2012-11-14 18:47 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-11-14 20:17 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly Fokke Nauta <fnautaNO@SPAMsolfon.nl> - 2012-11-15 08:59 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-11-15 09:41 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly Fokke Nauta <fnautaNO@SPAMsolfon.nl> - 2012-11-15 13:11 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-11-15 14:06 +0100
Re: Continuous vertical marquee doesn't work properly Fokke Nauta <fnautaNO@SPAMsolfon.nl> - 2012-11-16 09:01 +0100
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-11-15 09:41 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <50a4aaab$0$18067$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> |
| In reply to | #17253 |
Le 15/11/12 08:59, Fokke Nauta a écrit :
> On 14/11/2012 20:17, SAM wrote:
>>
>> not far form line 145 in file 'users/dictee/shtml/organisatie.shtml'
>> for instance
>
> In my script it was on a different line (82)
as it is in an shtml file (with possible inclusions) not strange that it
isn't on same line
> I made the change you suggested. Is this better? Does it now work for you?
I don't know what happens but it is like the function populate() didn't fire
If I launch it after load is complete that finaly works, images are
there and scrolling too (unfortunately, as I hate those disturbing
animations)
... no way to stop all that agitation ?
maybe replacing
window.onload=populate
with
window.onload=function(){setTimeout(populate,2000)};
???
--
Stéphane Moriaux avec/with iMac-intel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fokke Nauta <fnautaNO@SPAMsolfon.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-11-15 13:11 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <agk4esF9a7gU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #17254 |
On 15/11/2012 09:41, SAM wrote:
> Le 15/11/12 08:59, Fokke Nauta a écrit :
>> On 14/11/2012 20:17, SAM wrote:
>>>
>>> not far form line 145 in file 'users/dictee/shtml/organisatie.shtml'
>>> for instance
>>
>> In my script it was on a different line (82)
>
> as it is in an shtml file (with possible inclusions) not strange that it
> isn't on same line
OK. The whole script is included as one.
I thought you may have read the script as I placed it underneath in my
1st post.
>> I made the change you suggested. Is this better? Does it now work for
>> you?
>
> I don't know what happens but it is like the function populate() didn't
> fire
> If I launch it after load is complete that finaly works, images are
> there and scrolling too (unfortunately, as I hate those disturbing
> animations)
I'm not so keen on them either. But they are the sponsors of the event
the site is about, and they all need a place in the left column (where
they now move). There were too many pictures, the column would have
become too high. And there will be still pictures to be added.
The only solution was to rotate them.
> ... no way to stop all that agitation ?
>
> maybe replacing
> window.onload=populate
> with
> window.onload=function(){setTimeout(populate,2000)};
> ???
>
>
What would that do?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-11-15 14:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <50a4e8cb$0$23453$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> |
| In reply to | #17257 |
Le 15/11/12 13:11, Fokke Nauta a écrit :
> On 15/11/2012 09:41, SAM wrote:
>
> There were too many pictures, the column would have
> become too high. And there will be still pictures to be added.
> The only solution was to rotate them.
No, the solution is to display in random ;-)
(the number possible of images on the allowed height)
>> ... no way to stop all that agitation ?
>>
>> maybe replacing
>> window.onload=populate
>> with
>> window.onload=function(){setTimeout(populate,2000)};
>
> What would that do?
That would launch the function which "populate" the left column with a
delay of 2 seconds after complete loading
sans garantie de succès
maybe IE +/- old will prefer :
window.onload=function(){setTimeout('populate()',2000)};
still without no guaranty
--
Stéphane Moriaux avec/with iMac-intel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fokke Nauta <fnautaNO@SPAMsolfon.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-11-16 09:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <agma7kFo6kpU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #17258 |
On 15/11/2012 14:06, SAM wrote:
> Le 15/11/12 13:11, Fokke Nauta a écrit :
>> On 15/11/2012 09:41, SAM wrote:
>>
>> There were too many pictures, the column would have
>> become too high. And there will be still pictures to be added.
>> The only solution was to rotate them.
>
> No, the solution is to display in random ;-)
> (the number possible of images on the allowed height)
>
>>> ... no way to stop all that agitation ?
>>>
>>> maybe replacing
>>> window.onload=populate
>>> with
>>> window.onload=function(){setTimeout(populate,2000)};
>>
>> What would that do?
>
> That would launch the function which "populate" the left column with a
> delay of 2 seconds after complete loading
>
> sans garantie de succès
>
>
> maybe IE +/- old will prefer :
> window.onload=function(){setTimeout('populate()',2000)};
>
> still without no guaranty
>
Thanks, but I rather keep it the way it is.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript
csiph-web