Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #29829 > unrolled thread

Compact connected regular graphs

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript

Contents

  Compact connected regular graphs jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-03-06 02:43 -0800
    Re: Compact connected regular graphs jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-03-06 05:44 -0800
      Re: Compact connected regular graphs Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-03-06 14:44 +0000
        Re: Compact connected regular graphs Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-06 19:21 +0100
          Re: Compact connected regular graphs Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-03-06 20:29 +0000
            Re: Compact connected regular graphs Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-06 23:21 +0100
              Re: Compact connected regular graphs Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-03-06 22:36 +0000
                Re: Compact connected regular graphs "Mr. Stefan Weiss" <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 16:48 +0100
          Re: Compact connected regular graphs John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-03-07 14:04 +0000
    Re: Compact connected regular graphs "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@no-spam.ws> - 2016-03-06 12:41 -0800

#29829 — Compact connected regular graphs

How come all graphs using 42 links and more then 84 nodes have compact  regular connected solutions?

Did turn off animation for more than a couple of thousands of  links so the animation is off when searching but script give message and numerical results on search.

http://jt.node365.se/nodes15.html

Do anyone know?


http://jt.node365.se/Compact.rtf

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#29831

Den söndag 6 mars 2016 kl. 11:43:56 UTC+1 skrev jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> How come all graphs using 42 links and more then 84 nodes have compact  regular connected solutions?
> 
> Did turn off animation for more than a couple of thousands of  links so the animation is off when searching but script give message and numerical results on search.
> 
> http://jt.node365.se/nodes15.html
> 
> Do anyone know?
> 
> 
> http://jt.node365.se/Compact.rtf

If there only was an ecmascript compatible interpreter with load and save data.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#29832

jonas.thornvall@gmail.com writes:
<snip>
> If there only was an ecmascript compatible interpreter with load and
> save data.

There is on my system (Linux).  I use node.js[1] but there are others.
If you use Windows it might be a bit harder to find something but I'd be
surprised if there's nothing.

[1] https://nodejs.org/en/

-- 
Ben.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#29834

Ben Bacarisse wrote:

> jonas.thornvall@gmail.com writes:
> <snip>
>> If there only was an ecmascript compatible interpreter with load and
>> save data.
> 
> There is on my system (Linux).

That’s _GNU/Linux_ or _GNU+Linux_.  Give everyone involved in making it at 
least equal credit, please.

<http://www.gnu.org/home.en.html>

> I use node.js[1] but there are others.  If you use Windows it might be a
> bit harder to find something but I'd be surprised if there's nothing.
> 
> [1] https://nodejs.org/en/

Node.js is _not_ “an ecmascript compatible interpreter”; it is an “event-
driven I/O server-side JavaScript environment based on V8” or, IOW, “a 
JavaScript runtime built on Chrome’s V8 JavaScript engine” (ibid.)

AISB, ECMAScript implementations like Google V8 JavaScript are multi-purpose 
programming languages, but they are not self-sufficient: different to other 
programming languages, a runtime environment is required to make use of 
them.  It is then the *environment* that provides features such as the 
ability to load and save data, _not_ the implementation or the 
“interpreter”.  The implementation (programming language and 
compiler/interpreter) are *the means to use* the features provided by the 
runtime environment.

It is important to be able to separate conceptually, and therefore mentally, 
the ECMAScript implementation from the runtime environment in which it is 
used.  In this case, the *same* implementation (Google V8 JavaScript) can 
also be used in a *different* environment (e.g., Google Chrome and, in 
general, Chromium-based applications) that provides a *different* set of 
*additional* features.

I cannot stress this enough: The *same* source code works *unchanged* in 
different environments only as long it only uses *features common to both 
environments*; in the minimum case, it only uses features that are provided 
by the *implementation*.  And even that is true only as long as the 
*versions* of the implementation are either *the same or compatible* with 
regard to the *used* features.

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#29837

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
<snip>
> I cannot stress this enough: [...]

Not I this: is there anything more I can do to get you to add me to your
kill-file?  Sadly I post under my real name, but my attribution lines
are maybe too long?  What if I were to stop snipping in my replies?

<snip>
-- 
Ben.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#29840

Ben Bacarisse wrote:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
> <snip>
>> I cannot stress this enough: [...]
> 
> Not I this: is there anything more I can do to get you to add me to your
> kill-file?

Yes.  However, if you would do it you would risk getting added to killfiles 
of other people as well.  I do not think that you are *that* stupid.

> Sadly I post under my real name, but my attribution lines
> are maybe too long?

The length of your attribution lines is appropriate, although you could omit 
the “From” address as well so that they, when quoted, would not as quickly 
exceed the customary limit of 80 characters per line unless wrapped, which 
would otherwise make discussions in which you participate harder to read.
Which of course is what my saying “attribution *line*, _not_ attribution 
novel” is all about.

> What if I were to stop snipping in my replies?

That would be a stupid thing to do; see above.

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#29841

How about top posting with a full quote -- will that do it?

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
> Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>
>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
>> <snip>
>>> I cannot stress this enough: [...]
>> 
>> Not I this: is there anything more I can do to get you to add me to your
>> kill-file?
>
> Yes.  However, if you would do it you would risk getting added to killfiles 
> of other people as well.  I do not think that you are *that* stupid.
>
>> Sadly I post under my real name, but my attribution lines
>> are maybe too long?
>
> The length of your attribution lines is appropriate, although you could omit 
> the “From” address as well so that they, when quoted, would not as quickly 
> exceed the customary limit of 80 characters per line unless wrapped, which 
> would otherwise make discussions in which you participate harder to read.
> Which of course is what my saying “attribution *line*, _not_ attribution 
> novel” is all about.
>
>> What if I were to stop snipping in my replies?
>
> That would be a stupid thing to do; see above.

-- 
Ben.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#29847

Hello Ben,

it looks like your client has stripped the signatures from your helpful
fullquote. What a shame. I have manually added them back.

- stefan


On the sixth day of the month of March in the year 2016 in the Common
Era, Ben Bacarisse wrote to the group comp.lang.Javascript:

> How about top posting with a full quote -- will that do it?
> 
> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
>> Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>
>>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
>>> <snip>
>>>> I cannot stress this enough: [...]
>>>
>>> Not I this: is there anything more I can do to get you to add me to your
>>> kill-file?
>>
>> Yes.  However, if you would do it you would risk getting added to killfiles 
>> of other people as well.  I do not think that you are *that* stupid.
>>
>>> Sadly I post under my real name, but my attribution lines
>>> are maybe too long?
>>
>> The length of your attribution lines is appropriate, although you could omit 
>> the “From” address as well so that they, when quoted, would not as quickly 
>> exceed the customary limit of 80 characters per line unless wrapped, which 
>> would otherwise make discussions in which you participate harder to read.
>> Which of course is what my saying “attribution *line*, _not_ attribution 
>> novel” is all about.
>>
>>> What if I were to stop snipping in my replies?
>>
>> That would be a stupid thing to do; see above.
>> 
>> --
>> PointedEars
>> FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
>> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
>> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
>
> --
> Ben.

-- 
A tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Original content of this message licensed under the WTFPL.
Wisdom is wearying, folly is fun.
Follow me on Facebook!
Ask me about cheap offers for Cialis and panda pheromones.
💩

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#29846

On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 19:21:13 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
<PointedEars@web.de> wrote:


  <snip>
>the runtime environment
  <snip>

Its real name is the computational environment. See ECMA 262.

  John

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#29838

On 3/6/2016 2:43 AM, jonas.thornvall@gmail.com wrote:
 > How come all graphs using 42 links and more then 84
 > nodes have compact  regular connected solutions?

 > Did turn off animation for more than a couple of
 > thousands of  links so the animation is off when
 > searching but script give message and numerical
 > results on search.

 > http://jt.node365.se/nodes15.html

 > Do anyone know?

 > http://jt.node365.se/Compact.rtf

FWIW, you just might find the following information
to be fairly interesting:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kautz_graph

Also, research:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SiCortex

And search the text of the html for the string "Kautz"...

;^)

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript

csiph-web