Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #16157 > unrolled thread

How to construct a tomorrow?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript

Contents

  How to construct a tomorrow? justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-09-26 14:47 -0700
    Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2012-09-27 00:58 +0200
      Re: How to construct a tomorrow? justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-09-26 17:47 -0700
        Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-26 19:53 -0700
          Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Dr J R Stockton <reply1239@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-09-28 18:40 +0100
            Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-29 20:52 -0700
      Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Dr J R Stockton <reply1239@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-09-28 18:30 +0100
        Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2012-09-29 02:00 +0200
          Re: How to construct a tomorrow? John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-09-29 10:02 +0100
          Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-30 14:29 +0200
            Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2012-09-30 23:24 +0200
          Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Dr J R Stockton <reply1239@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-09-30 19:55 +0100
    Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Dr J R Stockton <reply1239@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-09-27 21:32 +0100
      Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2012-09-28 01:03 +0200
        Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-27 16:36 -0700
        Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-28 10:37 +0200
        Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Dr J R Stockton <reply1239@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-09-29 20:39 +0100
          Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2012-09-30 23:37 +0200
      Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-28 09:25 +1000
      Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-09-28 08:37 -0700
        Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-28 18:48 +0200
        Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Dr J R Stockton <reply1239@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-09-29 20:40 +0100
          Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-30 18:32 +1000
      Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-09-28 23:57 +0200
        Re: How to construct a tomorrow? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-30 13:49 +0200

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#16231

Daniel Pitts wrote:

> On 9/27/12 1:32 PM, Dr J R Stockton wrote:
>> In comp.lang.javascript message <6aae09ab-0d45-4c30-accf-909d7445c6a2@o8
>> g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:47:31, justaguy
>> <lichunshen84@gmail.com> posted:
>>
>>>
>>> var today = new Date();
>>>        today = today.toDateString();
>>>        // alert(today);
>>>        // all good
>>>
>>> how do we get tomorrow based on today?
>>> var tomorrow = today + 1
>>> // definitely won't work
>>> // and javascript does not something like dateAdd function or method
>>> // googling get some long worded code to get a little thing done, your
>>> thoughts?
>>
>> Read <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-dates.htm> and its friends, and
>> save the rest of us getting terribly terribly tired of you.
>>
>> Also, please indicate whether you come from an English-speaking country,
>> or the USA, or elsewhere.  It will help us to judge your IQ from tour
>> writing, which is all we have to go on,  Otherwise, the worst is likely
>> to be assumed.
> Why should we judge someone's IQ at all? Why not always speak/write as
> clearly we possibly can, explaining things with intuitive analogies,
> using as few ambiguous clauses as possible.
> 
> The original poster is not the *only* audience for your posts.  So
> someone who comes by later and has a similar problem as the OP can also
> learn from your responses, whether their (perceived) IQ is higher or
> lower than the OP's (perceived) IQ.
> 
> Just because you put Dr before your name, doesn't make you better or
> smarter than *anyone* else. Do you even really have a PhD? Do you really
> think that matters?  Your condescension should make you feel ashamed of
> yourself.
> 
> Oh, and as for getting tired of a poster, no one asked *you* personally
> to read all of their posts.  If you don't feel like answering politely
> and in the spirit of community, you may as well delete your news-reader
> and leave us alone.

John Stockton's publicly uttered irritation is understandable to the extent, 
and only to it, that the OP have not been asking a single smart question 
since they got here: they do not care to read the good manuals available for 
free online which would probably answer their questions without posting, 
they blame the programming language(s) for their failings, and they continue 
to ignore basic posting guidelines that have been repeatedly laid out to 
them by more patient responders (and the FAQ, of course).

So this newsgroup can do without those questions, his condescending attitude 
when responding to them, the attached colonialism and xenophobia, and 
finally these meta-subthreads altogether.


PointedEars
-- 
Sometimes, what you learn is wrong. If those wrong ideas are close to the 
root of the knowledge tree you build on a particular subject, pruning the 
bad branches can sometimes cause the whole tree to collapse.
  -- Mike Duffy in cljs, <news:Xns9FB6521286DB8invalidcom@94.75.214.39>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#16254

In comp.lang.javascript message <Suj9s.3882$sB3.3218@newsfe05.iad>, Fri,
28 Sep 2012 08:37:19, Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net
> posted:

>On 9/27/12 1:32 PM, Dr J R Stockton wrote:

>> Also, please indicate whether you come from an English-speaking country,
>> or the USA, or elsewhere.  It will help us to judge your IQ from tour
>> writing, which is all we have to go on,  Otherwise, the worst is likely
>> to be assumed.
>Why should we judge someone's IQ at all? Why not always speak/write as
>clearly we possibly can, explaining things with intuitive analogies,
>using as few ambiguous clauses as possible.

Because, before replying, one must first try to determine what a poster
might mean from what the poster has written.  That includes whether the
poster is a bumbling fool, or is handicapped by writing EFL.

>The original poster is not the *only* audience for your posts.  So
>someone who comes by later and has a similar problem as the OP can also
>learn from your responses, whether their (perceived) IQ is higher or
>lower than the OP's (perceived) IQ.

You have a manifest, but justified, inferiority complex.

-- 
 (c) John Stockton, nr London UK               Reply address via Home Page.
   news:comp.lang.javascript FAQ <http://www.jibbering.com/faq/index.html>.
   <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-index.htm> jscr maths, dates, sources.
   <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> TP/BP/Delphi/jscr/&c, FAQ items, links.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#16265

On 30/09/2012 5:40 AM, Dr J R Stockton wrote:
> In comp.lang.javascript message <Suj9s.3882$sB3.3218@newsfe05.iad>, Fri,
> 28 Sep 2012 08:37:19, Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net
>> posted:
>
>> On 9/27/12 1:32 PM, Dr J R Stockton wrote:
>
>>> Also, please indicate whether you come from an English-speaking country,
>>> or the USA, or elsewhere.  It will help us to judge your IQ from tour
>>> writing, which is all we have to go on,  Otherwise, the worst is likely
>>> to be assumed.
>> Why should we judge someone's IQ at all? Why not always speak/write as
>> clearly we possibly can, explaining things with intuitive analogies,
>> using as few ambiguous clauses as possible.
>
> Because, before replying, one must first try to determine what a poster
> might mean from what the poster has written.  That includes whether the
> poster is a bumbling fool, or is handicapped by writing EFL.
>
>> The original poster is not the *only* audience for your posts.  So
>> someone who comes by later and has a similar problem as the OP can also
>> learn from your responses, whether their (perceived) IQ is higher or
>> lower than the OP's (perceived) IQ.
>
> You have a manifest, but justified, inferiority complex.

I like how you "slam" anyone that finds any your replies as offensive as 
you apparently find those of PE.

Andrew Poulos

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#16233

Dr J R Stockton <reply1239@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> writes:

> Also, please indicate whether you come from an English-speaking country,
> or the USA, or elsewhere.  It will help us to judge your IQ from tour
> writing, [...]

Still having trouble with that pesky touring test, don't you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#16269

Eric Bednarz wrote:

> Dr J R Stockton <reply1239@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> writes:
>> Also, please indicate whether you come from an English-speaking country,
>> or the USA, or elsewhere.  It will help us to judge your IQ from tour
>> writing, [...]
> 
> Still having trouble with that pesky touring test, don't you?

If the ability to drive a vehicle was indicative of a person's IQ, there 
would be no traffic jams ;-)


PointedEars
-- 
Use any version of Microsoft Frontpage to create your site.
(This won't prevent people from viewing your source, but no one
will want to steal it.)
  -- from <http://www.vortex-webdesign.com/help/hidesource.htm> (404-comp.)

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript

csiph-web