Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #22029 > unrolled thread

Python to Javascript translator

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript

Contents

  Python to Javascript translator salvatore.didio@gmail.com - 2013-11-17 11:20 -0800
    Re: Python to Javascript translator Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-11-18 00:59 +0100
      Re: Python to Javascript translator Salvatore DI DIO <salvatore.didio@gmail.com> - 2013-11-18 02:54 -0800
      Re: Python to Javascript translator Salvatore DI DIO <salvatore.didio@gmail.com> - 2013-11-18 02:59 -0800
        Re: Python to Javascript translator Salvatore DI DIO <salvatore.didio@gmail.com> - 2013-11-18 02:59 -0800
        Re: Python to Javascript translator Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-11-18 13:27 +0100

#22029 — Python to Javascript translator

Hello,

If someone  is interested about a fast Python to Javascript translator (not a compiler like Brython which is another beast)

Here is a link of a RapydScript Tester.
For now it's only for windows.

Regards

http://salvatore.pythonanywhere.com/static/Projects/RapydScriptDemo.exe

(I can if there is needs publish it for mac and linux)

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#22031

salvatore.didio@gmail.com wrote:

> If someone  is interested about a fast Python to Javascript translator
> (not a compiler like Brython which is another beast)
> 
> Here is a link of a RapydScript Tester.
> For now it's only for windows.
> 
> Regards
> 
> http://salvatore.pythonanywhere.com/static/Projects/RapydScriptDemo.exe
> 
> (I can if there is needs publish it for mac and linux)

The first thing that you do not know is that there is no Javascript: 
<http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>

I would consider this basic knowledge a prerequisite to writing anything 
that generates code that can be executed in a subset of sufficiently 
conforming implementations of ECMAScript.

And why should anyone run the risk of executing malware when executing your 
anonymously published binary?  Where is your source code?

I could probably do the same on *x (that includes Mac OS X) with a simple 
shell script (sed(1) comes to mind).  But a language “translator” does not 
necessarily create good code.  As you should know, there are things in 
Python that you would do quite differently in other programming languages 
because Python by comparison is very expressive indeed and has a big runtime 
library – approaches that are called “pythonic” because of that.  For a 
start, ECMAScript implementations do not need to include an output mechanism 
as Python does; something like Python's “print(…)” is provided by the 
respective runtime environment instead.
 
-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22033

You are perfectly right concerning the source.
I will publish them
You can view a demo online here :

http://salvatore.pythonanywhere.com/RapydScript/default/demo

Regards



Le lundi 18 novembre 2013 00:59:44 UTC+1, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn a écrit :
> salvatore.didio@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > If someone  is interested about a fast Python to Javascript translator
> 
> > (not a compiler like Brython which is another beast)
> 
> > 
> 
> > Here is a link of a RapydScript Tester.
> 
> > For now it's only for windows.
> 
> > 
> 
> > Regards
> 
> > 
> 
> > http://salvatore.pythonanywhere.com/static/Projects/RapydScriptDemo.exe
> 
> > 
> 
> > (I can if there is needs publish it for mac and linux)
> 
> 
> 
> The first thing that you do not know is that there is no Javascript: 
> 
> <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
> 
> 
> 
> I would consider this basic knowledge a prerequisite to writing anything 
> 
> that generates code that can be executed in a subset of sufficiently 
> 
> conforming implementations of ECMAScript.
> 
> 
> 
> And why should anyone run the risk of executing malware when executing your 
> 
> anonymously published binary?  Where is your source code?
> 
> 
> 
> I could probably do the same on *x (that includes Mac OS X) with a simple 
> 
> shell script (sed(1) comes to mind).  But a language “translator” does not 
> 
> necessarily create good code.  As you should know, there are things in 
> 
> Python that you would do quite differently in other programming languages 
> 
> because Python by comparison is very expressive indeed and has a big runtime 
> 
> library – approaches that are called “pythonic” because of that.  For a 
> 
> start, ECMAScript implementations do not need to include an output mechanism 
> 
> as Python does; something like Python's “print(…)” is provided by the 
> 
> respective runtime environment instead.
> 
>  
> 
> -- 
> 
> PointedEars
> 
> 
> 
> Twitter: @PointedEars2
> 
> Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22034

Please, test the online version and see if
the generated code is not well formed.
And also see the source code of the demos.

How can you make assumptions about the generated source without
having seeing it.

Please tell me your opinions after having look at it.

Regards

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22035

Le lundi 18 novembre 2013 11:59:08 UTC+1, Salvatore DI DIO a écrit :
> Please, test the online version and see if
> 
> the generated code is not well formed.
> 
> And also see the source code of the demos.
> 
> 
> 
> How can you make assumptions about the generated source without
> 
> having seeing it.
> 
> 
> 
> Please tell me your opinions after having look at it.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22039

Salvatore DI DIO wrote:

> How can you make assumptions about the generated source without
> having seeing it.

It figures:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> The first thing that you do not know is that there is no Javascript: 
>> <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
>> 
>> I would consider this basic knowledge a prerequisite to writing anything 
>> that generates code that can be executed in a subset of sufficiently 
>> conforming implementations of ECMAScript.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript

csiph-web