Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #28821 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-11 18:53 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-10-11 18:53 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: keywords in JavaScript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-11 18:53 +0200
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-11 18:53 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: keywords in JavaScript |
| Message-ID | <17839156.YQJfU3xvgP@PointedEars.de> |
Stefan Ram wrote: > For JavaScript, there does not seem to be a language specification at > all. True. > It is just an implementation. Mozilla JavaScript is an implementation of ECMAScript. Google V8 JavaScript is another implementation of ECMAScript. There are more. Different versions of different implementations implement different Editions of ECMAScript in different ways. Some of those ways are conforming to the Specification, others are not. > But an implementation of what? Certainly, it does not implement > ECMAScript 2015. Incorrect; some more recent versions of languages whose name contains “JavaScript” implement it partially. > One might thus conclude: The behavior of a JavaScript > implementation is specifed by the behavior of Firefox. Ex falso quodlibet. If only you would stop jumping to conclusions, and do *proper* research instead, you could make real progress. -- PointedEars FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript
csiph-web