Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #26333 > unrolled thread

yak: convert js to html

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript

Contents

  yak: convert js to html glathoud <glathoud@yahoo.fr> - 2014-12-16 01:19 -0800
    Re: yak: convert js to html "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-12-16 13:30 +0100
      Re: yak: convert js to html glathoud <glathoud@yahoo.fr> - 2014-12-16 23:47 -0800
        Re: yak: convert js to html "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-12-17 09:06 +0100
          Re: yak: convert js to html glathoud <glathoud@yahoo.fr> - 2014-12-17 00:35 -0800
            Re: yak: convert js to html "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-12-17 10:16 +0100
              Re: yak: convert js to html glathoud <glathoud@yahoo.fr> - 2014-12-17 02:20 -0800
                Re: yak: convert js to html "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-12-17 12:03 +0100
                  Re: yak: convert js to html glathoud <glathoud@yahoo.fr> - 2014-12-17 23:12 -0800
          Re: yak: convert js to html "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2014-12-17 22:22 +0100
            Re: yak: convert js to html Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-12-18 01:17 +0100
              [OT] was: yak: convert js to html "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2014-12-18 10:25 +0100
                Re: [OT] was: yak: convert js to html Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-12-18 11:25 +0100

#26333 — yak: convert js to html

Hello,

I'd like to share this: https://github.com/glathoud/js.yak

Constructive feedback is welcome.

Best regards,
Guillaume

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#26334

glathoud <glathoud@yahoo.fr> wrote on 16 dec 2014 in comp.lang.javascript:

> I'd like to share this: https://github.com/glathoud/js.yak

"if you absolutely want pure HTML output."

Why would anyone want that?
And btw, what is "pure" in this sense?

Please don't answer that, it would be OT.
 
> Constructive feedback is welcome.

As this is a usenet NG, 
stating what responses are welcome and what not
is stretching the Netiquette.

-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26345

Evertjan, thanks for your feedback.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26346

glathoud <glathoud@yahoo.fr> wrote on 17 dec 2014 in comp.lang.javascript:

> Evertjan, thanks for your feedback.

Perhaps, 
however,
this is not email, 
but usenet,
so, 
if you don't quote relevant parts, 
even I do not exactly remember,
wat it was about.

-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26347

On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 9:06:56 AM UTC+1, Evertjan. wrote:
> glathoud <glathoud@yahoo.fr> wrote on 17 dec 2014 in comp.lang.javascript:
> 
> > Evertjan, thanks for your feedback.
> 
> Perhaps, 
> however,
> this is not email, 
> but usenet,
> so, 
> if you don't quote relevant parts, 
> even I do not exactly remember,
> wat it was about.
> 
> -- 
> Evertjan.
> The Netherlands.
> (Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

You are right, I did not quote. Thanks for your feedback. Here is a corrected answer:

glathoud <glat...@yahoo.fr> wrote on 16 dec 2014 in comp.lang.javascript:

> > I'd like to share this: https://github.com/glathoud/js.yak
>
> "if you absolutely want pure HTML output."
> 
> Why would anyone want that?
> And btw, what is "pure" in this sense?
> 
> Please don't answer that, it would be OT.
>  
> > Constructive feedback is welcome.
> 
> As this is a usenet NG,
> stating what responses are welcome and what not
> is stretching the Netiquette.

Evertjan, thanks for your feedback.

By the way, I do not remember excluding non-constructive feedback.

Best regards,
Guillaume
-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26348

glathoud <glathoud@yahoo.fr> wrote on 17 dec 2014 in comp.lang.javascript:

> By the way, I do not remember excluding non-constructive feedback.

;-)

I want my feet back, Guillaume!

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yak_(disambiguation)>

-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26349

On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 10:17:02 AM UTC+1, Evertjan. wrote:
> glathoud <glathoud@yahoo.fr> wrote on 17 dec 2014 in comp.lang.javascript:
> 
> > By the way, I do not remember excluding non-constructive feedback.
> 
> ;-)
> 
> I want my feet back, Guillaume!

I'll try my very best to help. Maybe you can give a hint.

> 
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yak_(disambiguation)>

Thanks for the information... But that is opening a whole lot of issues! What should I do? Especially, how can one shave all these types of yaks?

Guillaume

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26350

glathoud <glathoud@yahoo.fr> wrote on 17 dec 2014 in comp.lang.javascript:

>> I want my feet back, Guillaume!
> 
> I'll try my very best to help. Maybe you can give a hint.

Perhaps in hindsight?

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindsight_bias>

[Biais rétrospectif]

-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26356

On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 12:03:48 PM UTC+1, Evertjan. wrote:
> glathoud <glathoud@yahoo.fr> wrote on 17 dec 2014 in comp.lang.javascript:
> 
> >> I want my feet back, Guillaume!
> > 
> > I'll try my very best to help. Maybe you can give a hint.
> 
> Perhaps in hindsight?
> 
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindsight_bias>
> 
> [Biais rétrospectif]
> 
> -- 
> Evertjan.
> The Netherlands.
> (Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

Thank you very much for all the information you provided in this thread, including, but not limited to, the parts relevant to the original post.

Best regards,
Guillaume

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26352

On 17.12.2014 09:06, Evertjan. wrote:
> glathoud <glathoud@yahoo.fr> wrote on 17 dec 2014 in comp.lang.javascript:
>
>> Evertjan, thanks for your feedback.
>
> Perhaps,
> however,
> this is not email,
> but usenet,
> so,
> if you don't quote relevant parts,
> even I do not exactly remember,
> wat it was about.
>
Neither do I.

Thank you for keeping usenet clean. We need guys like you commenting on every post 
that it is off topic.

/Str.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26353

M. Strobel <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> wrote:
^^         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Thank you for keeping usenet clean. We need guys like you commenting on
> every post that it is off topic.

Pot, kettle, black.

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26358 — [OT] was: yak: convert js to html

On 18.12.2014 01:17, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> M. Strobel <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> wrote:
> ^^         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Thank you for keeping usenet clean. We need guys like you commenting on
>> every post that it is off topic.
>
> Pot, kettle, black.
>

The phrase "The pot calling the kettle black" is an idiom used to claim that a person 
is guilty of the very thing of which they accuse another.

Now either your comment or the wikipedia entry does not make sense, Mr. Spock.

But anyway, we can leave it at that. Frohe Weihnachten.

/Str.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26359 — Re: [OT] was: yak: convert js to html

M. Strobel wrote:

> On 18.12.2014 01:17, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> M. Strobel <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> wrote:
>> ^^         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> Thank you for keeping usenet clean. We need guys like you commenting on
>>> every post that it is off topic.
>>
>> Pot, kettle, black.
> 
> The phrase "The pot calling the kettle black" is an idiom used to claim
> that a person is guilty of the very thing of which they accuse another.
> 
> Now either your comment or the wikipedia entry does not make sense, Mr.
> Spock.

It is curious, to say the least, that someone who – despite being notified 
several times that it is not appropriate – continues to violate the 
technical and social rules that make Usenet what it is, including the rules 
laid out by their service provider, would dare to speak on behalf of all 
Usenet users, in a posting in a newsgroup they have posted to for the first 
time (as far as Usenet history[tm] is concerned), attacking a regular of 
that very group (however misguided that regular may be), while complaining 
about an response that was not strictly off-topic in a posting that clearly 
was off-topic.

I strongly suggest you read a FAQ on posting in cljs; see my sig.

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript

csiph-web