Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #17183 > unrolled thread

ot: html5 group

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript

Contents

  ot: html5 group justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-11-11 15:05 -0800
    Re: ot: html5 group Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2012-11-12 14:37 +0100
      Re: ot: html5 group justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-11-12 06:46 -0800
      Re: ot: html5 group Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-11-12 15:56 +0100
        Re: ot: html5 group justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-11-13 14:04 -0800

#17183 — ot: html5 group

Sorry for ot.  I did a quick search for a public HTML5 group (more
like Usenet group) to no avail.  Probably some of you might also be
interested in such a group.

First question, wouldn't you agree it's a good idea to have such a
group?
Secondly, who is able to create something like comp.lang.html5 if such
group already exists?

Thanks in advance.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#17190

justaguy wrote:
> I did a quick search for a public HTML5 group (more
> like Usenet group) to no avail.

Try comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html

-- 
Christoph M. Becker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#17191

On Nov 12, 8:36 am, Christoph Becker <cmbecke...@gmx.de> wrote:
> justaguy wrote:
> > I did a quick search for a public HTML5 group (more
> > like Usenet group) to no avail.
>
> Try comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html
>
> --
> Christoph M. Becker

Informative, yeah (I forgot), thank you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#17192

Christoph Becker wrote:

> justaguy wrote:
>> I did a quick search for a public HTML5 group (more
>> like Usenet group) to no avail.
> 
> Try comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html

That is not a good idea in all cases as the people who have subscribed to 
that newsgroup would, by contrast, be largely oblivious to the HTML5 DOM 
API.  Unlike HTML 4.01 and its predecessors, HTML5 is not merely a (draft) 
specification for a markup language.


PointedEars
-- 
Anyone who slaps a 'this page is best viewed with Browser X' label on
a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web,
when you had very little chance of reading a document written on another
computer, another word processor, or another network. -- Tim Berners-Lee

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#17210

On Nov 12, 9:56 am, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedE...@web.de>
wrote:
> Christoph Becker wrote:
> > justaguy wrote:
> >> I did a quick search for a public HTML5 group (more
> >> like Usenet group) to no avail.
>
> > Try comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html
>
> That is not a good idea in all cases as the people who have subscribed to
> that newsgroup would, by contrast, be largely oblivious to the HTML5 DOM
> API.  Unlike HTML 4.01 and its predecessors, HTML5 is not merely a (draft)
> specification for a markup language.
>
> PointedEars
> --
> Anyone who slaps a 'this page is best viewed with Browser X' label on
> a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web,
> when you had very little chance of reading a document written on another
> computer, another word processor, or another network. -- Tim Berners-Lee

Wouldn't be nice to have a new NG such as comp.infosystems.html5 ?
Talking of which, all the demo apps for drag and drop seems to simply
replace the content of target div, not good enough imho, would love to
see the ability for the target to contain many elements...

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript

csiph-web