Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #18271
| From | Dr J R Stockton <reply1300@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Email Vali8dation Problem |
| Date | 2013-01-26 20:51 +0000 |
| Organization | Home |
| Message-ID | <zENqaBGDHEBRFwQY@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <amb6f9Fhvk3U1@mid.individual.net> <JqhEReJ0KZARFws0@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid> <amfqn3Fj7guU1@mid.individual.net> <m2ip6lc6ng.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> |
In comp.lang.javascript message <m2ip6lc6ng.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl>, Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:08:35, Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> posted: >"Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> writes: > >> Dr JR said > >>> A valid address will contain at least one character, followed by @, >>> followed by at least one character, followed by a dot, and ending with >>> at least two alphabetic characters (though the RFC itself may be more >>> (or less) lenient) - and it will not end in ".invalid" or, IIRC & in >>> practice, "example.com". >> >> This is discouraging :( That was intentional, because that is what the facts mean. >It's also completely made up (but to be fair, the relevant RFCs were >probably not written by Britons and as such irrelevant in Stockton's >parallel universe). Give me an example, then, of a valid E-address which does not comply with the requirements of the >>> paragraph. Perhaps you have forgotten the difference between "necessary" and "necessary and sufficient", and/or that "A implies B" does not imply "B implies A". The ONLY way to fully validate an E-address is to use it and get an appropriate reply - that even that only validates the address, as far as each machine that checks it is concerned, at the time when that machine actually performed its check. One can check whether the address complies with the relevant RFCs; but there is no general guarantee that the machines which handle the mail item comply exactly with those RFCs - some mail software, for example, is written by Microsoft, and their software failed to comply fully with ISO 8601 - some may be written by Apple, and their JavaScript failed to comply with /Inter gravissimas/ of AD 1581 (I hope that you are familiar with at least some of the consequences of that document). -- (c) John Stockton, nr London UK Reply address via Home Page. news:comp.lang.javascript FAQ <http://www.jibbering.com/faq/index.html>. <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-index.htm> jscr maths, dates, sources. <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> TP/BP/Delphi/jscr/&c, FAQ items, links.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Email Vali8dation Problem "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-01-23 15:27 -0700
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2013-01-24 01:18 +0100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-01-24 02:06 +0100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2013-01-24 22:30 +0100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-01-24 22:38 +0100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2013-01-24 13:04 +1100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2013-01-24 22:24 +0100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-01-24 22:40 +0100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2013-01-26 00:12 +1100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2013-01-25 21:56 +0100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2013-01-26 10:56 +1100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2013-01-26 01:56 +0100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2013-01-26 20:14 +1100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2013-01-26 13:21 +0100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2013-01-26 15:07 +0200
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2013-01-26 16:04 +0200
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2013-01-26 16:37 +0200
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2013-01-26 15:46 +0100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2013-01-27 10:30 +1100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Andreas Bergmaier <andber93@web.de> - 2013-01-24 01:58 +0100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-01-24 02:08 +0100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2013-01-24 10:25 +0100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2013-01-24 11:15 +0100
Re: Email Validation Problem "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-01-24 08:53 -0700
Re: Email Validation Problem Luc Yen <luc@goal.tw> - 2013-01-25 13:53 -0800
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Dr J R Stockton <reply1300@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2013-01-24 19:59 +0000
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2013-01-25 09:37 -0700
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2013-01-25 22:08 +0100
Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Dr J R Stockton <reply1300@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2013-01-26 20:51 +0000
csiph-web