Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #14911
| From | Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: An aid for text site developers |
| Date | 2012-07-06 18:44 +0100 |
| Organization | Personal Software |
| Message-ID | <timstreater-FDCE1F.18442906072012@news.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <oc3lOnMQKd9PFw7R@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid> <XnsA0885F1BECB0eejj99@194.109.133.133> <oe8ev711k8tla1alhhg99vdl9o03oo2dta@4ax.com> |
In article <oe8ev711k8tla1alhhg99vdl9o03oo2dta@4ax.com>, Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> wrote: > On 06 Jul 2012 07:20:59 GMT, "Evertjan." > <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> wrote: > > >Dr J R Stockton wrote on 05 jul 2012 in comp.lang.javascript: > > > >> In each texty linky anchory page : > >> > >> <BODY onload="Hooks()"> > > > >In Chrome, such nonexisting onload is simply ignored, > >so testing is superfluous. > > Not superfluous. Firefox 13.0.1 ignores the error as well, but > IE 9.0.8122.16421 does not. > > I would rather have the error thrown. If I accidentally entered > the onload as "Hoks()", I would want to see an error right away. The > alternative is wondering why some code (quite probably elsewhere on > the page) is not working. Then you'd look in the Error Console where it would tell you that function Hoks does not exist and at which line the error occurred. Even if you don't get the line number a simple global search of your source will give it to you. -- Tim "That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted" -- Bill of Rights 1689
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
An aid for text site developers Dr J R Stockton <reply1227@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-07-05 18:44 +0100
Re: An aid for text site developers "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-06 07:20 +0000
Re: An aid for text site developers Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-06 10:38 -0700
Re: An aid for text site developers Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-07-06 18:44 +0100
Re: An aid for text site developers Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-06 13:26 -0700
Re: An aid for text site developers Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-07-06 22:33 +0100
Re: An aid for text site developers Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-07 21:25 -0700
Re: An aid for text site developers "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2012-07-08 14:43 +1000
Re: An aid for text site developers Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-07-08 20:03 +0200
Re: An aid for text site developers John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-07-09 09:56 +0100
csiph-web