Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #36063
| From | "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Greasemonkey vs the other ones - iframes |
| Date | 2019-02-27 10:39 +0100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <q55ls0$1blk$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <q4r1lv$1gvf$1@gioia.aioe.org> <1htx1nbx4xin1.7q9g7rn7ca18$.dlg@40tude.net> <q51a31$1esd$1@gioia.aioe.org> <q530io$12jr$1@gioia.aioe.org> <f8kp3vdx1qp9$.1r0ztnkhskvn1.dlg@40tude.net> |
JJ, > If the IFRAMEs are static elements Jup, those are the ones I mean. > Because once an element which refer to an external > resource is added into the document, the browser > will immediately put the resource URL into the network > request queue, Not quite true. I can remove image, CSS and script elements just fine (no resource is requested) . Its just those iframes which escape. Or is there some state where "document" != DOM ? Currently I'm assuming that iframes are handled specially, very early on in the populating of the DOM. > and there's no way to undo the queue except from a browser > addon context. RequestPolicy to the rescue! Which is how I noticed those iframes escaped (in a way) scrubbing in the first place. Regards, Rudy Wieser
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Greasemonkey getComputedStyle doesn't doesn't return the expected-and-confirmed value. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-02-21 12:39 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey getComputedStyle doesn't doesn't return the expected-and-confirmed value. "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2019-02-22 00:05 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey getComputedStyle doesn't doesn't return the expected-and-confirmed value. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-02-22 08:59 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey getComputedStyle doesn't doesn't return the expected-and-confirmed value. Flng Fck <nothanks@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-22 09:05 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey getComputedStyle doesn't doesn't return the expected-and-confirmed value. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-02-22 10:50 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey getComputedStyle doesn't doesn't return the expected-and-confirmed value. Joao Rodrigues <jr.c.l.js@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 21:51 -0300
Re: Greasemonkey getComputedStyle doesn't doesn't return the expected-and-confirmed value. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-02-22 09:29 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey getComputedStyle doesn't doesn't return the expected-and-confirmed value. JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2019-02-22 18:49 +0700
Re: Greasemonkey getComputedStyle doesn't doesn't return the expected-and-confirmed value. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-02-22 13:51 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey getComputedStyle doesn't doesn't return the expected-and-confirmed value. Update. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-02-22 14:34 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey getComputedStyle doesn't doesn't return the expected-and-confirmed value.Solved. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-02-22 15:12 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey getComputedStyle doesn't doesn't return the expected-and-confirmed value. JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2019-02-23 10:18 +0700
Re: Greasemonkey getComputedStyle doesn't doesn't return the expected-and-confirmed value. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-02-23 09:53 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey getComputedStyle doesn't doesn't return the expected-and-confirmed value. JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2019-02-23 18:14 +0700
Re: Greasemonkey getComputedStyle doesn't doesn't return the expected-and-confirmed value. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-02-25 18:53 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey vs the other ones - iframes "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-02-26 10:23 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey vs the other ones - iframes "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2019-02-26 11:27 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey vs the other ones - iframes "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-02-26 12:54 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey vs the other ones - iframes "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2019-02-26 19:26 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey vs the other ones - iframes "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-02-27 10:45 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey vs the other ones - iframes "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2019-02-27 12:09 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey vs the other ones - iframes "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-02-27 12:34 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey vs the other ones - iframes "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2019-02-28 11:07 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey vs the other ones - iframes "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-02-28 12:46 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey vs the other ones - iframes "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2019-02-28 22:41 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey vs the other ones - iframes "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-01 09:59 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey vs the other ones - iframes "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2019-03-01 10:55 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey vs the other ones - iframes "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-01 11:40 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey vs the other ones - iframes "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2019-03-01 16:08 +0100
Re: Greasemonkey vs the other ones - iframes JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2019-02-27 00:12 +0700
Re: Greasemonkey vs the other ones - iframes "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-02-27 10:39 +0100
csiph-web